Deep Learning Approach and Students’ Numeracy Skills: The Roles of Mathematical Disposition and Gender

https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i4.4348

Authors

  • Namaera Anggeraini Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Ahmad Nasrullah Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-5530
  • Yandika Nugraha Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-6589

Keywords:

Deep Learning , Numeracy Literacy , Mathematical Disposition , Gender

Abstract

International and national assessments, including PISA 2022, indicate that Indonesian students’ numeracy performance remains low. This situation highlights the need for instructional approaches that strengthen conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking. This study examined the effect of a deep-learning instructional approach on eighth-grade students’ numeracy skills, while considering mathematical disposition and gender. We employed a non-equivalent control group quasi-experimental design with 62 Grade 8 students from a public junior high school in West Lombok, Indonesia. The experimental group (n = 31) received deep-learning instruction through concept exploration, context-based discussion, collaborative problem solving, and guided reflection, while the control group (n = 31) received regular instruction. Instruments included a numeracy test and a mathematical disposition questionnaire that underwent expert validation and met reliability criteria. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA, controlling for baseline ability (pretest). The results showed higher numeracy scores in the experimental group across disposition categories. ANCOVA indicated significant main effects of instructional approach, gender, and mathematical disposition, whereas several interaction effects were not significant. These findings support the use of deep-learning instruction as a promising strategy to strengthen numeracy within the Merdeka Curriculum implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Namaera Anggeraini, Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Ahmad Nasrullah, Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Yandika Nugraha, Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Department of Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

References

Arumdalu Tri Pangesti, S. S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Materi. 05(02), 1769–1781.

Aryanto, S. (2025). Pembelajaran Literasi Dan Numerasi Melalui Deep Learning : Pendekatan Transformasional. 49–57.

Baubesy, N., & Ramadhan, N. R. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMA PGRI 2 Tamalate Ditinjau Dari Gender. 1(1), 21–29.

Efendi, R., Diana, Y., & Panjaitan, A. T. (2025). Analisis Disposisi Matematis, Kecemasan Matematika, dan Numerasi Siswa di Daerah 3T: Perbatasan RI-PNG. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v9i2.3967

Fitriani, A. (2025). Analisis Literatur : Pendekatan Pembelajaran Deep Learning Dalam Pendidikan. 2(3), 50–57.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Han, W., Susanto, D., Dewayani, S., Pandora, P., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi., Nento, M. N., & Akbari, Q. S. (2017). “Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi.” Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Tim GLN Kemendikbud., 8(9), 1–58. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/11628/1/materi-pendukung-literasi-numerasi-rev.pdf

Hendrianty, B. J., Ibrahim, A., Iskandar, S., & Mulyasari, E. (2024). Membangun Pola Pikir Deep Learning Guru Sekolah Dasar. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v12i3.96699

Izzati, N. (2017). Belajar Geometri Bidang Datar Mahasiswa Iain Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. EduMa, 6(2).

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Literasi Membaca, Peringkat Indonesia di PISA 2022. Laporan Pisa Kemendikbudristek, 1–25.

Khoirunnisa, S., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Smp Pada Era Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(3), 925–936. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17393

Kurniawati, I., Setiawan, A., Anwar, M. S., & Muhammad, I. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Disposisi Matematika Siswa Pada Materi SPLDV. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, 1(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.61650/jptk.v1i2.200

Mayratih, G. E., Leton, S. I., & Uskono, I. V. (2019). Pengaruh Disposisi Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Asimtot : Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 1(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.30822/asimtot.v1i1.97

Natsir, S. R. (2025). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar: Studi Deskriptif Pendekatan Deep Learning Dalam Kerangka Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar.

Nelvia, S. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Sosiolinguistik. Bahasa Indonesia, 17, 87–98.

Ningsih, R. T. C., Utomo, R. B., & R, S. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 13(2), 92–102.

Rohim, D. C. (2021). Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 33(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993

Rokhimah, S. (2015). Patriarkhisme Dan Ketidakadilan Gender. Muwazah, 6(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v6i1.440

Soemarmo, H. &. (2019). Pengaruh Disposisi Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Asimtot : Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 1(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.30822/asimtot.v1i1.97

Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D, 2017

Sukaryo, A. F., & Sari, R. M. M. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 8(2), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v8i2.8212

Suryaprani, M. W., Suparta, I. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2016). Hubungan Jenis Kelamin, Literasi Matematika, dan Disposisi Matematika terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik SMA Negeri di Denpasar. Seminar Nasional FMIPA Undiksha, 39–46.

Suwandi, Putri, R., & Sulastri. (2024). Inovasi Pendidikan dengan Menggunakan Model Deep Learning di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Politik, 2(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.61476/186hvh28

Wahyudi, D. A., Medan, U. N., & Learning, D. (2025). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Deep Learning Terhadap. 1(1), 9–17.

Widoyo, H., Rofi’i, A., Jahrir, A. S., Rasimin, R., Purhanudin, M. V., & Sitopu, J. W. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Aktif Inovatif Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1687–1699. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3133

Wijaya, M. (2025). Kurikulum Deep Learning di Indonesia ; Sebuah Harapan. 1(1), 10–15.

Wirawan, N., Yuhana, Y., & Fatah, A. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Bentuk Literasi Numerasi AKM pada Konten Bilangan Ditinjau dari Disposisi Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2715–2728. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2623

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Anggeraini, N., Nasrullah, A., & Nugraha, Y. (2025). Deep Learning Approach and Students’ Numeracy Skills: The Roles of Mathematical Disposition and Gender. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(4), 1672–1683. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i4.4348