Problem Solving and Cooperative Learning Model of the Jigsaw Type: IPAS Learning Outcomes in Elementary School

Supiarti Supiarti 1 Indonesia , Nurhayati Selvi 1 Indonesia , Syarifah Nur Fajrin 1 Indonesia
1 Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Islam Makassar
Link Copied!
Published 2025-12-27
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) PAGES 665-680
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4407
Views / Downloads 162 145

The low learning outcomes of Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) in elementary schools are the main challenge in this study. This study aims to test and compare the effectiveness of the problem-solving learning model and the jigsaw cooperative learning model in improving the learning outcomes of fourth-grade students in Elementary School Inpres Tello Baru 1I in the 2025/2026 academic year. The research method used is a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design (Non-Equivalent Control Group Design) involving 54 students. Data was collected through observation sheets of teacher and student activities and learning outcome tests. The findings indicated that both models significantly improved the quality of teacher instruction and active student participation. Teachers achieved a score of 93.33% in the problem-solving model and a perfect score of 100% in the jigsaw model at the fourth meeting. Student activity also increased drastically, reaching 92.30% in the problem-solving model and 100% in the jigsaw model. Statistically, there is a significant difference in learning outcomes between the experimental and control classes, where the average posttest score of the experimental class (83.93) is much higher than the control class (73.08). The t-test produces a calculated t value (3.004) > t table (2.006), which proves that the use of the problem-solving and jigsaw models has a greater positive impact than the conventional method. This study recommends both models as innovative strategies to address the low learning outcomes of IPAS in elementary schools.

