Navigating Reading Challenges: Phenomenological Study of Teachers Supporting Struggling Readers in Philippine Context

Joselito C. Gutierrez 1 Philippines , Dawn Lois D. Songyoen 2 Philippines , Naomi Joy S. Raguindin 2 Philippines , Khate Ashleey B. Respicio 2 Philippines , Axcel Rey Sampaga 2 Indonesia , Brian Dave A. Sibucao 2 Philippines , Cyril M. Simpliciano 2 Philippines , Marc Russel M. Simpliciano 2 Philippines , Hogan C. Tan 2 Philippines , Anthony L. Tique 2 Philippines , Ralph Henry B. Villacarlos 2 Philippines
1 Education Department, Saint Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines
2 Secondary Education major in English, Saint Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines
Link Copied!
Published 2026-11-01
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026) PAGES 472-485
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.5549
Views / Downloads 0 0

Struggling readers are a persistent concern in Philippine elementary education, yet research has largely examined student reading outcomes rather than the professional, emotional, and instructional experiences of the teachers who support these learners in resource-constrained, multilingual classrooms. This study investigated the lived experiences of elementary English teachers in identifying and supporting struggling readers, and how they adapt their pedagogy and negotiate contextual barriers. Transcendental phenomenological design was employed. Fifteen proficient public elementary English teachers in Baguio City, Philippines, were selected through criterion purposive sampling and interviewed using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis, and trustworthiness was supported through member checking. Four themes emerged: (a) diagnostic triage through standardized literacy assessments, (b) pedagogical flexibility and differentiated scaffolded instruction, (c) ecosystemic collaboration via remedial and peer networks, and (d) socio-contextual barriers, including parental illiteracy and resource constraints. The findings suggest that Vygotskian scaffolding must be extended to account for ecological and linguistic barriers in post-colonial multilingual classrooms, because its effectiveness is bounded by the educational and socioeconomic capital of the home. Implications for teacher professional development, curriculum localization, language-in-education policy, and parental partnership are discussed.

