Development of Bilingual Teaching Materials for Logical Reasoning Through Visual Studio Code
https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4423
Keywords:
Bilingual Teaching Materials , Visual Studio Code , Mathematical Logical Reasoning , Research and Development (R&D)Abstract
The demands of 21st-century learning emphasize strengthening logical reasoning and digital literacy, while schools and Islamic boarding schools still lack technology-based bilingual teaching materials that are proven to be valid, practical, and effective..This study aims to develop and test the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of bilingual teaching materials (Indonesian and Arabic) on the subject of Two-Variable Linear Equation Systems (SPLDV) through Visual Studio Code (VS Code) to improve students' mathematical logical reasoning. This research is motivated by the low ability of students' mathematical logical reasoning and the limitations of innovative learning resources that integrate bilingual aspects and digital technology. The method used is Research and Development (R&D) with the ADDIE model, implemented on grade VIII students at Darul Falah Islamic Boarding School and Nashihuddin Islamic Junior High School in Bandar Lampung. The results of the study show that the teaching materials developed are declared Very Valid/Very Appropriate based on expert assessments (material experts 96.88%, media experts 87.5%, and language experts 100%) and are considered Interesting (practical) by students with an average positive response above 80%. Furthermore, the effectiveness test proved that the use of bilingual teaching materials based on Visual Studio Code was significant in improving mathematical logical reasoning, as evidenced by the average N-gain value which was in the medium category (Small Trial 0.563 and Large Trial 0.596). Thus, it can be concluded that bilingual teaching materials through Visual Studio Code are feasible, practical, and effective to be used as a learning innovation to improve students' mathematical logical reasoning abilities.
Downloads
References
Alqahtani, M. M., & Powell, A. B. (2017). Mediational activities in a dynamic geometry environment and teachers’ specialized content knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48(February), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.004
Björklund, C., & Palmér, H. (2022). Teaching toddlers the meaning of numbers—connecting modes of mathematical representations in book reading. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(3), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10147-3
David, E. J., Roh, K. H., & Sellers, M. E. (2018). Value-thinking and location-thinking: Two ways students visualize points and think about graphs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, (August), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.09.004
Dello Iacono, U., Pierri, A., & Taranto, E. (2024). Peer Review Methodology in a Blended Course for Mathematics Teacher Education. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v26.2.01
González-Calero, J. A., Berciano, A., & Arnau, D. (2020). The role of language on the reversal error. A study with bilingual Basque-Spanish students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1681100
Habibi, H., & Suparman, S. (2020). Literasi Matematika dalam Menyambut PISA 2021 Berdasarkan Kecakapan Abad 21. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.8177
Harris, D., Logan, T., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Spatial visualization and measurement of area: A case study in spatialized mathematics instruction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70(May 2022), 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101038
Hein, K., & Prediger, S. (2024). Scaffolds for seeing, using, and articulating logical structures in proofs: Design research study with high school students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 74(April), 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101123
Khozaei, S. A., Zare, N. V., Moneghi, H. K., Sadeghi, T., & Taraghdar, M. M. (2022). Effects of quantum-learning and conventional teaching methods on learning achievement, motivation to learn, and retention among nursing students during critical care nursing education. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00198-7
Klein, S., & Leikin, R. (2020). Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: what do teachers do and feel? Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09983-y
Kontorovich, I. (2020). Theorems or procedures? Exploring undergraduates’ methods to solve routine problems in linear algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00272-3
Lee, H. S., Sanei, H., Famularo, L., Masters, J., Bradshaw, L., & Schellman, M. (2023). Validating a concept inventory for measuring students’ probabilistic reasoning: The case of reasoning within the context of a raffle. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 71(June), 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101081
Listiawati, N., Sabon, S. S., Siswantari, Subijanto, Wibowo, S., Zulkardi, & Riyanto, B. (2023). Analysis of implementing Realistic Mathematics Education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700
Moring, T., Husband, C., Lojander-Visapää, C., Vincze, L., Fomina, J., & Mänty, N. N. (2011). Media use and ethnolinguistic vitality in bilingual communities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.541918
Nugroho, P. B., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., Sisworo, Hidayanto, E., & Susiswo. (2018). Critical thinking disposition: Students skeptic in dealing with ill-logical mathematics problem. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11343a
Patahuddin, S. M., Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., & Bholoa, A. (2022). Subtleties in spatial visualization maneuvers: Insights from numerical solutions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67(June 2021), 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100988
Qadry, I. K., Dessa, A., & Aynul, N. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Konten Space and Shape Pada Kelas IX SMP Negeri 13 Makassar. Jurnal Matematika Dan Aplikasinya, 2(2).
Regier, P., & Savic, M. (2020). How teaching to foster mathematical creativity may impact student self-efficacy for proving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57(September 2018), 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100720
Rohimah, S. M., Darhim, D., & Juandi, D. (2022). A local instructional theory (LIT) for teaching linear equation through STEM instruction. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.4727
Safrudiannur, & Rott, B. (2019). The different mathematics performances in PISA 2012 and a curricula comparison: enriching the comparison by an analysis of the role of problem solving in intended learning processes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0248-4
Sochanski, M. (2018). What is diagrammatic reasoning in mathematics? Logic and Logical Philosophy, 27(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2018.001
Stewart, S., Troup, J., & Plaxco, D. (2019). Reflection on teaching linear algebra: examining one instructor’s movements between the three worlds of mathematical thinking. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1253–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01086-0
Talib, S. A., Nasri, N. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2024). Evidence of the need for developing an integrated model of mathematics teachers’ readiness as agents of change. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i3.5923
Tallman, M. A., & Frank, K. M. (2020). Angle measure, quantitative reasoning, and instructional coherence: an examination of the role of mathematical ways of thinking as a component of teachers’ knowledge base. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9409-3
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015 (Indonesia’s PISA Results in 2018 are Lower than 2015). Open Science Framework, 2.
Zandieh, M., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2019). Symbolizing while solving linear systems. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1183–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01083-3
Zulkardi, Meryansumayeka, Putri, R. I. I., Alwi, Z., Nusantara, D. S., Ambarita, S. M., Maharani, Y., & Puspitasari, L. (2020). How students work with pisa-like mathematical tasks using covid-19 context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12915.405-416
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 This is an open-access under the CC-BY-SA license
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@gmail.com, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com
Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
