Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Writing Skills Learning: A Systematic Review

Wiwiek Zulfiani Rahman 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam As’adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2026-02-20
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026) PAGES 981-994
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4727
Views / Downloads 1112 1345

AI has rapidly changed English Language Teaching (ELT), notably writing skills. AI has enormous potential, but educators and academics still struggle with its ethical use, over-reliance, and integration into an organized curriculum. This project will thoroughly review AI integration in English writing skills learning. It examines the most used AI technologies, their efficacy in improving writing, and their pedagogical implications. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Data were synthesized from peer-reviewed articles published between 2023 and 2026 across major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A total of [35] pertinent studies were chosen according to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings indicate that AI tools, including Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, and intelligent grammar checkers (e.g., Grammarly), significantly enhance writing accuracy, coherence, and student motivation by delivering prompt, individualized feedback. However, the review also identifies critical issues, including concerns over academic integrity, potential algorithmic bias, and a "dependency trap" where students may prioritize AI output over the development of their voice. This paper presents a complete framework for educators and policymakers to responsibly integrate AI into writing teaching. The area benefits from perceiving AI as a "collaborative partner" in the writing process rather than a "correction tool" and recognizing the importance of digital literacy and ethical principles in modern English classrooms.

Rahman, W. Z. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Writing Skills Learning: A Systematic Review. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(2), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4727
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adhikari, B., Das, P., & Chakraborty, B. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Different Generative AI Models For Scholarly Articles. International Conference on Data Management, Analytics & Innovation (pp. 1-18). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6534-1_1
  2. Cai, L., Msafiri, M. M., & Kangwa, D. (2025). Exploring the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 7191-7264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0
  3. Chelghoum, H., & Chelghoum, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical concerns. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society (JSLCS), 8(1), 1-14. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/266929
  4. Colby, R. S. (2025). Playing the digital dialectic game: Writing pedagogy with generative AI. Computers and Composition, 75, 102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102915
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  6. Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
  7. Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: What is it and where is it taking us?. ESP Today-Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 10(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.1
  8. Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N. G., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2577-2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x
  9. Jamshaid, S. (2025). AI Writing Tools (eg, ChatGPT/Grammarly) in Higher Education: A Catalyst for Learning or a Threat to Integrity?. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(4), 419-428. https://rjsaonline.com/journals/index.php/rjsa/article/view/488
  10. Kuddus, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: Practices and prospects. Advanced analytics and deep learning models, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792437.ch1
  11. Laari, S., Lorentz, H., Jonsson, P., & Lindau, R. (2023). Procurement's role in resolving demand–supply imbalances: an information processing theory perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(13), 68-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2022-0382
  12. Li, J., & Li, M. (2022). Assessing L2 writing in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100913
  13. Ma, H., Ismail, L., & Han, W. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence in language teaching and learning (1990–2023): evolution, trends and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 25211-25235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12848-z
  14. Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2025). Every advantage has its disadvantage: Side effects of teacher feedback in L2 writing. RELC Journal, 00336882251376701. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251376701
  15. Meniado, J. C. (2023). Digital language teaching 5.0: Technologies, trends and competencies. Relc Journal, 54(2), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231160610
  16. Murphy, S., & O'Neill, P. (2022). Assessing writing to support learning: Turning accountability inside out. Routledge.
  17. Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599-622. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v1i10.366
  18. Raihan, N., Siddiq, M. L., Santos, J. C., & Zampieri, M. (2025). Large language models in computer science education: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 56th ACM technical symposium on computer science education V. 1 (pp. 938-944). https://doi.org/10.1145/3641554.3701863
  19. Saeli, H., & Cheng, A. (2019). Effects of L1 writing experiences on L2 writing perceptions: Evidence from an English as a foreign language context. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(6), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1579129
  20. Saputra, I., Kurniawan, A., Yanita, M., Putri, E. Y., & Mahniza, M. (2024). The evolution of educational assessment: How artificial intelligence is shaping the trends and future of learning evaluation. The indonesian journal of computer science, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i6.4465
  21. Selwyn, N. (2024). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
  22. Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2025102700000291759377835
  23. Vasylyshyna, N., Skyrda, T., Lazorenko, N., & Kravets, I. (2024). Legal perspective on Artificial Intelligence andacademic integrity within university educationprocess participants research activity: Newpossibilities along with new limitations. Scientific Journals of the International Academy of Applied Sciences in Lomza, 96(4), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.58246/xr3thd36
  24. Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380
  25. Yadav, D. S. (2024). Navigating the landscape of AI integration in education: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations for harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for teaching and learning. BSSS Journal of Computer, 15(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.51767/jc1503
  26. Yan, C., He, C., & Sheng, H. (2026). ‘Grades alone are insufficient!’Chinese EFL student teachers’ perspectives on teacher written feedback on course essays. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 63(1), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2437116
  27. Zadenoori, M. A., Dąbrowski, J., Alhoshan, W., Zhao, L., & Ferrari, A. (2025). Large language models (llms) for requirements engineering (re): A systematic literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11446. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.11446
  28. Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of teacher, peer, and automated writing evaluation feedback on developing deep writing skills: a comparative study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09469-x

Copyright (c) 2026 Wiwiek Zulfiani Rahman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence Educational Technology ELT English Writing Skills Systematic Literature Review