Adaptive Curriculum Development Management Framework: A Systematic Literature Review on Student Needs and Teacher Competence

Erni Ekafitria Bahar 1 Indonesia , Syamsiarna Nappu 2 Indonesia , Nursakiah Nursakiah 1 Indonesia , Ikhbariaty Kautsar Qadry 1 Indonesia , Sitti Rahma Tahir 1 Indonesia
1 Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
2 Department of English Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2026-09-02
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026) PAGES 80-93
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.5190
Views / Downloads 192 30

Curriculum quality is central to educational effectiveness, yet research on curriculum management, student needs, teacher competence, and adaptive education has largely developed in isolation. This study systematically examines how curriculum development management grounded in students' learning needs and teachers' professional competencies can be integrated within an adaptive education framework. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. From an initial pool of 847 records, 32 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from major international databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, Wiley, PubMed) and nationally accredited SINTA journals met the inclusion criteria and underwent thematic analysis. Four interrelated themes emerged: (1) student needs analysis as the foundation of curriculum planning; (2) teacher competence as the core driver of adaptive implementation; (3) Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as the primary design framework; and (4) responsive, data-informed evaluation and feedback mechanisms. Synthesizing these dimensions, this study proposes the Integrative Conceptual Framework of Adaptive Curriculum Management (KIMKA). The framework conceptualizes a dynamic, cyclical model that positions students need as a continuous reference point, treats teachers as active co-developers, and frames evaluation as an ongoing reflective practice. The primary novelty lies in this holistic, non-linear conceptualization, offering key theoretical and practical implications for educational leaders, policymakers, and practitioners—particularly in advancing inclusive curriculum reform such as Indonesia's Kurikulum Merdeka.

