Effectiveness of E-Learning Media in Asynchronous Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education

Asce Patongloan 1 Indonesia , Ratnawati Prayogi 1 Indonesia , Freddy J. Rumambi 1 Indonesia , Alfred Inkriwang 1 Indonesia
1 Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia (IBM) Asmi, Jakarta
Link Copied!
Published 2025-09-27
Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025) PAGES 1634-1646
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3949
Views / Downloads 643 222

Asynchronous learning is important to worldwide higher education's digital transition. Despite extensive technology usage, issues about asynchronous learning media quality and pedagogy persist. Most studies have used the participants' final exam scores to evaluate the effectiveness of asynchronous learning. Consequently, this study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of e-learning media in facilitating asynchronous learning within the Officer Cadet Advancement Training Program (CATP or PASIS) at the higher education level. The primary focus of the research is to identify the level of participant engagement, their perceptions of the effectiveness of e-learning media, and the challenges faced by both participants and facilitators during the learning process. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data collected through questionnaires administered to 47 respondents at Poltekpel Barombong and qualitative data gathered through in-depth interviews with participants, instructors, and e-learning administrators. The findings indicated that most participants regularly access the platform, complete assignments on time, and feel comfortable with self-directed learning. However, forum participation and learning motivation vary, especially among e-learning novices. While most respondents say e-learning media helps them understand the topic, they still need direct instruction, especially for technical content. Internet instability, lack of two-way communication, and participant digital incompetence are the key issues. Improved material quality, facilitator training, and solid support mechanisms improve e-learning deployment.

Patongloan, A., Prayogi, R., Rumambi, F. J., & Inkriwang, A. (2025). Effectiveness of E-Learning Media in Asynchronous Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 4(4), 1634–1646. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3949
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abid, M., Suhrab, M. I. R., Osnin, N. A., Nik, W. M. N. S. W., & Hammad, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of self-e-learning, classroom teaching, and simulation training on learning of COLREG: a survey-based analysis among maritime students at the Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2398282
  2. Abuhassna, H., & Alnawajha, S. (2023). The transactional distance theory and distance learning contexts: Theory integration, research gaps, and future agenda. Education Sciences, 13(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020112
  3. Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
  4. Alt, D. (2017). Constructivist learning and openness to diversity and challenge in higher education environments. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9223-8
  5. Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149.
  6. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R. E., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in human behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  7. Bixler, A., Eslinger, M., Kleinschmit, A. J., Gaudier-Diaz, M. M., Sankar, U., Marsteller, P., ... & Robertson, S. (2021). Three steps to adapt case studies for synchronous and asynchronous online learning. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 22(1), 10-1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2337
  8. Cahyadi, T., & Mirianto, A. D. (2023). Peran Teknologi Informasi Dalam Keberhasilan Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan di Bidang Pelayaran. Journal of Syntax Literate, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i2.11381
  9. Danaher, M., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). Asynchronous learning. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation (pp. 1-6). Springer, Singapore.
  10. Drumm, S. (2025). Applying individual strategies enhances learning in asynchronous learning paths. Computers and Education Open, 8, 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100257
  11. Du, X., Zhang, M., Shelton, B. E., & Hung, J. L. (2022). Learning anytime, anywhere: a spatio-temporal analysis for online learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1633546
  12. Fadhilah, M., Sutrisna, S., Muslimah, S. N., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). An exploring methods in online learning: Synchronous and asynchronous. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.55
  13. Fructuoso, I. N., Albó, L., & Beardsley, M. (2022). University students’ preference for flexible teaching models that foster constructivist learning practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7968
  14. Ghilay, Y. (2024). Rapid Transition to Online Learning: Faculty Distance Training on LMS, Synchronous/Asynchronous Learning, and Computer-Assisted Assessment. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(6), 10-5539. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n6p61
  15. Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2018). Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning quality in developing countries university settings. International journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183551/
  16. Halim, U., & Hidayat, N. (2025). The Sequential Levels of the Digital Divide in the Educational Domain Among Indonesian University Students. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 10(1), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i1.4427
  17. Hung, C. T., Wu, S. E., Chen, Y. H., Soong, C. Y., Chiang, C. P., & Wang, W. M. (2024). The evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: student experience, learning outcomes, and cognitive load. BMC medical education, 24(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05311-7
  18. Kalamas Hedden, M., Worthy, R., Akins, E., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Paul, R. C. (2017). Teaching Sustainability Using an Active Learning Constructivist Approach: Discipline-Specific Case Studies in Higher Education. Sustainability, 9(8), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081320
  19. Kim, S., & Kim, D. J. (2021). Structural relationship of key factors for student satisfaction and achievement in asynchronous online learning. Sustainability, 13(12), 6734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126734
  20. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
  21. Liu, M., & Yu, D. (2023). Towards intelligent E-learning systems. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 7845-7876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11479-6
  22. Loeng, S. (2018). Various ways of understanding the concept of andragogy. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1496643. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496643
  23. Matsieli, M., & Mutula, S. (2024). COVID-19 and digital transformation in higher education institutions: Towards inclusive and equitable access to quality education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080819
  24. Metz, C. J., & Metz, M. J. (2022). The benefits of incorporating active learning into online, asynchronous coursework in dental physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00110.2021
  25. Mhlanga, D., Denhere, V., & Moloi, T. (2022). COVID-19 and the key digital transformation lessons for higher education institutions in South Africa. Education sciences, 12(7), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070464
  26. Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2022). Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8
  27. Muzaini, M., Rahayuningsih, S., Nasrun, N., & Hasbi, M. (2021). Creativity in synchronous and asynchronous learning during the covid-19 pandemic: a case study. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1722-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897
  28. Neffati, O. S., Setiawan, R., Jayanthi, P., Vanithamani, S., Sharma, D. K., Regin, R., ... & Sengan, S. (2021). An educational tool for enhanced mobile e-Learning for technical higher education using mobile devices for augmented reality. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 83, 104030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104030
  29. Özbey, M., & Kayri, M. (2023). Investigation of factors affecting transactional distance in E-learning environment with artificial neural networks. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4399-4427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11346-4
  30. Perhubungan, K. (2023). Kementerian Perhubungan. Direktorat Jenderal Sipil, 13.
  31. Phanphech, P., Tanitteerapan, T., Mungkung, N., Arunrungrusmi, S., Chunkul, C., Songruk, A., ... & Kinoshita, H. (2022). An analysis of student anxiety affecting on online learning on conceptual applications in Physics: Synchronous vs. asynchronous learning. Education Sciences, 12(4), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040278
  32. Pramesworo, I. S., Sembiring, D., Sarip, M., Lolang, E., & Fathurrochman, I. (2023). Identification of new approaches to information technology-based teaching for successful teaching of millennial generation entering 21st century education. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 350-370. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2722
  33. Ratan, R., Ucha, C., Lei, Y., Lim, C., Triwibowo, W., Yelon, S., ... & Chen, V. H. H. (2022). How do social presence and active learning in synchronous and asynchronous online classes relate to students’ perceived course gains?. Computers & Education, 191, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621
  34. Raviolo, P., Messina, S., Mauro, I., & Rondonotti, M. (2021). E-tutor Profiles in Online Higher Education: Skills and Organizational Models. In International Workshop on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (pp. 187-196). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96060-5_14
  35. Roach, V. A., & Attardi, S. M. (2022). Twelve tips for applying Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance to optimize online teaching. Medical Teacher, 44(8), 859-865.
  36. Rosen, D., & Kelly, A. M. (2023). Mixed methods study of student participation and self-efficacy in remote asynchronous undergraduate physics laboratories: contributors, lurkers, and outsiders. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00428-5
  37. Schreiber, W. B. (2022). Teaching in a pandemic: Adapting preparations for asynchronous remote learning using three evidence-based practices. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(2), 106. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2022-04154-001
  38. Servant-Miklos, V., & Noordegraaf-Eelens, L. (2021). Toward social-transformative education: An ontological critique of self-directed learning. Critical Studies in Education, 62(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1577284
  39. Sharma, A., Bharti, & Pandey, A. (2024). Unleashing the Potential of Technology-Driven Learning Management Systems for Student-Centric Excellence to Empower Higher Education. Engineering Proceedings, 59(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059195
  40. Stecuła, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on dissemination of innovative e-learning tools in higher education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020089
  41. Varkey, T. C., Varkey, J. A., Ding, J. B., Varkey, P. K., Zeitler, C., Nguyen, A. M., ... & Thomas, C. R. (2023). Asynchronous learning: a general review of best practices for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036
  42. Xianxiao, Z. (2024). Simulation research on interactive entertainment e-learning based on visual saliency testing in music multimedia teaching system. Entertainment Computing, 50, 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100676
  43. Xiao, J. (2025). Revisiting the theory of transactional distance: Implications for open, distance, and digital education in the 21st century. American Journal of Distance Education, 39(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2024.2303328
  44. Yaqin, L. N., Prasojo, L. D., Haji-Othman, N. A., Yusof, N., & Habibi, A. (2023). Addressing the digital divide in Indonesian higher education: Insights, implications, and potential solutions. In From digital divide to digital inclusion (pp. 291-307). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7645-4_13
  45. Yildiz Durak, H. (2025). What makes an effective online course experience?: Student perceptions and needs for online course design elements in the context of feedback and collaborative learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 969-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09748-z
  46. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  47. Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2024). Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4297-4313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953
  48. Zheng, Y. (2024). E-learning and speech dynamic recognition based on network transmission in music interactive teaching experience. Entertainment Computing, 50, 100716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100716
  49. Zsifkovits, M., Amplatz, L., Triebner, N., Utz, J., Kornhuber, J., & Spitzer, P. (2025). Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 850. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07481-4

Copyright (c) 2025 Asce Patongloan, Ratnawati Prayogi, Freddy J. Rumambi, Alfred Inkriwang

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Asynchronous E-Learning Media Higher Education Participant Engagement PASIS
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC