Cooperative Learning on The Academic Achievement of Middle-School Students Based on Learning Style

Kurniati Arifin 1 Indonesia
1 Postgraduate, Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Link Copied!
Published 2022-03-27
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) PAGES 112-121
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.175
Views / Downloads 1078 1085

The goals of this study are to (1) see if students who are taught using the Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning model learn mathematics better than students who are taught using the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) model, and (2) see if the results of learning mathematics with visual learning styles are better than those with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. As a result, this sort of study is an experiment. The experimental class I was class VIII students from Public Junior High School 1 North Sinjai. The findings revealed that: (1) students who were taught using the TAI type had better mathematics learning outcomes than students who were taught using the STAD type; (2) the inferential analysis revealed that it was not true that students with visual learning styles had better mathematics learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.

Arifin, K. (2022). Cooperative Learning on The Academic Achievement of Middle-School Students Based on Learning Style. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.175
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Agbo, F. J., & Oyelere, S. S. (2019). Smart mobile learning environment for programming education in Nigeria: adaptivity and context-aware features. In Intelligent Computing-Proceedings of the Computing Conference (pp. 1061-1077). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22868-2_71
  2. Amin, M. (2016). Pengaruh Mind Map dan Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v1i1.893
  3. Ardayeni, E., Yuhana, Y., & Hendrayana, A. (2019). Analisis germane cognitive load siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar matematis pada pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 5(01), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i01.12727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i01.12727
  4. Azis, Y. M., & Leatemia, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of e-Learning, Learning Styles, Prior Knowledge, and Internet Self Efficacy in Business Mathematics Courses. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(2), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v12i2.31022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v12i2.31022
  5. Bajaj, R., & Sharma, V. (2018). Smart Education with artificial intelligence-based determination of learning styles. Procedia computer science, 132, 834-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095
  6. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33235/jarna.22.2.27-30
  7. Cahyaningsih, U. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (team assisted individualization) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran matematika. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 4(1), 266427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v4i1.707
  8. De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 20(4), 631-642. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
  9. DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2002). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan.(terjemahan Alwiyah Abdurrahman). Bandung: Kaifa (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1992. New York: Dell Publishing).
  10. Dimyati, M. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  11. Gaol, R. L., & Sitepu, A. (2020). The Influence of Used Good-Based Learning Media on the Value of Chracter Education and Student's Motivation to Study. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(4), 1696-1703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i4.1299
  12. Farozin, M., Kurniawan, L., & Irani, L. C. (2020). The role of guidance and counseling in character education. In 2nd International Seminar on Guidance and Counseling 2019 (ISGC 2019) (pp. 112-116). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200814.025
  13. Haryono, A., & Tanujaya, B. (2018). Profil kemampuan penalaran induktif matematika mahasiswa pendidikan matematika unipa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Journal of Honai Math, 1(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v1i2.1049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v1i2.1049
  14. Hassan, M. A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., & Shoaib, M. (2021). Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745
  15. Junaedi, I. (2019). Proses Pembelajaran Yang Efektif. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 3(2), 19-25.
  16. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011). E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & education, 56(3), 885-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001Get DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001
  17. Labib, A. E., Canós, J. H., & Penadés, M. C. (2017). On the way to learning style models integration: a Learner's Characteristics Ontology. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 433-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.054
  18. Lane, S., Hoang, J. G., Leighton, J. P., & Rissanen, A. (2021). Engagement and Satisfaction: mixed-method analysis of blended learning in the sciences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 100-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00139-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00139-5
  19. Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.020
  20. Maba, W. (2017). Teacher's Perception on the Implementation of the Assessment Process in 2013 Curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(2), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26
  21. Martono, M. (2019). Improving students character using fairy tales. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 180-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v4i1.993
  22. Maulida, Y., & Ahmad, R. (2021). THE CONCEPT OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CHARGE CHANGE, MODERNIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Literasi Nusantara, 2(1), 121-128.
  23. Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational research methods, 11(2), 364-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059
  24. Nahar, N. I. (2016). Penerapan teori belajar behavioristik dalam proses pembelajaran. NUSANTARA: jurnal ilmu pengetahuan sosial, 1(1).
  25. Nurmala, W., Tiro, M. A., & Sanusi, W. (2021). The Effect of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Cooperative Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. In International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM 2021) (pp. 57-61). Atlantis Press.
  26. Nurzakiaty, I. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Dalam Pembelajaran Integral Di Kelas XII IPA-2 SMA Negeri 8 Banda Aceh. Jurnal peluang, 3(2).
  27. Ozerem, A., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Learning environments designed according to learning styles and its effects on mathematics achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (61). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/30026/324167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.4
  28. Pardede, K., Ahmad, M., & Harahap, M. S. (2021). ANALISIS GAYA BELAJAR SERTA PENGARUH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SELAMA PANDEMI COVID-19. JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 4(2), 243-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37081/mathedu.v4i2.2526
  29. Rahman, A., Ahmar, A., & Rusli, R. (2016). The influence of cooperative learning models on learning outcomes based on students’ learning styles. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/wtetev14i3y2016p6425430
  30. Sa'adiah, H., Syaiful, S., Hariyadi, B., & Yudistira, P. (2021). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) and jigsaw learning in terms of numerical abilities: The effect on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 4(3), 247-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v4i3.9746
  31. Salido, A., & Dasari, D. (2019). Students’ errors in solving probability problems viewed by learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1211, No. 1, p. 012067). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012067
  32. Schulze, S., & Bosman, A. (2018). Learning style preferences and Mathematics achievement of secondary school learners. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-8. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-d34ed5baa DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1440
  33. Setiawan, A. S., & Alimah, S. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran visual auditory kinesthetic (VAK) terhadap keaktifan siswa. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v6i1.7284
  34. Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x
  35. Silitonga, L. M., & Wu, T. T. (2019). Increasing students’ interest and learning achievement using cooperative learning (Students Team Achievement Division) through Edmodo. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 3-13). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_1
  36. Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
  37. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik, Terj. Nurulita, Bandung: Nusa Media.
  38. Simbolon, N. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat belajar peserta didik. Elementary School Journal Pgsd Fip Unimed, 1(2).
  39. Suarsana, I., Widiasih, N. P. S., & Suparta, I. N. (2018). The Effect of Brain Based Learning on Second Grade Junior Students' Mathematics Conceptual Understanding on Polyhedron. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 145-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5005.145-156
  40. Suprijono, A. (2011). Cooperative Learning; Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. cet. ke-5. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
  41. Syam, A. P., Akib, I., & Syamsuddin, A. (2020). The application of cooperative learning model of team assisted individualization (tai) based manipulative media on topics “shape” of class vi elementary school of tombolok gowa. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 317-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v7i3.11876
  42. Toropova, A., Johansson, S., & Myrberg, E. (2019). The role of teacher characteristics for student achievement in mathematics and student perceptions of instructional quality. Education Inquiry, 10(4), 275-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1591844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1591844
  43. Tristanti, L. B., & Hidayati, W. S. (2020). The Implementation of Cooperative Learning Type Team Assisted Individualisation for Teaching 3D Geometry. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2), 279-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.11139
  44. Wahyuni, Y. (2017). Identifikasi gaya belajar (visual, auditorial, kinestetik) mahasiswa pendidikan matematika universitas bung hatta. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2037
  45. Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Cooperative Learning Academic Achievment TAI STAD Learning Style