Bahar, E. E., Nappu, S., Nursakiah, N., Qadry, I. K., & Tahir, S. R. (2026). Adaptive Curriculum Development Management Framework: A Systematic Literature Review on Student Needs and Teacher Competence . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 6(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.5190
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abu-Rasheed, H., Weber, C., & Fathi, M. (2023). Context based learning: a survey of contextual indicators for personalized and adaptive learning recommendations–a pedagogical and technical perspective. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1210968). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1210968
  2. Afriadi, B., & Fitri, F. (2025). Curriculum evaluation model: Paradigm and implications in improving the quality of education. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v16i1.58117
  3. Akala, B. M. M. (2021). Revisiting education reform in Kenya: A case of Competency Based Curriculum (CBC). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100107
  4. AlRawi, J. M., & AlKahtani, M. A. (2022). Universal design for learning for educating students with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. International journal of developmental disabilities, 68(6), 800-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.1900505
  5. Anugrah, D. S., Supriadi, U., & Anwar, S. (2024). Multicultural education: Literature review of multicultural-based teacher education curriculum reform. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 39, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.875
  6. Anwar, C., Munir, M. S., Muharram, M. S., & Rozaq, M. M. N. (2025). Implementasi pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 4(4), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v4i4.3780
  7. Ashari, R., Ishomuddin, I., Tobroni, T., & Khozin, K. (2023). From theory to practice: Ralph W. Tyler's perspective on the curriculum transformation. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v7i2.410
  8. Asuncion, A. C., de Vera Asuncion, A., Macalipis, J. G., Borromeo, C. M. T., Rivera, J. C., & Limon, M. R. (2023). Weaving gaps in garments education technology: Crafting a skill-based E-toolkit based on Taba's curriculum development model. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100656
  9. Beck Wells, M. (2022). Student perspectives on the use of universal design for learning in virtual formats in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00218-6
  10. Belbase, S., Sharma, B., Pant, B. P., Khanal, B., Panthi, R. K., Kasemsukpipat, W., & Al Farra, N. K. (2022). Philosophical foundations for curriculum decision: A reflective analysis. SN Social Sciences, 2(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00344-5
  11. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Waddington, D. I., & Pickup, D. I. (2019). Twenty-first century adaptive teaching and individualized learning operationalized as specific blends of student-centered instructional events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), e1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1017
  12. Christensen, A. A., & Jerrim, J. (2025). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes. A cross-national analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 156, 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104920
  13. Coşkun Yaşar, G., & Aslan, B. (2021). Curriculum theory: A review study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies (IJOCIS), 11(2). http://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2021.012
  14. Dack, H., & Ann Tomlinson, C. (2025). Preparing novice teachers to differentiate instruction: Implications of a longitudinal study. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(1), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241232419
  15. DeLuca, C., & Richardson, M. (2026). Assessment in service of students: celebrating the work of Paul Black. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 33(2), 75-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2026.2673243
  16. El-Astal, M. (2023). What is curriculum? Building a broader understanding of the term. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(6), 188-196.
  17. El Zaatari, W., & Maalouf, I. (2022). How the Bronfenbrenner bio-ecological system theory explains the development of students’ sense of belonging to school?. Sage Open, 12(4), 21582440221134089. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221134089
  18. Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López-Bastías, J. L., & Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal design for learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620
  19. Grossen, M., Zittoun, T., & Baucal, A. (2022). Learning and developing over the life-course: A sociocultural approach. Learning, culture and social interaction, 37, 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100478
  20. Hadisaputra, P., Haryadi, L. F., Zuhri, M., Thohri, M., & Zulkifli, M. (2024). The role of teachers in curriculum management implementation: A narrative literature review on challenges, best practices, and professional development. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(5), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51338
  21. Hallinger, P. (2026). Six pivot points in the evolution of instructional leadership research and practice, 1960–2025. Interchange, 57(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-026-09556-7
  22. Hansen, J. Ø., Jensen, A., & Nguyen, N. (2020). The responsible learning organization: Can Senge (1990) teach organizations how to become responsible innovators?. The learning organization, 27(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2019-0164
  23. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers' work. Journal of professional capital and community, 5(3-4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039
  24. Hidayat, M. T., Suryadi, S., Latifannisa, N., Sari, S. N., & Rino, R. (2025). Evolution of the education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 6(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v6i2.1312
  25. Kelly, O., Buckley, K., Lieberman, L. J., & Arndt, K. (2022). Universal Design for Learning-A framework for inclusion in Outdoor Learning. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 25(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00096-z
  26. Korobkova, O. K., Galchenko, N. A., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Drozdova, E. A., Zakharova, O. V., & Lobuteva, A. V. (2025). A scoping review of contemporary frameworks, challenges, and future directions on educational technology for digital generations. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), ep611. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17517
  27. Leatemia, L. D., Susilo, A. P., Donkers, J., & van Merrienboer, J. J. (2023). Developing student-centred perspectives in PBL: how teacher profiles reveal educational needs for faculty development programmes. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 580. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04538-0
  28. Levey, S. (2023). Universal design for learning. Journal of Education, 203(2), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211031954
  29. Lubis, S. K., & Syawalina, S. (2024). Learning assessment in the merdeka curriculum: diagnostic, formative, and summative. Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan, 10(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v10i2.12599
  30. Manizabayo, P., & Kachchhap, S. L. (2025). Teacher Preparedness, Availability of Teaching Materials, and the Implementation of Competence-based Curriculum. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 33(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.1.09
  31. Maryati, M., Ferianto, F., Suryana, S., Makbul, M., & Munafiah, N. U. (2024). Curriculum Evaluation and Development: A Systematic Approach to Literature Review in Educational Management. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(1), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i1.4947
  32. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2022). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista panamericana de salud publica, 46, e112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
  33. Priyadharsini, V., & Mary, R. S. (2024). Universal design for learning (UDL) in inclusive education: Accelerating learning for all. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(4), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i4.7489
  34. Rusconi, L., & Squillaci, M. (2023). Effects of a universal design for learning (UDL) training course on the development teachers’ competences: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050466
  35. Salmerón Aroca, J. A., Moreno Abellán, P., & Martínez de Miguel López, S. (2022). Teachers’ professional development and intelligent ways of coping with it: A systematic review in elementary and middle school education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010001
  36. Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable development, 33(2), 1921-1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
  37. Sutrisno, S., Badeni, B., & Risdianto, E. (2024). Needs Analysis the Importance of Improving Teacher’s Competence in Facilitating Student-Centered Learning. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(2), 736-749. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.362
  38. Suwarni, S. (2023). Curriculum development management: Challenges and opportunities in the era of global education. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v11i2.11861
  39. Talvio, M., Ferreira, M., & Meda, L. (2024). Innovations in teaching and learning: international approaches in developing teacher education and curriculum for the future. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1403661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403661
  40. Tarmo, A., & Kimaro, A. (2021). The teacher education curriculum and its competency‐based education attributes. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 6(3), e01255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1255
  41. Thaariq, Z. Z. A. (2026). Bridging theory and context: An integrative review for developing an adaptive curriculum framework in Indonesia. Review of Education, 14(2), e70163. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70163
  42. Thoriq, A., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2023). Education for sustainable development (ESD): A systematic literature review on curriculum development strategy design. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(5), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4803
  43. Tran, D., & O’Connor, B. R. (2024). Teacher curriculum competence: How teachers act in curriculum making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2271541
  44. Utami, P. R., Rahmawati, L., & Noktaria, M. (2025). Pengembangan kompetensi dan soft skill dalam implementasi kurikulum merdeka: Tinjauan literatur. MANAJERIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 5(1), 55-65.
  45. Wildan, Kurniawan, R. A., & Fatriani, E. (2026). Curriculum transitions and teacher adaptability: Examining experience, school demographics, and pedagogical challenges in Indonesia. Curriculum Perspectives, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00316-8
  46. Wirtati, I., Nasution, R. H., & Siregar, M. F. Z. (2025). Curriculum management as a foundation for effective schools. EDUTEC: Journal of Education And Technology, 8(2), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v8i3.1101

Copyright (c) 2026 Erni Ekafitria Bahar, Syamsiarna Nappu, Nursakiah Nursakiah, Ikhbariaty Kautsar Qadry, Sitti Rahma Tahir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Adaptive Education Curriculum Management Student Needs Systematic Literature Review Teacher Competency
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC