Analysis of Students’ Readiness to Prepare Research Reports in Research Methodology Courses
https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4599
Keywords:
Student Readiness, Research Reports , Research Methodology , Higher EducationAbstract
Students’ ability to prepare research reports is an important academic competence that must be developed as part of scientific literacy in higher education. A research report not only serves as the final product of learning in a research methodology course, but also reflects students’ readiness to understand research concepts, apply methodological procedures, and communicate research findings in a systematic and academically acceptable manner. In practice, students’ readiness to prepare research reports varies, even after they have completed a Research Methodology course. This study aimed to describe students’ readiness to prepare research reports in a Research Methodology course in terms of five aspects: methodological understanding, technical writing skills, academic readiness, psychological readiness, and learning support. This study employed a descriptive quantitative design involving 35 fifth-semester students in the Mathematics Education program. Data were collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 21 items, distributed online via Google Forms. Data were analyzed descriptively by calculating mean scores and categorizing students’ readiness levels. The results showed that, overall, students’ readiness was at a moderate level across all measured aspects. Learning support obtained the highest mean score, whereas technical skills for preparing research reports received the lowest. These findings indicate that strong learning support is not yet fully matched by students’ internal readiness. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening Research Methodology instruction by placing greater emphasis on research report writing practice, staged exercises, and continuous feedback.
Downloads
References
Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000018908.36113.a5
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 159–172. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-022-00130-z
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
Nugroho, dkk. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jepang dalam Pembelajaran BIPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18(2), 193–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v18i2.15508
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
Street, B. (2010). Academic literacies approaches to genre? Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 10(2), 347–361. https://www.ucs.br/ucs/tplSiget/extensao/agenda/eventos/vsiget/portugues/anais/textos_autor/arquivos/academic_literacies_approaches_to_genre.pdf
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Rahma, dkk (2025). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Metodologi Penelitian Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Mahasiswa, 7(3), 30–43. https://ejurnal.provisi.ac.id/index.php/jurnalmahasiswa/article/download/1275/887/4323
Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research–teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2016.1224674
Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (2016). Writing as a learning activity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12110
Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006
Tutpai dan Unja (2022). Hambatan Dalam Penyusunan Proposal Penelitian Oleh Mahasiswa Keperawatan Stikes Suaka Insan Banjarmasin. Jurnal Keperawatan Suaka Insan (JKSI), 7(1), 18–23. https://repository.stikessuakainsan.ac.id/176/1/document-3.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Netti Kariani Mendrofa, Ratna Natalia Mendrofa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@gmail.com, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com

Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License








.png)