Analysis of Students' Mathematical Thinking Skills in Trigonometry Learning through a Digital Worksheet Assisted by Virtual Reality

1 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya
Link Copied!

Mathematical thinking skills are skills that students need to master, particularly in trigonometry. This study aims to analyze and describe students’ mathematical thinking skills in trigonometry learning through Digital Worksheet assisted by Virtual Reality. The method used was qualitative descriptive. The research subjects consisted of 32 tenth-grade students at SMA N 1 Belitang. The research procedure consisted of three stages: preparation, implementation, and the final stage. Data were collected through Digital Worksheet assisted by Virtual Reality, written tests, and interviews. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: data reduction, grouping the data based on four indicators of mathematical thinking skills, and presenting the data based on the Digital Worksheet assisted by Virtual Reality, written tests, and interviews, followed by drawing conclusions. The results of using a Digital Worksheet assisted by Virtual Reality in the specializing activity showed that students were able to identify and explain known and requested information. In the generalizing activity, students were able to transform contextual situations into right triangles. In the conjecturing activity, students were able to make conjectures about the appropriate trigonometric ratios to solve problems. In the convincing activity, students were able to prove their conjectures through calculations and draw conclusions. Based on the written test results and interviews, 14 students with very good skills were able to accurately meet all four indicators of mathematical thinking, 17 students with good skills were able to meet all four indicators although still some errors caused by rushing and a lack of attention to detail, and 1 student with fairly good skills was better able to demonstrate the specializing indicator but still experienced difficulties with the generalizing, conjecturing, and convincing indicators. The results of this study indicate that Digital Worksheet assisted by Virtual Reality in trigonometry learning to support students’ mathematical thinking skills.

Nurhalita, N., Susanti, E., & Meryansumayeka, M. (2026). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills in Trigonometry Learning through a Digital Worksheet Assisted by Virtual Reality. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(4), 1644–1659. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i4.5916

