Analysis of Students University Understanding of Juvenile Criminal Decisions from the Perspective of Legal Education

Siswanto Siswanto 1 Indonesia , Samsuddin Samsuddin 2 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam As'adiyah Sengkang
2 Universitas Islam As’adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2025-12-25
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) PAGES 525-536
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4158
Views / Downloads 242 109

This study examines As'adiyah Sengkang Islamic University (UNISAD) students' understanding of juvenile criminal decisions in legal education. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (UU SPPA No. 11 of 2012) requires child protection principles like diversion and restorative justice, but students at the Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Law (FSHI) UNISAD may not understand them when analyzing court decisions. This study examines how students internalize the child protection paradigm and how the Islamic legal education curriculum shapes their views on juvenile criminalization. The method is empirical legal study utilizing quantitative and qualitative methods. Primary data was collected from FSHI students who took juvenile criminal law courses using standardized questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Patterns and comprehension were found using descriptive data analysis. The results indicate that kids comprehend diversion theoretically. When presented with real-life decision cases, their understanding tends to revert to a retributive approach (conventional punishment), indicating that campus legal education has not fully transformed their thinking paradigm to a comprehensive child protection perspective. This project provides data-driven feedback for the FSHI UNISAD to improve juvenile criminal justice teaching techniques and curriculum. To make legal education more relevant, graduates should know sharia theory and positive law and be sensitive and competent to monitor restorative justice methods in juvenile criminal justice.

Siswanto, S., & Samsuddin, S. (2025). Analysis of Students University Understanding of Juvenile Criminal Decisions from the Perspective of Legal Education. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(1), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4158
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adha, A. Z., & Shahriza, N. (2025). Rekonstruksi Pendidikan Hukum Indonesia: Etika, Profesionalisme, dan Integritas di Era Transformasi Digital. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Budaya, 1(01), 01-07. http://jurnal.mifandimandiri.com/index.php/husobud/article/view/645
  2. Albaba, M. F., & Yahya, F. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perundungan Menurut UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak Dan Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus di Polresta Banda Aceh). Jarima: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(1), 79-97. https://jim.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/JIMHPI/article/view/747
  3. April, K., Schrader, S. W., Walker, T. E., Francis, R. M., Glynn, H., & Gordon, D. M. (2023). Conceptualizing juvenile justice reform: Integrating the public health, social ecological, and restorative justice models. Children and Youth Services Review, 148, 106887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106887
  4. Bachmid, A. A. (2025). Perlindungan anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak: Kebijakan dan pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(1), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i1.838
  5. Balan, A. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Law Students as Agents of Public Legal Education and Community Empowerment. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 32(2), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v32i2.1692
  6. Busriani, H. (2024). Penerapan Pendekatan Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Kebijakan Diversi Dan Peran Masyarakat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU SPPA), Serta Tantangan Implementasinya. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU, 1(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.257
  7. Dali, M. W., Gino, K. K., Sana'u, A. A., Paputungan, A. C. P., Rahman, K. P., Husain, M. R. F., ... & Saerang, N. C. (2025). Analisis Kejelasan Bahasa Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim di Pengadilan Negeri Gorontalo. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2(12), 2045-2052. https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i12.2002
  8. Firmansyah, A., Setiawan, D., Pratama, F., Marwan, T., Almanda, A., Oktarianda, S., ... & Juna, A. M. (2024). Putusan Pengadilan Sebagai Sumber Hukum Yurispudensi. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i2.79
  9. Habernal, I., Faber, D., Recchia, N., Bretthauer, S., Gurevych, I., Spiecker genannt Döhmann, I., & Burchard, C. (2024). Mining legal arguments in court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09361-y
  10. Hews, R., Beligatamulla, G., & McNamara, J. (2023). Creative confidence and thinking skills for lawyers: Making sense of design thinking pedagogy in legal education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101352
  11. Khairunnisa, P., & Rasji, R. (2024). Menilik Penjatuhan Sanksi Kumulatif Terhadap Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(4), 990-1001. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i4.935
  12. Kurniyawan, H., & Moeslim, A. H. A. (2024). Pendidikan Hukum Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v9i2.31722
  13. Lubis, Y. A., Cahyaningrum, R., Sari, S. A., & Safitri, K. N. (2025). Revitalising the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Comparative Study with International Law and Evaluation of Practice. Ius Comparatum: Journal of Law Studies, 1(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.35586/jicls.v1i1.10829
  14. Mears, D. P., Kuch, J. J., Lindsey, A. M., Siennick, S. E., Pesta, G. B., Greenwald, M. A., & Blomberg, T. G. (2016). Juvenile court and contemporary diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both?. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 953-981. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12223
  15. Miller, V., Fernandez, F., & Hutchens, N. H. (2023). The race to ban race: Legal and critical arguments against state legislation to ban critical race theory in higher education. Mo. L. Rev., 88, 61.
  16. Muchtar, S., Irwansyah, I., Yunus, A., Arifin, A. P., & Faried, M. (2024). Juvenile Criminal Responsibility in Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations in Indonesia and Australia. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.387
  17. Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its originis and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
  18. Nievelstein, F., Van Gog, T., Boshuizen, H. P., & Prins, F. J. (2010). Effects of conceptual knowledge and availability of information sources on law students’ legal reasoning. Instructional Science, 38(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9076-3
  19. Nur, F. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Penanganan Perkara Anak. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.7752
  20. Setyowati, D. (2020). Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan. Pandecta research law journal, 15(1), 121-141.
  21. Singh, V., & Yadav, R. K. (2025). Transforming legal education: The role of clinical legal education in bridging theory and practice. Available at SSRN 5244915. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5244915
  22. Sliva, S., Shaw, M., & Han, T. M. (2020). Policy to practice: an implementation case study in restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(4), 527-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1700371
  23. Sugiarto, A. (2025). Tinjauan kritis terhadap implementasi diversi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(6), 1864-1870. https://doi.org/10.59141/cerdika.v5i6.2647
  24. Supianto. (2025). Bridging justice expectations in child protection: media influence and societal bias. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2025.2474446
  25. Suvall, C. (2009). Restorative justice in schools: Learning from Jena high school. Harv. CR-CLL Rev., 44, 547.
  26. Ulu-Aslan, E., & Baş, B. (2023). Popular culture texts in education: The effect of tales transformed into children's media on critical thinking and media literacy skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101202
  27. Wilsa, W. (2025). The implementation strategy of juvenile criminal law and its impact on juvenile recidivism prevention programs. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 13(2), 484-493. https://www.jurnal.konselingindonesia.com/index.php/jkp/article/view/1632
  28. Yusuf, M., Putra, D. A., Putri, R. S., Saputra, M. B., & Syafiqi, D. K. (2025). Legal harmonization of child protection in human trafficking: A comparative study of Indonesian positive law and Islamic law. Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society, 1(2), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.64929/ilsiis.v1i2.14

Copyright (c) 2025 Siswanto Siswanto, Samsuddin Samsuddin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Court Decisions Juvenile Crime Legal Education Restorative Justice Student Understanding