Supiarti, S., Selvi, N., & Fajrin, S. N. (2025). Problem Solving and Cooperative Learning Model of the Jigsaw Type: IPAS Learning Outcomes in Elementary School. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(1), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4407
More Citation Formats
Download Citation
  1. Agustina, L., & Efendi, R. (2025). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Berbantuan Digital Mind Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam IPAS: Studi Kasus di Kelas V SD Negeri 004 Tambusai Utara. Journal of Education Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i4.2844
  2. Ariswari, N., Zulysa, D., & Dhori, M. (2024). Contextual and project-based learning in IPAS instruction within the Merdeka Curriculum: A case study at MI Al-Azhar Muara Pinang. HEUTAGOGIA: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.14421/hjie.2025.51-03
  3. Asyifa, T. N., Haliza, N., Ferdiyansyah, A., & Asniwati, A. (2025). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Dalam Pembelajaran IPAS di Kelas V SDN Sungai Miai 1. Journal of Teaching and Elementary Education, 1(1), 7-12.
  4. Damopolii, I., Nunaki, J. H., & Supriyadi, G. (2018). Effect of problem solving learning model on students achievement. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v2i1.12558
  5. Hasbi, M., Sarda, M., & Syafaruddin, B. (2025). Technology and Islamic Perspective: A Study of Ethnomathematics. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(3), 1154-1167. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v5i3.3933
  6. Hayati, E. M., Purwanto, A., & Hidayat, D. R. (2023). Analysis of the cooperative learning effectiveness on students’ critical thinking skills in science learning for primary students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 1145-1153. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.994
  7. Jeppu, A. K., Kumar, K. A., & Sethi, A. (2023). ‘We work together as a group’: implications of jigsaw cooperative learning. BMC medical education, 23(1), 734. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04734-y
  8. Komariah, M., As’ary, M. Y., Hanum, C. B., & Maftuh, B. (2023). IPAS Implementation in Elementary Schools: How Teachers Build Student Understanding. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(3), 1399-1412.
  9. Michel, N., Cater III, J. J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human resource development quarterly, 20(4), 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20025
  10. Munawaroh, M., Ratnawati, E., Ningsih, T. Z., & Nuryana, N. (2022). Enhancing students' communication skills in social studies learning through cooperative learning. Ta'dib, 25(1), 71-82.
  11. Nalls, A. J., & Wickerd, G. (2023). The jigsaw method: reviving a powerful positive intervention. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 39(3), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2022.2124570
  12. Patiño, A., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Buenestado-Fernández, M. (2023). Active learning and education 4.0 for complex thinking training: analysis of two case studies in open education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00229-x
  13. Putri, P. N., Rachmadiarti, F., Purnomo, T., & Satriawan, M. (2025). Measuring Scientific Literacy of Students’ Through Environmental Issues Based on PISA 2025 Science Framework. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 44-53. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/10413
  14. Quintero-Angel, M., Duque-Nivia, A. A., & Molina-Gómez, C. A. (2024). A teaching strategy based on active learning which promotes strong sustainability that empowers students to have a different type of relationship with the environment. Environmental Education Research, 30(4), 560-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2211757
  15. Rahmatiani, L., Darmawan, C., & Komalasari, K. (2024). 21st Century Competencies (4C) on Improving Students' Social Skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 7(2), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v7i2.84876
  16. Ramadhani, S. (2023). Implementation Curriculum Merdeka Belajar Learn Science And Social (Ipas) Learning In Elementary School: Perpective Teacher. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(001). https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i001.5488
  17. Ratno, S., Amelia, F. R., Putri, A. S., Fakhrany, I., Lumbantobing, D. W. J., Siregar, H., ... & Salsabila, S. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Berbagai Macam Model-Model Pembelajaran Kreatif Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipas Di Yayasan Tarbiyah Islamiyah Al-Musthofawiyah. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 6356-6362. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/1647
  18. Riyadi, R., Syarifah, T. J., & Nikmaturrohmah, P. (2021). Profile of students’ problem-solving skills viewed from Polya's four-steps approach and elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1625-1638. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1625
  19. Sapri, H. A. (2023). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Based on Polya Problem Solving Steps. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(2), 01-10. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i2.755
  20. Sholikah, L., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Analysis of science literacy ability of junior high school students based on Programme for International Student Assessement (PISA). INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i1.2922
  21. Simanjuntak, R. C., Panjaitan, M. B., & Simarmata, R. K. (2025). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPAS Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 091477 Dolok Marlawan. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(4), 9559-9570. http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/21123
  22. Singer, E. (2022). Piaget and Vygotsky: Powerful inspirators for today’s students in early education and developmental psychology. In Piaget and Vygotsky in XXI century: Discourse in early childhood education (pp. 129-143). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05747-2_8
  23. Soedimardjono, F. P., & Pratiwi, P. (2021). Cooperative Learning Model with Jigsaw Type Improves Students’ Sciences Process Skills and Learning Outcomes. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.25203
  24. Stanczak, A., Darnon, C., Robert, A., Demolliens, M., Sanrey, C., Bressoux, P., ... & Butera, F. (2022). Do jigsaw classrooms improve learning outcomes? Five experiments and an internal meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1461. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000730
  25. Suendarti, M., & Virgana, V. (2022). Elevating Natural Science Learning Achievement: Cooperative Learning and Learning Interest. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(1), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.20419
  26. Sulfemi, W. B., & Kamalia, Y. (2020). Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model Using Audiovisual Media To Improve Learning Outcomes. JPsd (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar), 6(1), 30-42. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jpsd/article/view/4919
  27. Surul, R., & Septiliana, L. (2023). Analysis of the implementation of ipas (natural and social sciences) learning in the merdeka curriculum. Educatio: Journal of Education, 8(2), 320-328.
  28. Terentev, E., Shcheglova, I., Federiakin, D., Koreshnikova, Y., & Costley, J. (2024). Active versus Passive Teaching: Students’ Perceptions and Thinking Skills. Вопросы образования, (3 (1)), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-16364
  29. Ting, F. S., Shroff, R. H., Lam, W. H., Garcia, R. C., Chan, C. L., Tsang, W. K., & Ezeamuzie, N. O. (2023). A Meta-analysis of Studies on the Effects of Active Learning on Asian Students' Performance in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(3), 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00661-6
  30. Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., ... & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
  31. Tsaniyyati, L., & Andriani, A. E. (2024). Development of Mobile Learning based on Problem Solving to Improve IPAS Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 7086-7094. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7757
  32. Usman, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Utaya, S., & Kuswandi, D. (2022). The Influence of JIGSAW Learning Model and Discovery Learning on Learning Discipline and Learning Outcomes. Pegem Journal of Education and instruction, 12(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.17
  33. Willett, L. R. (2017). Comparing active and passive learning: what does the evidence really say?. Academic Medicine, 92(5), 573. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001637
  34. Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments (pp. 35-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3

Copyright (c) 2025 Supiarti Supiarti, Nurhayati Selvi, Syarifah Nur Fajrin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Cooperative Jigsaw Elementary School IPAS Learning Outcomes Learning Model Problem Solving