Adaptive-Psychological Learning Framework: Redefining Human Nature and Methodology in the Digital Era
https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.4967
Keywords:
Adaptive Learning, Digital Humanism, Educational Psychology, Human Nature, Learning MethodologyAbstract
The growing digitalization of education has accelerated the mechanization of learning, frequently marginalizing the psychological dimensions of human nature. Prevailing methodologies prioritize narrow cognitive outcomes while neglecting autonomy, affective engagement, and the social essence of learners, resulting in diminished meaning and learner well-being. This study critically analyzes the philosophical and practical implications of human nature—as conceptualized in behaviorism, cognitivism, and humanistic psychology—for the transformation of learning methodologies in contemporary educational contexts. A qualitative library research design was employed, drawing on systematic searches of Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Content analysis and thematic synthesis were applied to 28 peer-reviewed sources published between 2000 and 2023, with theoretical triangulation used to ensure rigor. Three complementary psychological pillars were identified: behaviorism’s contribution to structured feedback, cognitivism’s emphasis on scaffolded mental construction, and humanism’s prioritization of autonomy and self-actualization. Synthesis of these pillars yields an Adaptive-Psychological Methodology (APM) framework. Additionally, the concept of Digital Humanism is proposed, repositioning technology as an amplifier of human agency rather than a substitute for it. Student psychological well-being is argued to constitute a primary indicator of educational success, superseding exclusive reliance on cognitive achievement metrics. Meaningful educational transformation requires a paradigm shift from mechanistic, teacher-centered instruction toward human-centered, facilitative methodologies grounded in psychological science. The three-stage Reorientation–Reconstruction–Resonance (3R) strategic framework is offered as a practical guide for educators, curriculum designers, and policymakers.
References
Babayeva, F. (2025). Humanization of education as a priority of the contemporary pedagogical process. Вісник післядипломної освіти: збірник наукових праць. Серія «Педагогічні науки». ОНОВЛЕНО, 33(62), 12-27. https://ojs.uem.edu.ua/index.php/vpop/article/view/843
Battaglio, R. P., Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2022). Self-determination theory goes public: experimental evidence on the causal relationship between psychological needs and job satisfaction. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1411-1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900351
Biesta, G. (2015). Freeing teaching from learning: Opening up existential possibilities in educational relationships. Studies in philosophy and education, 34(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z
Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. (2023). The AI revolution in education: will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01185. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185
Colelli, J. (2025). From pure experience to cognitive models: constitutive explanations and modalization in phenomenological cognitivism: Jacopo Colelli. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10095-2
Dadandı, İ., & Yazıcı, H. (2024). Cognitive ability or motivation, or both: An integrative path analysis of the interplay between two key factors in academic achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 2342-2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4027
Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887361
Díaz de la Cruz, C., Fernández Fernández, J. L., & Villegas-Galaviz, C. (2025). Model of ethical analysis of digital technologies: towards true digital humanism. AI & SOCIETY, 40(7), 5743-5754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02330-w
Elkins, D. N. (2022). Common factors: What are they and what do they mean for humanistic psychology?. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819858533
Garnham, A. (2019). Cognitivism. The Routledge companion to philosophy of psychology (pp. 99-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244629-7
George-Reyes, C. E., Rumbaut-Rangel, D., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Oliva-Córdova, L. M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Instrumental Adoption to Human-Centered Pedagogical Ecologies. Information, 17(6), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17060616
Henry, C. D. (2017). Humanistic psychology and introductory textbooks: A 21st-century reassessment. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(3), 281. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000056
Iman, M., Arabnia, H. R., & Rasheed, K. (2023). A review of deep transfer learning and recent advancements. Technologies, 11(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020040
Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, skinner, and operant conditioning: Considerations for sport coaching practice. Strategies, 35(3), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2025). Agile-blended learning: an innovative technology-mediated approach to distance education. SN Computer Science, 6(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03646-y
Marginson, S. (2018). Global cooperation and national competition in the world-class university sector. In World-class universities (pp. 13-53). Brill. https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/39594#page=29
Mar’ah, G. H., & Ar-Romli, N. P. (2025). Human psychological phenomena in science and islam: An islamic education values perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v4i4.480
Mruk, C. J., & Skelly, T. (2017). Is self-esteem absolute, relative, or functional? Implications for cross-cultural and humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(4), 313. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000075
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational technology research and development, 71(1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
Peters, M. A. (2020). Posthumanism, platform ontologies and the ‘wounds of modern subjectivity’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(6), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1608690
Ramsey, E., Antoniou, G., Peroni, M., Muckridge, B., Ghattas, R., Fazio, P., ... & Wolf, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A case study of faculty teaching methodologies at a private university. International Journal of Academic Studies in Science and Education, 3(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.55549/ijasse.43
Riva, G. (2025). The Architecture of Cognitive Amplification: Enhanced Cognitive Scaffolding as a Resolution to the Comfort-Growth Paradox in Human-AI Cognitive Integration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19483. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.19483
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation science, 7(2), 97. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mot0000194
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630
Seligman, M. E. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual review of clinical psychology, 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
Selwyn, N. (2024). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
Singer, E. (2022). Piaget and Vygotsky: Powerful inspirators for today’s students in early education and developmental psychology. Piaget and Vygotsky in XXI century: Discourse in early childhood education (pp. 129-143). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05747-2_8
Toktas, E. (2025). Future scenarios of digital humanities and post-humanist education. Journal of Foresight and Health Governance, 2(1), 21-31. https://journalfph.com/index.php/jfph/article/view/3
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational psychology review, 28(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
Wong, P. T. (2017). Meaning-centered approach to research and therapy, second wave positive psychology, and the future of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(3), 207. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000062
Yan, P., Abdulkadir, A., Luley, P. P., Rosenthal, M., Schatte, G. A., Grewe, B. F., & Stadelmann, T. (2024). A comprehensive survey of deep transfer learning for anomaly detection in industrial time series: Methods, applications, and directions. IEEE Access, 12, 3768-3789. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349132
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Najamuddin, Mansur Mansur, Fatmawati Fatmawati, Baso Syafaruddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