Gutierrez, J. C., Songyoen, D. L. D., Raguindin, N. J. S., Respicio, K. A. B., Sampaga, A. R., Sibucao, B. D. A., … Villacarlos, R. H. B. (2026). Navigating Reading Challenges: Phenomenological Study of Teachers Supporting Struggling Readers in Philippine Context . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 6(1), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.5549
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abejuela, H. J. M., Akut, K. B., Balane, C. T., & Del Rosario, A. S. C. (2023). Assessment of the Reading Curriculum in Basic Education in the Philippines Context. International Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.23641
  2. Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
  3. Assiri, A. I., & Siddiqui, A. (2020). Interpretive Reading as a Strategy to Construct Meaning in EFL Reading Comprehension: A Case Study at King Khalid University. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 411-419. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.28
  4. Bernardo, A. B., Cordel, M. O., Lucas, R. I. G., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2021). Using machine learning approaches to explore non-cognitive variables influencing reading proficiency in English among Filipino learners. Education Sciences, 11(10), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100628
  5. Ehri, L. C. (2022). What teachers need to know and do to teach letter–sounds, phonemic awareness, word reading, and phonics. The Reading Teacher, 76(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2095
  6. Fabillaran, K. (2024). Reading profile assessment: The interplay of fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension among junior high school learners. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4806052
  7. Gu, P. Y. (2021, March). An argument-based framework for validating formative assessment in the classroom. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 605999). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.605999
  8. Guo, Z., Chen, C., & Guo, R. (2025). The impact of parental involvement, social support, and peer relationships on L2 learning motivation: A mixed-methods study of Chinese university EFL students. Acta psychologica, 254, 104804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104804
  9. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. School leadership & management, 39(2), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964
  10. Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: On the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3
  11. Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change: G. Jenkins. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
  12. Juhkam, M., Jõgi, A. L., Soodla, P., & Aro, M. (2023). Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1191103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103
  13. Karageorgos, P., Wallot, S., Müller, B., Schindler, J., & Richter, T. (2023). Distinguishing between struggling and skilled readers based on their prosodic speech patterns in oral reading: An exploratory study in grades 2 and 4. Acta psychologica, 235, 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103892
  14. Kavani, R., & Amjadiparvar, A. (2018). The effect of strategy-based instruction on motivation, self-regulated learning, and reading comprehension ability of Iranian EFL learning. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1556196. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1556196
  15. Kim, Y. S. G., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2020). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low-and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Child development, 91(2), 638-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13204
  16. Køster, A., & Fernandez, A. V. (2023). Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research: A. Køster, AV Fernandez. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09723-w
  17. Lampi, J. P., Armstrong, S. L., Talwar, A., & Magliano, J. P. (2025). Reading matters in supporting students: The role of complex literacy tasks in academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 27(3), 880-901. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251231214557
  18. Lee, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2024). Cross-linguistic relations of morphological awareness between Korean and English to language and reading skills for Korean adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 249, 106118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106118
  19. Li, J., & Gu, P. Y. (2026). Teacher continuing professional development in formative assessment: A pathway to enhanced student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 174, 105426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105426
  20. Motshusi, M. C., Ngobeni, E. T., & Sepeng, P. (2024). Lack of parental involvement in the education of their children in the foundation phase: Case of selected schools in the Thabazimbi Circuit. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 6(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2024.20
  21. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 45–59.
  22. Penderi, E., Karousou, A., & Papanastasatou, I. (2023). A multidimensional–multilevel approach to literacy-related parental involvement and its effects on preschool children’s literacy competences: A sociopedagogical perspective. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121192
  23. Pocaan, J. M., Bailon, L. L., & Pocaan, J. P. T. (2022). Strategic reading intervention for left-behind learners in the Philippines. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.5087
  24. Sangers, N. L., van der Sande, L., Welie, C., Dobber, M., & van Steensel, R. (2025). Learning a language through reading: A meta-analysis of studies on the effects of extensive reading on second and foreign language learning. Educational Psychology Review, 37(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10068-6
  25. Satriani, S., Hasbi, M., Razaq, Y., Muzkiyah, N., & Fahira, A. (2022). Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Reading Comprehension: A Review for Prospective Teachers. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(2), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.339
  26. Serry, T., Snow, P., Hammond, L., McLean, E., & McCormack, J. (2022). Educators’ perspectives about teaching and supporting students with learning difficulties in reading. Australian Journal of Education, 66(3), 292-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221130551
  27. Shin, H. G., & Kim, D. (2025). Effects of the English language intervention as a foreign language for struggling elementary readers in South Korea: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 26, 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09999-6
  28. Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, culture and social interaction, 16, 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009
  29. Sutherland, J., Westbrook, J., Oakhill, J., & Sullivan, S. (2024). An immersive, “Faster Read”: A pilot, mixed-method study developing whole-text reading comprehension and engagement with adolescent struggling readers. Research Papers in Education, 39(6), 774–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2023.2238285
  30. Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6-7), 573-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225
  31. Trezek, B. J., & Zepp, L. (2025). Special educators’ knowledge of foundational reading skills: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 48(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064241298245
  32. Tribujeña, H. D., Enoy, J. S., & Elumba, D. (2025). Exploring the impact of Project WORDS on the affect, behavior, and cognition of 7th-grade struggling readers in English. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5161519
  33. White, P., & Vibulphol, J. (2020). How tiered English instruction affects reading comprehension of Thai students in mixed-ability EFL classrooms. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(2), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i2.18036
  34. Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
  35. Yapao-Alcantara, J., & Ducot, L. (2025). Collaborative strategies of teachers and parents and their impact on learners’ reading levels. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 42(8), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.420805
  36. Yu, J., & Liu, X. (2022). Text first or picture first? Evaluating two modes of multimodal input for EFL vocabulary meaning acquisition. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221119469. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119469
  37. Zhu, S., Zhu, X., Yao, Y., & Cheong, C. M. (2025). Profiling the differences in strategy use in online multimodal reading: Associations with self-efficacy and reading task performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87, 101507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101507
  38. Zou, D., & Teng, M. F. (2023). Effects of tasks and multimedia annotations on vocabulary learning. System, 115, 103050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103050

Copyright (c) 2026 Joselito C. Gutierrez, Dawn Lois D. Songyoen, Naomi Joy S. Raguindin, Khate Ashleey B. Respicio, Axcel Rey Sampaga, Brian Dave A. Sibucao, Cyril M. Simpliciano, Marc Russel M. Simpliciano, Hogan C. Tan, Anthony L. Tique, Ralph Henry B. Villacarlos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Elementary Education English Language Teaching Multilingual Context Reading Difficulties Teacher Experiences
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC