Analysis of Students' Mathematical Literacy Skills after Participating in Differentiated Learning with the Outdoor Modeling Mathematics Model

https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.3929

Authors

  • Nida Nur Halimah Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi
  • Sofnidar Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-0708
  • Khairul Anwar Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-5371

Keywords:

Mathematical Literacy Skills , Differentiated Learning , Outdoor Modeling Mathematics

Abstract

Students’ mathematical literacy remains a persistent challenge across educational levels and continues to be a critical concern in mathematics education. This condition suggests that existing learning practices are largely dominated by conventional instructional approaches that do not adequately accommodate students’ diverse learning needs and readiness levels. The study aimed to analyze the mathematical literacy abilities of Grade VII junior high school students after participating in differentiated outdoor mathematics learning on integer topics. A mixed-methods research design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 25 students of Grade VII-B at SMP Negeri 17 Batanghari through the implementation of differentiated outdoor learning activities, supported by learning implementation observation sheets. Subsequently, qualitative data were gathered from six selected students to gain deeper insights into their mathematical literacy processes through analysis of test responses and semi-structured interviews. Mathematical literacy was assessed based on students’ performance on literacy-oriented test items and interview data. The results indicated that overall student completion reached 44%, with 20% of students categorized as having high mathematical literacy, 52% moderate literacy, and 28% low literacy. Further analysis based on students’ learning readiness showed that students with high readiness (S1KBT and S2KBT) achieved completion levels of 98.33% and 83.33%, respectively. Students with moderate readiness (S1KBS and S2KBS) attained 81.66% and 80%, while students with low readiness (S1KBR and S2KBR) reached 78.33% and 53.33%. These findings suggest that differentiated outdoor mathematics learning contributes to the development of students’ mathematical literacy across varying levels of learning readiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nida Nur Halimah, Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Sofnidar, Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Khairul Anwar, Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

References

Amin, NF, Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). General concepts of population and sample in research. Pilar, 14(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.26618/whw41w62

Aprima, D., & Sari, S. (2022). Analysis of the Application of Differentiated Learning in the Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Elementary School Mathematics Lessons. Cendikia: Media Scientific Journal of Education, 13 (1)(1), 95–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um009v32i12023p1-14

Dian Fitriani, Fatihatunnisa Ridha Rahman, Anti Dhamayanti Fauzi, Anisa Umu Salamah, & Asep Saefullah. (2023). Implementation of Differentiated Learning Based on Students' Learning Readiness Aspects in Senior High Schools. Genta Mulia Journal, 14(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61290/gm.v14i2.358

Dwi Lestari, R., & Nia Sania Effendi, K. (2022). Analysis of Junior High School Students' Mathematical Literacy Skills on Plane Shapes. Biormatika: Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, 8(1), 63–73. http://ejournal.unsub.ac.id/index.php/FKIP

Fazzilah, E., Effendi, KNS, & Marlina, R. (2020). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving PISA Problems with Uncertainty Content and Data. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.306

Harahap, SS, Elindra, R., & Ardiana, N. (2021). Analysis of Students' Creative Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematics Problems for Class X TKJ Students of Harapan Private Vocational School. MathEdu Journal (Mathematic Education Journal), 4(3), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.37081/mathedu.v4i3.2552

Hardani, Helmina Andriani, JU, Utami, EF, Istiqomah, RR, Fardani, RA, Sukmana, DJ, & Auliya, NH (2020). Qualitative Research Methods Book. In Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada (Vol. 5, Issue 1).

Harefa, A.D., Lase, S., & Zega, Y. (2023). The Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical Literacy Ability and Student Learning Outcomes. Educativo: Journal of Education, 2(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v2i1.96

Herwina, W. (2021). Optimizing Student Needs and Learning Outcomes with Differentiated Learning. Perspectives on Educational Sciences, 35(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.352.10

Ismawati, & Yuliastuti, R. (2024). Analysis of Students' Ability to Solve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Type Mathematics Problems. DEWANTARA Education Journal: Media for Communication, Creation, and Scientific Innovation in Education, 10(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.55933/jpd.v10i1.643

Kristiani, H., Susanti, E.I., Purnamasari, N., Purba, M., Saad, M.Y., & Anggaeni, A. (2021). Differentiated Learning Development Model. Center for Curriculum and Learning, Agency for Standards, Curriculum, and Educational Assessment, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v8i1.1301

Kurniawati, I., Purwati, & Mardiana, T. (2021). The Effect of Media-Assisted Outdoor Learning Methods. Borobudur Educational Review, 1(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.31603/bedr.4792

Mariamah, S., Yusri Bachtiar, M., & Indrawati. (2021). Implementation of Project-Based Learning to Improve Collaborative Skills in Early Childhood. Educational Professions, 2(1), 125–130. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JPK/article/view/27494

Maulyda, MA (2020). NCTM-Based Mathematics Learning Paradigm (Issue January).

Nafis, IA, & Zauri. (2023). Analysis of the Mathematical Literacy Ability of Grade X Students of Sman 1 Bantarkawung in Solving PISA-Oriented Problems Reviewed from Logical-Mathematical Intelligence and Cognitive Style. Journal of Research, Education, and Learning, 18(5), 1–13. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/view/19836/14787

Nurjanatin, I., Sugondo, G., & Manurung, MMH (2017). Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving Story Problems on the Surface Area of Cuboids in Class VIII–F Semester II of SMP Negeri 2 Jayapura. Scientific Journal of Mathematics and Its Learning, 2(1), 22–31. https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/JIMP/article/view/252

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Global Competence. https://www.oecd.org/oecd/reports

Oktaviyanthi, R., Agus, RN, & Supriani, Y. (2017). PISA Mathematics Framework in Exploring Student Mathematical Literacy Skills. INA-Rxiv, November 2017, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/z2qsf

Purba, M., Purnamasari, N., Soetantyo, S., Suwarma, IR, & Susanti, EI (2021). Principles of Differentiated Instruction Development in a Flexible Curriculum as a Manifestation of Independent Learning. Jakarta: Agency for Educational Standards, Curriculum, and Assessment, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Ridzkiyah & Effendi. (2021). Nur Ridzkiyah 1), Kiki Nia Sania Effendi 2). Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v6i1.8237

Rifqiyah, F., & Nugraheni, N. (2023). Analysis of Student Learning Readiness to Fulfill the Achievements of the Independent Curriculum with Differentiated Learning. Journal of Elementary Education Research (JRPD), 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.30595/jrpd.v4i2.16052

Silitonga, TAH, Purba, N., & Siahaan, TM (2022). The Effect of Outdoor Learning Methods on Students' Thematic Learning Outcomes in Subtheme 3 "Loving Plants" in Grade III of SD Negeri 122347 Pematangsiantar. Journal of Education and Counseling, 4(6), 1978–1988. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jpdk%0APengaruh

Sofnidar, Kamid, & Anwar, K. (2017). Syntax design of outdoor learning model based on modeling mathematics. Edumatica: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v7i02.4211

Susilawati, S., Pujiastuti, H., & Sukirwan, S. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability Reviewed from Students' Mathematical Self-Concept. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.244

Taqwan, B. (2019). The Effect of Outdoor Learning on the Problem-Solving Skills of Grade VII Students of SMP Negeri 05 Seluma. Raflesia Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.33449/jpmr.v4i1.7524

Utami, N., Sukestiyarno, YL, & Hidayah, I. (2020). Literacy Skills in Solving Story Problems of Grade IX Students A. Prisma, Proceedings of the National Mathematics Seminar, 3, 626–633. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/37679

Zulfirman, R. (2022). Implementation of the outdoor learning method to improve student learning outcomes in Islamic Religion subjects at MAN 1 Medan. Journal of Research, Education and Teaching: JPPP, 3(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v3i2.11758

Published

2026-01-17

How to Cite

Halimah, N. N., Sofnidar, S., & Anwar, K. (2026). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skills after Participating in Differentiated Learning with the Outdoor Modeling Mathematics Model. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.3929