The Performances of Synchronous and Asynchronous Method in Teaching and Learning English

Jessy Ayu Pratiwi 1 Indonesia , Nadya Rosalina 1 Indonesia , Nursalimah Rodiah 1 Indonesia , Wiwin Ervina 1 Indonesia
1 Department of English Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru
Link Copied!
Published 2021-12-27
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021) PAGES 46-57
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.53
Views / Downloads 596 1824

This article aims to explain the synchronous and asynchronous methods as distance learning methods, especially in learning English. In the background section, the reasons for the current teaching and learning process problems are explained and why synchronous and asynchronous are good learning methods. Next, the method used in this study is described. Then, explained about synchronous and asynchronous in more detail. Last, conclusion as the closing of the journal.

Pratiwi, J. A., Rosalina, N. ., Rodiah, N. ., & Ervina, W. (2021). The Performances of Synchronous and Asynchronous Method in Teaching and Learning English. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.53
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners' discourse functions. Computers & Education, 62, 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.013
  2. Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., & Marzulina, L. (2018). " If our English isn't a language, what is it?" Indonesian EFL Student Teachers' Challenges Speaking English. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 129-145.
  3. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
  4. Chen, Y., Liu, C., & Wong, R. (2007). The adoption of synchronous and asynchronous media in the teaching of a second language. Issues in Information Systems, 3(1), 217-223.
  5. Chou, C. C. (2002). A comparative content analysis of student interaction in synchronous and asynchronous learning networks. In Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1795-1803). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994093
  6. Dewey, J. (1998). The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democracy (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press.
  7. Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.
  8. Finkelstein, J. E. (2006). Learning in real time: Synchronous teaching and learning online (Vol. 5). John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Fitch, D., Cary, S., & Freese, R. (2016). Facilitating social work role plays in online courses: The use of video conferencing. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 78-92.
  10. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30-50.
  11. Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2018). Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning quality in developing countries university settings. International journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1).
  12. Hong, Z. R., Lin, H. S., & Lawrenz, F. P. (2012). Effects of an integrated science and societal implication intervention on promoting adolescents’ positive thinking and emotional perceptions in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 329-352.
  13. Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2012). The impact of asynchronous e-learning tools on interaction and learning in a blended course. International journal of instructional media, 39(2).
  14. Johnson, G. M. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends, 50(4), 46-53.
  15. Keegan, D. (2013). Teaching and learning by satellite in a European virtual classroom. In Open and distance learning today (pp. 124-134). Routledge.
  16. Lee, M. J., & McLoughlin, C. (Eds.). (2010). Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. IGI Global.
  17. Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.
  18. Libasin, Z., Azudin, R. A., Idris, M. A., Rahman, M. S. A., & Umar, N. (2021). Comparison of Students' Academic Performance in Mathematics Course with Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning Environments during COVID-19 Crisis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 492-501.
  19. Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.019
  20. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
  21. Mick, C. S., & Middlebrook, G. (2015). Asynchronous and synchronous modalities. Foundational practices of online writing instruction, 129-148.
  22. Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1339-1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.008
  23. Moser, S., & Smith, P. (2015). Benefits of Synchronous Online Courses. Association Supporting Computer Users in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571270
  24. Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583-591.
  25. Nazir, M. (1988). MetodePenelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  26. Negash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2008). E-learning classifications: Differences and similarities. In Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous information technology education (pp. 1-23). IGI Global.
  27. Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39.
  28. Pfister, H. R. (2005). How to support synchronous net-based learning discourses: Principles and perspectives. In Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 39-57). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24319-4_3
  29. Pfister, H. R., & Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net‐based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00287.x
  30. Salomon, G. (2012). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. Routledge.
  31. Shahabadi, M. M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453
  32. Schoenfeld-Tacher, R. M., & Dorman, D. C. (2021). Effect of Delivery Format on Student Outcomes and Perceptions of a Veterinary Medicine Course: Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Learning. Veterinary sciences, 8(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8020013
  33. Serdyukov, P. (2020). Asynchronous/Synchronous learning chasm. In Exploring Online Learning Through Synchronous and Asynchronous Instructional Methods (pp. 1-33). IGI Global.
  34. Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
  35. Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher education, 18(2), 69-84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ858506
  36. Spiceland, D., & Hawkins, C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 68-75.
  37. Tabatabaei, O., & Sharifi, R. (2011). Online discussion: self-repair enhancement of EFL learners. Theory and practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 837-846.
  38. Trudgill, P., & Hannah, J. (2013). International English: A guide to the varieties of standard English. Routledge.
  39. Watson, J. (2008). Blended Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education. Promising Practices in Online Learning. North American Council for Online Learning.

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Methods Synchronous and asynchronous Teaching and learning English