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adhikari, T. N., & Subedi, A. (2021). Difficulties of grade x students in learning trigonometry. Siddhajyoti Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(01), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.3126/sij.v2i01.39243
  2. Adnan, M., Tek, W. W., Adenan, N. H., Bahurudin, M. A., Setambah, & Rusdin , N. M. (2024). Mathematical Thinking Among Pre-Service Teachers: A Critical Component of Teacher Preparation. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(4s), 1584–1594. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2218
  3. Afifah, N., Rachman, P., & Zairozie, A. Z. (2026). Enhancing students’ mathematical thinking skills through canva-based project-based learning. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i2.4944
  4. AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., & Al-Qahtani, M. (2023). SWOM Strategy and Influence of Its Using on Developing Mathematical Thinking Skills and on Metacognitive Thinking Among Gifted Tenth-Grade Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2238. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12994
  5. Amalia, N. R., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir matematis siswa berdasarkan taksonomi bloom dalam menyelesaikan soal relasi dan fungsi. HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v7i1.2606
  6. Assidiqi, H., & Sugiman, S. (2026). Augmented and virtual reality for abstract mathematical visualization: A systematic review of cognitive outcomes. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v11i3.1154
  7. Audina, C. P., Susanti, E., & Aisyah, N. (2025). Development of inquiry-based digital worksheet to improve mathematical thinking ability. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i2.10811
  8. Basir, M. A., Agustyani, M., & Maharani, H. R. (2024). Innovative trigonometry learning: The role of liveworksheets-assisted interactive worksheets in improving numerical literacy: innovative trigonometry learning. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(3), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i3.2366
  9. Çakıroğlu, Ü., & Muştuoğlu, E. (2025). Mathematical thinking behind coding: Promoting generalization skills via scratch. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(7), 2375–2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10556-9
  10. Chen, T. L., Lee, Y. C., & Hung, C. S. (2022). A Study on The Effects of Digital Learning Sheet Design Strategy on The Learning Motivation and Learning Outcomes of Museum Exhibition Visitors. Education Sciences, 12(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020135
  11. DeJarnette, A. F., & Hord, C. (2022). Mathematics questioning practices of pre-service special education teachers providing algebra tutoring for students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 45(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211073573
  12. Delima, N., Kusumah, Y. S., & Fatimah, S. (2021). Capaian kemampuan mathematical thinking siswa melalui model comprehensive mathematics instructions. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2793
  13. Fauzi, N. I., Sagita, L., Setiyani, & Wicaksono, B. (2022). Analysis of student errors in solving trigonometry problems based on the newman procedure. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol7no1.2022pp1-14
  14. Ferdianto, F., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Widowati, & Junaedi, I. (2025). Analysis mathematical thinking skills in three-dimensional shapes using the study saster modle. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 23(1). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00460
  15. Hanifah, Lestari, W.D., Roesdiana, L., & Hidayati, N. (2026) Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Teori Mason. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 11(1), 9–20.
  16. https://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v10i1.21334.
  17. Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Hamidah, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). How can android-based trigonometry learning improve the math learning process? Frontiers in Education, 7, 1101161. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1101161
  18. Hunter, J., & Miller, J. (2022). The use of cultural contexts for patterning tasks: Supporting young diverse students to identify structures and generalise. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(6), 1349–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01386-y
  19. Ibrahim, H., Tunku Ahmad, T. B., & Isa, N. (2023, December). Exploring Malaysian Students’ Mathematical Thinking Skills. In Forum Paedagogik (Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 187-209). https://doi.org/10.24952/paedagogik.v14i2.9518
  20. Istihapsari, V., & Kusuma, J. W. (2026). Transformation of junior high school mathematics learning: Integration of interactive student worksheet and virtual reality based on deep learning approach. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 10(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v10i1.33737
  21. Jamiludin, Moh. F., Suwito, A., Susanto, & Frenza. (2025). Analysis of students specializing and generalizing thinking in three-dimensional geometry. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 11(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v11i1.23346
  22. Jawad, L. F., Majeed, B. H., & ALRikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The Impact of CATs on Mathematical Thinking and Logical Thinking Among Fourth-Class Scientific Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(10), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i10.22515
  23. Lara-Alvarez, C. A., Parra-González, E. F., Ortiz-Esparza, M. A., & Cardona-Reyes, H. (2023). Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Elementary School: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569
  24. Lestari, A. O., Susanti, E., & Hartono, Y. (2022). Pengembangan Digital Worksheet pada Materi Transformasi Geometri untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 2915-2928.https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.6160
  25. Lorenza, N., Sudirman, S., & Susiswo, S. (2024). Students’ specializing thinking in solving arithmetic sequence and series problems. PRISMA, 13(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i1.3930
  26. Madadina, Z. R., Hadiprasetyo, K., & Hadianto, U. (2024). Penerapan problem based learning melalui pendekatan tutor sebaya dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar matematika pada materi trigonometri. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1565
  27. Maghfiroh, F., Dasari, D., Dahlan, J. A., Inayah, C. F., & Fitriyah, Y. (2024). Students’ ways of understanding and ways of thinking in solving trigonometric problems. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 12(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i2.18833
  28. Mansor, S. N. A., Samsudin, N., & Ahmad Shukri, F. N. (2021). Newman’s error analysis of common errors in solving convergence of power series using ratio test. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), Pages 888-898. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/11077
  29. Monteleone, C., Miller, J., & Warren, E. (2023). Conceptualising Critical Mathematical Thinking in Young Students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(2), 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00445-1
  30. Nuha, M. ’Azmi, & Panlaan, J. M. R. (2026). Analysis of mathematics students’ mathematical thinking based on learning styles. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v14i1.22658
  31. Obeng, B. A., Banson, G. M., Owusu, E., & Owusu, R. (2024). Analysis of senior high school students’ errors in solving trigonometry. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2385119. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2385119
  32. Oktaviyanthi, R., & Sholahudin, U. (2023). Phet assisted trigonometric worksheet for students’ trigonometric adaptive thinking. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.779
  33. Orhak, S., & Çağıltay, K. (2024). Unlocking The Potential of Virtual Reality in Education: Insights from Teachers and Recommendations for Integration. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1419279
  34. Rahman, M. R., Nurhalita, N., Sindi, S., Hartono, Y., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2026). Junior high school students’ mathematical thinking ability on set theory material based on the apos theory. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v16i1.51317
  35. Sabanal, R. M., & Guevara, A. A. (2025). Students’ Errors in Solving Word Problems Involving Angles of Elevation and Depression and Performance Level in Grade 9 Trigonometry: Basis for Development of A Teacher-Made Material. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, 14(3), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140300026
  36. Satria, D., Zulhiddah, Z., & Zulkifli, N. A. (2025). Developing Digital Worksheet Based on Project Based Learning Model to Enhance Writing Ability of Junior High School Student. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(1), 1400-1414. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i1.17495
  37. Shidqiya, A. I., & Sukestiyarno, S. (2022). Analysis of students’ mathematical thinking ability in terms of self efficacy. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v11i3.58772
  38. Singh, P., Nasir, N. A. M., & Hoon, T. S. (2024). The Cognitive Gap in The Mathematical Thinking Abilities of High School Leavers for College: Are They Ready?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), em2529. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15577
  39. Singh, P., Teoh, S. H., Nasir, N. A. M., Cheong, T. H., & Rasid, N. M. (2022). An Assessment of High School Leavers' Development of Mathematical Thinking. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI8), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI8.3907
  40. Sugianto, A., Rosjanuardi, R., & Lukman, L. (2024). Strategies and representation employed by primary school students in a functional relationship: A focus on generalization process. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(4), 2013–2028. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i4.pp2013-2028
  41. Susanti, E., Delfi, I., Hapizah, H., Indaryanti, I., Isrok’atun, I., & Simarmata, R. H. (2024). Designing number pattern questions to assess students with kinesthetic learning styles’ in mathematical thinking. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 8(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v8i1.9998
  42. Sutarto, Dwi Hastuti, I., Fuster-Guillén, D., Palacios Garay, J. P., Hernández, R. M., & Namaziandost, E. (2022). The effect of problem-based learning on metacognitive ability in the conjecturing process of junior high school students. Education Research International, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2313448
  43. Tsaaqib, A., Buchori, A., & Endahwuri, D. (2022). Efektivitas penggunaan media pembelajaran Virtual Reality (VR) pada materi trigonometri terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar matematika siswa sma. JIPMat, 7(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v7i1.9950
  44. Utaminingsih, S., Amalia, I., & Sumaji, S. (2024). Management of mathematics learning based on interactive digital worksheets to improve students’ critical thinking ability. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p159
  45. Vroom, K., & Ellis, B. (2024). Sociomathematical scaffolding as students engage in revising draft definitions, conjectures, and proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10294-1
  46. Wardhani, T. A. W., & Argaswari, D. P. A. D. (2022). High school students’ error in solving word problem of trigonometry based on newman error hierarchical model. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p87-102
Dimension Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles