Padlet-Based Predict Observe Explain (POE) Learning Model: Learning Outcomes of PAI and Character Education

1 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Link Copied!

This research is motivated by low student learning outcomes in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) and Character Building at Middle School 7 Krui, particularly in higher-order thinking skills (C5 and C6). This issue stems from monotonous teaching methods, varied student comprehension levels, limited media, and low motivation. This study aims to determine the effect of the Padlet-based Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) learning model on student learning outcomes. Using a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental, post-test only control group design, the sample comprised two classes: an experimental class taught via the Padlet-based POE model and a control class taught conventionally. Data were collected using validated and reliable multiple-choice tests, then analyzed using normality, homogeneity, t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed a significant difference in learning outcomes between the two groups, with a t-test significance value of 0.030 and a Mann-Whitney test value of 0.040 (p < 0.05). This indicates that the Padlet-based POE model effectively improves learning outcomes, especially in critical and analytical thinking. This success is driven by the POE syntax—prediction, observation, and explanation—integrated with interactive digital media, which enhances student activity, motivation, and comprehension. In conclusion, the Padlet-based POE learning model has a positive and significant influence on student learning outcomes. It serves as an innovative and effective alternative learning strategy for Islamic Religious Education and Character Education.

Tomi, R., Baharudin, B., & Saputra, M. I. (2026). Padlet-Based Predict Observe Explain (POE) Learning Model: Learning Outcomes of PAI and Character Education . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(3), 1812–1824. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.4996

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adeulliah, N. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Poe (Predict-Observe-Explain) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Novie. Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 09(5), 2477–5673. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.1990
  2. Al Anshory, M. L. (2020). Problematika Pembelajaran SKI di Madrasah Tsanawiyah YAPI Pakem. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, 16(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.20414/jpk.v16i1.2222
  3. Amalia, A., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Siswa Smp Ypwks Cilegon Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pola Bilangan. Wahana Didaktika : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 18(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v18i3.4370
  4. Amelia, N. C., Zulhelmi, Z., Syaflita, D., & Siswanti, Y. (2021). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran POE Berbantuan Game Edukasi Berbasis Aplikasi Educandy di SMPN 25 Pekanbaru. Diffraction, 3(2), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v3i2.4145
  5. Anggraini, Y. M., Wahyuni, E. A., Sidik, R. F., Rakhmawan, A., & Hadi, W. P. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Poe Berpendekatan Steam Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Natural Science Education Research, 6(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v6i1.16620
  6. Astrini, D. W., Khotimah, K., & Cholifah, P. S. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 1(8), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065v1i82021p665-675
  7. Budi, B., Novanto, Y. S., & Anitra, R. (2021). Respon Siswa Terhadap Model Pembelajaran Poe Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sd. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Fisika, 7(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i2.5508
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Eagleton, S. (2017). Designing blended learning interventions for the 21st century student. Advances in physiology education, 41(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00149.2016
  10. Fauhah, H., & Rosy, B. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Make A Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p321-334
  11. Fidya, I., Romdanih, & Oktaviana, E. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPS Melalui Media Game Interaktif Wordwall. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara III SEMNARA, 219–227. https://www.jurnal.stkipkusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/semnara2020/article/view/1301
  12. Fitrianingsih, E., Mulyani, H., & Lepiyanto, A. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Poe (Predict-Observe-Explain) Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Di Sman Rawajitu Selatan. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 12(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v12i2.4440
  13. Gebresilase, B. M., Zhao, W., Taddese, E. T., Elka, Z. Z., & Feng, Y. (2025). The mediating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between student teacher interaction and students’ university academic achievement. Cogent Psychology, 12(1), 2500181. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2500181
  14. Indrawan, G. B., Sari, G. A. G. M., Putri, K. U. D., Handayani Putri, D. P., & Dewi, L. J. E. (2022). Pelatihan Dasar Penggunaan Aplikasi Microsoft Office Dan Paint Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Umeanyar. Jurnal Widya Laksana, 11(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.23887/jwl.v11i1.34066
  15. Jasper-Abowei, F. E., & Victor-Ishikaku, E. C. (2023). Contextual learning approach: A tool for enhancing critical thinking skills amongst learners’. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(5), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GB2SR
  16. Juniwati, D. S. (2020). Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Dicovery Dan Model Pembelajaran POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) Pada Materi Perpajakan Di Kelas XI. Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE), 1(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v1i1.47
  17. Khalifatussadiah, S. P. S. S. A. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Make a Match Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sd. EJoES (Educational Journal of Elementary School), 1(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.30596/ejoes.v1i1.4554
  18. Lestari, F. D., Ibrahim, M., Ghufron, S., & Mariati, P. (2021). Pengaruh budaya literasi terhadap hasil belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5087-5099. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1436
  19. Lima, V. V. (2017). Constructivist spiral: an active learning methodology. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 21, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622016.0316
  20. Lusiana, L., Suhartati, S., & Zubaidah, T. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa melalui strategi pembelajaran prediction-bbservation-explanation (POE) di kelas VIII SMPN 18 banda aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 25-32.
  21. Mallombasi, S. F., & Sayidiman, S. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Predict , Observe , Explain ( POE ) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Kelas IV SD Negeri No . 18 Maero Kecamatan Bontoramba Kabupaten Jeneponto. Pinisi Journal of Education, 18, 1–14. https://eprints.unm.ac.id/33494/
  22. Marantika, J. E. R. (2021). Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.17392
  23. Mardicko, A. (2022). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 54.
  24. Marhento, G. (2020). Model Pembelajaran POE ( Predict Observe Explain ) Solusi Alternatif Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains, 1(1), 267–272. https://proceeding.unindra.ac.id/index.php/sinasis/article/view/3969
  25. Masithoh, A. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw Menggunakan Media Flipbook Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Kelas V SD. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran Dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 4(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v4i1.80
  26. Montgomery, D. C., & Silvestrini, R. T. (2018). Design of experiments: A key to successful innovation. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 12 (pp. 279-291). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75295-2_15
  27. Murtihapsari, M., Parafia, A., & Pare Rombe, Y. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain (Poe) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Dasar Siswa. Jurnal Zarah, 10(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v10i1.4253
  28. Nahdotun Nisa, D., & Lisnawati, S. (2021). Pengaruh Metode Somatic Auditory Visual Intelectually (SAVI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar SKI. GEPCOMM Diagnostic Essay, 11(1), 73–82. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadzkiyyah/article/view/6014
  29. Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Ahdhianto, E., Samsudin, A., & Isnantyo, F. D. (2021). A Review of Gamification Impact on Student Behavioral and Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(21), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i21.24381
  30. Noor, S. (2020). Penggunaan Quizizz dalam penilaian pembelajaran pada materi ruang lingkup Biologi untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas X.6 SMA 7 Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Hayati, 6(1), 1–7.
  31. Noor, A. F., Yunus, R., Suyidno, S., & Fahmi, F. (2023). Development of Predict-Observe-Explain (Poe) Based Authentic Problems’ Instructional Package To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 14(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.53932
  32. Paoliana, N., Taufik, M., & Rokhmat, J. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran poe (predict-observe-explain) terhadap hasil belajar dan kreativitas fisika peserta didik. GeoScienceEdu, 1(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i1.38
  33. Prasetiyaningsih, A., & Jember, S. N. 3. (2020). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Analitik Dan Aktivitas Siswa Smp Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Poe (Prediction, Observation, Explanation). Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 26–34.
  34. Qiptiyyah, M. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Pkn Materi Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Pancasila Melalui Metode Jigsaw Kelas Viii F Mts Negeri 5 Demak. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.31316/g.couns.v5i1.1187
  35. Rahmawati, I., Setiani, A., & Lukman, H. S. (2022). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran POE dengan Pendekatan Metaphorical Thinking terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. Prisma, 11(2), 320. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i2.2342
  36. Raslan, G. (2024). The impact of the zone of proximal development concept (scaffolding) on the students problem solving skills and learning outcomes. BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2023: Multidisciplinary Studies (pp. 59-66). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56121-4_6
  37. Rubin, M., & Donkin, C. (2024). Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests. Philosophical Psychology, 37(8), 2019-2047. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771
  38. Schmidt, F. L. (2015). History and development of the Schmidt–Hunter meta‐analysis methods. Research synthesis methods, 6(3), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1134
  39. Setianingsih, D. A., Handoyo, E., Wardani, S., Subali, B., & Widiarti, N. (2025). The effect of using pjbl-based interactive e-modules on improving learning outcomes. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(2), 1179-1198. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v6i2.1240
  40. Signoret, J. P., & Leroy, A. (2021). Monte Carlo Simulation. In Reliability Assessment of Safety and Production Systems: Analysis, Modelling, Calculations and Case Studies (pp. 547-586). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64708-7_32
  41. Suprihatin, S., & Manik, Y. M. (2020). Guru Menginovasi Bahan Ajar Sebagai Langkah Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. PROMOSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi), 8(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.24127/pro.v8i1.2868
  42. Tiruneh, D. T., Gu, X., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2018). Systematic design of domain-specific instruction on near and far transfer of critical thinking skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.005
  43. Yandi, A., Nathania Kani Putri, A., & Syaza Kani Putri, Y. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengarui Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik (Literature Review). Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara (JPSN), 1(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.38035/jpsn.v1i1.14
  44. Widiana, I. W., Triyono, S., Sudirtha, I. G., Adijaya, M. A., & Wulandari, I. G. A. A. M. (2023). Bloom’s revised taxonomy-oriented learning activity to improve reading interest and creative thinking skills. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2221482. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2221482
  45. Wulandari, Y., Mutmainnah, P. A., & Agustina, S. (2022). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran (Poe) Untuk Menganalisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Materi Asam Basa Kelas Xi Di Sman 1 Kilo. Jurnal Redoks : Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.33627/re.v5i2.894
  46. Zajda, J. (2025). Using social constructivism to improve students’ engagement and motivation. In Globalisation, performance culture and students’ motivation (pp. 83-100). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91155-2_5
  47. Zega, A. (2024). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Poe Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Abadi. Bina Darma, 17(2), 106–120. https://journal.binadarma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalbinaedukasi/article/view/3405/1444

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles