Analysis of Elementary School Students' Creative Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Level of Mathematical Understanding
https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i3.5863
Keywords:
Creative Thinking, Data Handling , Elementary School Students, Mathematical Problem Solving, Mathematical UnderstandingAbstract
Creative thinking is an essential mathematics competency, supporting idea generation, strategy selection, and non-routine problem solving. At the elementary level, it must be developed systematically so students move beyond routine procedures toward flexible, logical, reflective thinking. This study describes sixth-grade students' creative thinking in solving data-handling problems by level of mathematical understanding. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, three sixth-grade students at UPT SD Negeri 099 Masamba were purposively selected for high, moderate, and low understanding levels. Data were collected through a creative-thinking test and semi-structured interviews, analyzed using fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration indicators. Credibility was strengthened through triangulation of written responses and interviews; data were processed through reduction, display, verification, and conclusion drawing. The high-ability student displayed all four indicators strongly and consistently, proposing alternative strategies, adjusting solution steps, developing logical plans, and re-checking solutions. The moderate-ability student showed all indicators but was inconsistent in exploring ideas, developing solutions, and evaluating answers. The low-ability student showed limitations in independently generating strategies, developing solutions, and explaining reasoning in detail. These findings show that understanding level relates to differences in students' creative-thinking characteristics in problem solving. Instruction should therefore give students room to explore strategies, explain reasoning, and reflect on solutions.
Downloads
References
Abdussalam, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Makassar: Syakir Media.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Arifin, M., Suyitno, H., & Dewi, N. R. (2020). Mathematics creative thinking skills in problem-based learning model reviewed from learners’ curiosity and gender. Journal of Primary Education, 9(5), 511–517.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225(2), 82–90.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. (2019). The modified math anxiety scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 862.
Cowan, N. (2020). Working memory capacity and its role in cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 214–220.
Cresswell, C., & Speelman, C. P. (2020). Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236153.
Firmansyah, M. A., & Syarifah, L. L. S. (2023). Mathematical problem solving ability in view of learning styles. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 58–66.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Hadiwijaya, A. S. (2023). Sintesa teori konstruksi sosial realitas dan konstruksi sosial media massa. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(1), 75–89.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2020). Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2020). Scaffolding and creativity in digital learning environments. Computers & Education, 148, 103798.
Ilyas, M. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan matematika. Bandung: Pustaka Ramadhan.
Journal of Mathematics Education. (2023). Characteristics of students’ mathematical problem solving abilities in solving open-ended-based virtual reality games. DOAJ.
Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Creative behavior as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 713–744.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Keputusan Kepala BSKAP Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Komarudin, K., Rinaldi, A., Yulina, R., Suherman, S., & Puspita, L. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa di Indonesia: Analisis jalur. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 67–76.
Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The effects of problem posing learning model on students’ learning achievement and motivation (arXiv:2002.04447). arXiv.
Kurniani, K. H., Dwijanto, D., & Dwidayati, N. K. (2020). Mathematics creative thinking skill reviewed by students’ metacognitions on creative problem-solving learning model implementation. Journal of Primary Education, 9(3), 286–294.
Kusumaningtyas, A., & Murti, R. C. (2025). Creative thinking profiles of elementary students in solving mathematical story problems: A descriptive study. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(1), 463–474.
Lai, E. R. (2020). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson Research Report.
Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Metacognition and creativity in mathematics problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100805.
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In Problem solving in mathematics education (pp. 1–39). Springer.
Masfingatin, T., Murtafiah, W., & Maharani, S. (2020). Exploration of creative mathematical reasoning in solving geometric problems. Mathematics Education Journal, 14(2), 155–168.
Miller, L., Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2021). Assessing creativity in education: Digital and project-based approaches. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 1321–1337.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mufliva, R., Turmudi, T., Herman, H., Iriawan, S. B., & Fitriani, A. D. (2024). Problem-solving skills and productive struggle of students in solving mathematical problems in elementary school. Southeast Asia Mathematics Education Journal, 14(1), 69–82.
Mutijah, M. (2018). Kolaborasi pendekatan pembelajaran matematika problem solving, realistik, dan open-ended. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 16(2), 187–204.
Ng, Y. X., & Toh, T. L. (2023). A framework for designing problem solving task for secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 8(2).
Ng, Y. X., & Toh, T. L. (2024). On some guiding principles of enacting mathematical problem solving for classroom instruction. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 16(1).
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pambudi, D. S., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2020). The role of mathematical connections in mathematical problem solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 129–144.
Patel, R. (2021). Adaptive thinking in education: The new frontier. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 20(2), 101–115.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Putra, Y. Y., Sutrisno, J., & Rahmadi, I. F. (2024). Level of creative thinking ability of students in solving numeracy problems. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 9(2).
Rahayuningsih, S., Ikram, M., & Indrawati, N. (2023). Learning to promote students’ mathematical curiosity and creativity. Uniciencia, 37(1), 1–13.
Rahayuningsih, S., Nurhusain, M., & Indrawati, N. (2022). Mathematical creative thinking ability and self-efficacy: A mixed-methods study involving Indonesian students. Uniciencia, 36(1), 1–14.
Rahayuningsih, S., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2023). Creative thinking skills in mathematics learning. Journal on Mathematics Education.
Ritter, S. M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PLOS ONE, 15(3), e0229773.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Mathematical Problem Solving: Foundations, Processes, and Research. Springer.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: Tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 211–222.
Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2021). Metacognition and academic performance: Current trends. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1–24.
Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2021). Metacognition and creative problem solving: Recent developments. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 431–456.
Shaw, S. T., Luna, M. L., Rodriguez, B., Yeh, J., Villalta, N., & Ramirez, G. (2022). Mathematical creativity in elementary school children: General patterns and effects of an incubation break. Frontiers in Education, 7, 835911.
Silfiana, I. S. A., & Purwanti, K. Y. (2021). The creative thinking ability in elementary school mathematics problem solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 45–55.
Siregar, A., et al. (2024). Student difficulties in solving open-ended model mathematics problems. INOMATIKA.
Skurnik, A., Ackerman, R., & Kenett, Y. N. (2025). Semantic memory and creative evaluation. BMC Psychology, 13, 824.
Song, Y., Kim, J., Xing, W., Liu, Z., Li, C., & Oh, H. (2024). Elementary school students’ and teachers’ perceptions towards creative mathematical writing with generative AI. arXiv.
Students’ mathematical creative thinking skills in solving PISA problems. (n.d.). DOAJ.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmaangara, B., & Madawistama, S. T. (2021). Divergent thinking and convergent thinking in the mathematical creative thinking process in terms of student brain dominance. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 11(1), 53–66.
Swanson, H. L., & Alloway, T. (2022). Working memory and academic learning: Current insights. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(1), 18–29.
UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining our futures together: Education for sustainable development.
Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0204847.
Yuliyanto, A., Turmudi, T., Syaodih, E., Dharmawan, A., Pertiwi, C. K., Muqodas, I., & Saputra, D. R. (2021). Mathematics creative thinking skills instrument to solve cube and rectangular prism volume problems for elementary school students. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 59–84.
Yuliyanto, E., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
Zepeda, C. D., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2023). Assessing metacognitive regulation during problem solving: A comparison of three measures. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 16.
Zhan, X., Li, X., & Huang, S. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and tolerance for ambiguity in fostering creative problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100815.
Zhang, Y., & Dai, Q. (2022). Academic self-efficacy and strategy use in mathematics learning. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 500–518.
Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Effects of open-ended problem solving on students' creative thinking: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 This is an open-access under the CC-BY-SA license
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@gmail.com, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com
Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
