Adaptive-Psychological Learning Framework: Redefining Human Nature and Methodology in the Digital Era

Andi Najamuddin 1 Indonesia , Mansur Mansur 1 Indonesia , Fatmawati Fatmawati 1 Indonesia , Baso Syafaruddin 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam As’adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2026-07-06
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026) PAGES 2247-2258
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.4967
Views / Downloads 62 16

The growing digitalization of education has accelerated the mechanization of learning, frequently marginalizing the psychological dimensions of human nature. Prevailing methodologies prioritize narrow cognitive outcomes while neglecting autonomy, affective engagement, and the social essence of learners, resulting in diminished meaning and learner well-being. This study critically analyzes the philosophical and practical implications of human nature—as conceptualized in behaviorism, cognitivism, and humanistic psychology—for the transformation of learning methodologies in contemporary educational contexts. A qualitative library research design was employed, drawing on systematic searches of Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Content analysis and thematic synthesis were applied to 28 peer-reviewed sources published between 2000 and 2023, with theoretical triangulation used to ensure rigor. Three complementary psychological pillars were identified: behaviorism’s contribution to structured feedback, cognitivism’s emphasis on scaffolded mental construction, and humanism’s prioritization of autonomy and self-actualization. Synthesis of these pillars yields an Adaptive-Psychological Methodology (APM) framework. Additionally, the concept of Digital Humanism is proposed, repositioning technology as an amplifier of human agency rather than a substitute for it. Student psychological well-being is argued to constitute a primary indicator of educational success, superseding exclusive reliance on cognitive achievement metrics. Meaningful educational transformation requires a paradigm shift from mechanistic, teacher-centered instruction toward human-centered, facilitative methodologies grounded in psychological science. The three-stage Reorientation–Reconstruction–Resonance (3R) strategic framework is offered as a practical guide for educators, curriculum designers, and policymakers.

Najamuddin, A., Mansur, M., Fatmawati, F., & Syafaruddin, B. (2026). Adaptive-Psychological Learning Framework: Redefining Human Nature and Methodology in the Digital Era . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(4), 2247–2258. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.4967
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Babayeva, F. (2025). Humanization of education as a priority of the contemporary pedagogical process. Вісник післядипломної освіти: збірник наукових праць. Серія «Педагогічні науки». ОНОВЛЕНО, 33(62), 12-27. https://ojs.uem.edu.ua/index.php/vpop/article/view/843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58442/3041-1831-2025-33(62)-12-27
  2. Battaglio, R. P., Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2022). Self-determination theory goes public: experimental evidence on the causal relationship between psychological needs and job satisfaction. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1411-1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900351
  3. Biesta, G. (2015). Freeing teaching from learning: Opening up existential possibilities in educational relationships. Studies in philosophy and education, 34(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9454-z
  4. Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
  5. Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. (2023). The AI revolution in education: will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01185. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185
  6. Colelli, J. (2025). From pure experience to cognitive models: constitutive explanations and modalization in phenomenological cognitivism: Jacopo Colelli. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10095-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10095-2
  7. Dadandı, İ., & Yazıcı, H. (2024). Cognitive ability or motivation, or both: An integrative path analysis of the interplay between two key factors in academic achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 2342-2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4027
  8. Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887361
  9. Díaz de la Cruz, C., Fernández Fernández, J. L., & Villegas-Galaviz, C. (2025). Model of ethical analysis of digital technologies: towards true digital humanism. AI & SOCIETY, 40(7), 5743-5754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02330-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02330-w
  10. Elkins, D. N. (2022). Common factors: What are they and what do they mean for humanistic psychology?. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819858533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819858533
  11. Garnham, A. (2019). Cognitivism. The Routledge companion to philosophy of psychology (pp. 99-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244629-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244629-7
  12. George-Reyes, C. E., Rumbaut-Rangel, D., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Oliva-Córdova, L. M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Instrumental Adoption to Human-Centered Pedagogical Ecologies. Information, 17(6), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17060616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info17060616
  13. Henry, C. D. (2017). Humanistic psychology and introductory textbooks: A 21st-century reassessment. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(3), 281. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000056
  14. Iman, M., Arabnia, H. R., & Rasheed, K. (2023). A review of deep transfer learning and recent advancements. Technologies, 11(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020040
  15. Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, skinner, and operant conditioning: Considerations for sport coaching practice. Strategies, 35(3), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776
  16. Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2025). Agile-blended learning: an innovative technology-mediated approach to distance education. SN Computer Science, 6(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03646-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03646-y
  17. Marginson, S. (2018). Global cooperation and national competition in the world-class university sector. In World-class universities (pp. 13-53). Brill. https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/39594#page=29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004389632_002
  18. Mar’ah, G. H., & Ar-Romli, N. P. (2025). Human psychological phenomena in science and islam: An islamic education values perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v4i4.480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v4i4.480
  19. Mruk, C. J., & Skelly, T. (2017). Is self-esteem absolute, relative, or functional? Implications for cross-cultural and humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(4), 313. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000075
  20. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational technology research and development, 71(1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
  21. Peters, M. A. (2020). Posthumanism, platform ontologies and the ‘wounds of modern subjectivity’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(6), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1608690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1608690
  22. Ramsey, E., Antoniou, G., Peroni, M., Muckridge, B., Ghattas, R., Fazio, P., ... & Wolf, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A case study of faculty teaching methodologies at a private university. International Journal of Academic Studies in Science and Education, 3(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.55549/ijasse.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55549/ijasse.43
  23. Riva, G. (2025). The Architecture of Cognitive Amplification: Enhanced Cognitive Scaffolding as a Resolution to the Comfort-Growth Paradox in Human-AI Cognitive Integration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19483. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.19483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4wcdb_v1
  24. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation science, 7(2), 97. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mot0000194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
  25. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630
  26. Seligman, M. E. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual review of clinical psychology, 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
  27. Selwyn, N. (2024). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
  28. Singer, E. (2022). Piaget and Vygotsky: Powerful inspirators for today’s students in early education and developmental psychology. Piaget and Vygotsky in XXI century: Discourse in early childhood education (pp. 129-143). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05747-2_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05747-2_8
  29. Toktas, E. (2025). Future scenarios of digital humanities and post-humanist education. Journal of Foresight and Health Governance, 2(1), 21-31. https://journalfph.com/index.php/jfph/article/view/3
  30. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational psychology review, 28(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
  31. Wong, P. T. (2017). Meaning-centered approach to research and therapy, second wave positive psychology, and the future of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(3), 207. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/hum0000062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000062
  32. Yan, P., Abdulkadir, A., Luley, P. P., Rosenthal, M., Schatte, G. A., Grewe, B. F., & Stadelmann, T. (2024). A comprehensive survey of deep transfer learning for anomaly detection in industrial time series: Methods, applications, and directions. IEEE Access, 12, 3768-3789. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349132

Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Najamuddin, Mansur Mansur, Fatmawati Fatmawati, Baso Syafaruddin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Adaptive Learning Digital Humanism Educational Psychology Human Nature Learning Methodology