Using Padlet to Improve Students' Personal Letter-Writing Skills

Nur Ferawati 1 Indonesia , Sultan Baa 2 Indonesia , Nurul Asma 3 Indonesia
1 SMK Ma'arif NU Doro Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
2 Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
3 SMP Negeri 36 Makassar, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2022-09-27
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022) PAGES 489-498
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.353
Views / Downloads 919 687

At the SMK level, mastery of English content involves four language skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Students frequently struggle with the four language skills mentioned above when learning English. Up to 75% of students at SMK Maarif NU Doro Vocational School continue to perform below KKM. The author decided to explain the subject of the analysis of the student's abilities to produce personal letter texts since it really caught his or her attention. The goal to be achieved in this research is to improve students' ability to compose a personal letter text. The technique used in this research is to make observations and test student performance in the form of an online written test. The student scores from the evaluation of the written test in the first cycle were 15 students (62.5%) who had reached the KKM. In the assessment of product results in the form of writing a personal letter and then sending it via a Padlet, 23 students (95.8%) met the KKM. At the end of the cycle, on the summative test, as many as 20 (80.2%) students passed the summative test without doing any remedial. As suggested, the implementation of online learning activities using the Padlet link to improve students' ability to write texts in the form of personal letters.

Ferawati, N., Baa, S., & Asma, N. (2022). Using Padlet to Improve Students’ Personal Letter-Writing Skills. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.353
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
  2. Altrichter, H. (2020). The concept of quality in action research: Giving practitioners a voice in educational research. In Qualitative voices in educational research (pp. 40-55). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003008064-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008064-5
  3. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
  4. Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
  5. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  6. Erbil, D. G. (2020). A review of flipped classroom and cooperative learning method within the context of Vygotsky theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157
  7. Huang, H. M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British journal of educational technology, 33(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00236
  8. Husband, G. (2020). Ethical data collection and recognizing the impact of semi-structured interviews on research respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206
  9. Jong, B., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Using Padlet as a Technological Tool for Assessment of Students' Writing Skills in Online Classroom Settings. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 411-423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.411.423
  10. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2019). Critical participatory action research. In Action learning and action research: Genres and approaches. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-537-520191016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-537-520191016
  11. Khasinah, S. (2013). Classroom action research. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v4i1.159
  12. Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. Sage.
  13. Lestari, S. (2017). Implementing padlet application to improve writing ability in English writing skill for non English department students. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 7(1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/let.v7i1.1640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v7i1.1509
  14. Maliki, B. I., Kusuma, J. W., Mulyadi, M., Meilisa, R., & Hamidah, H. (2021). Distance Learning In An Educational Perspective In Indonesia During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(3), 606-614. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1142
  15. McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2018). Evolution of the Action Research Planners: Towards Critical Participatory Action Research. In Education in an Era of Schooling (pp. 61-78). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2053-8_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2053-8_5
  16. Meesuk, P., Sramoon, B., & Wongrugsa, A. (2020). Classroom action research-based instruction: The sustainable teacher professional development strategy. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 98-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0008
  17. Mertler, C. A. (2009). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Sage.
  18. Mettetal, G. (2002). The what, why and how of classroom action research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6-13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1589
  19. Michel, N., Cater III, J. J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human resource development quarterly, 20(4), 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20025
  20. Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
  21. Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
  22. Norton, L. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870433
  23. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital science and education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  24. Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10(3), 610-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103044
  25. Rakhmanina, L., Martina, F., Halolo, F. B., Syafryadin, S., & Noermanzah, N. (2020). Students’ perception on online English learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 3(2), 428-439. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v3i2.1150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v3i2.1150
  26. Sari, F. M. (2020). Exploring English learners’ engagement and their roles in the online language course. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 349-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.446
  27. Subakthiasih, P., & Putri, I. G. A. V. W. (2020). An analysis of students’ motivation in studying English during COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(1), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i1.1728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i1.1728
  28. Taufikurohman, I. S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using Padlet in teaching writing descriptive text. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 71-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2190
  29. Wichadee, S., & Pattanapichet, F. (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an English language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 77-92. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/955431
  30. Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Writing Personal Letter Padlet