Application of Service Duel Approach to Improve High Secondary School Students' Badminton Backhand Serve Accuracy

1 Department of Physical Education and Sports, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Link Copied!

Low psychomotor skill levels in badminton backhand serves remain a persistent challenge in high school physical education due to monotonous, teacher-centered instructional approaches. This Classroom Action Research (CAR) investigated the effectiveness of the Service Duel Approach—a paired, game-based competitive framework—in improving backhand serve accuracy, technical understanding, and learning engagement among 24 ninth-grade students at High Secondary School YP PGRI 1 Makassar (selected via purposeful sampling). Guided by the Kemmis and McTaggart action research cycle, data were collected over two cycles using a validated zone-based psychomotor service test (content validity index CVI = 0.88, inter-rater reliability ICC = 0.91), a cognitive understanding test (KR-20 = 0.84), and a structured affective observation sheet. Baseline observations indicated severe deficit, with only 12.50% of participants achieving the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKTP ≥ 80; M = 68.00). Following Cycle I interventions, mastery reached 41.67% (M = 74.50). With refined targeted corrective feedback, basic mechanical drills, and peer assessment in Cycle II, 100.00% of participants met the mastery threshold (M = 83.42). While the 100% completion rate reflects specific classroom success within the CAR framework, potential novelty effects and short evaluation windows represent acknowledged study boundaries. The findings demonstrate that structured gamified duels successfully optimize psychomotor coordination and motor learning.

Nitit, F. S., Suwardi, S., & Hanafi, S. (2026). Application of Service Duel Approach to Improve High Secondary School Students’ Badminton Backhand Serve Accuracy . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 6(1), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v6i1.5179

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abedanzadeh, R., Becker, K., & Mousavi, S. M. R. (2022). Both a holistic and external focus of attention enhance the learning of a badminton short serve. Psychological Research, 86(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01475-9
  2. Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., Mayo, A. M., & Steel, K. A. (2019). Enhancing motor skill acquisition with augmented feedback. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice, 3, 3-19.
  3. Anwar, N. I. A., Hamzah, A., & Aksir, M. I. (2024). Fitness Education Model to Improve Learning Achievement of PJOK Subjects: A Focus Senior High School Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 3(4), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v3i4.2277
  4. Breed, R., Lindsay, R., Kittel, A., & Spittle, M. (2025). Content and quality of comparative tactical game-centered approaches in physical education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 293-336. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241227236
  5. Carboch, J., & Ďurčo, D. (2025). Effect of visual feedback on the badminton serve accuracy in training and match conditions. Physical Activity Review, 13(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2025.13.03
  6. Crook, T. S., Abdulzahra, S. J., & Sami, M. M. (2026). The Effect of Game-Based Learning Using Small-Sided Games on the Performance of the High Serve Skill in Badminton among Beginner Female Students. Journal of Physical Education (20736452), 38(2), 2315. https://doi.org/10.37359/JOPE.V38(2)2026.2454
  7. Duncan, M. J., Chan, C. K., Clarke, N. D., Cox, M., & Smith, M. (2017). The effect of badminton-specific exercise on badminton short-serve performance in competition and practice climates. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1203362
  8. Ezeddine, G., Souissi, N., Abaidia, R., Masmoudi, L., Trabelsi, K., Ammar, A., ... & Mrayah, M. (2025). Game-based physical education: a pathway to increased student motivation and greater learning outcomes. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1531651). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1531651
  9. Gustian, U., & Pranata, R. (2025). Game-Centered Approaches in Primary Physical Education: A Systematic Review of Implementation and Learning Outcomes. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 25(5), 1279-1289. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.5.27
  10. Harvey, S., Pill, S., & Almond, L. (2018). Old wine in new bottles: a response to claims that teaching games for understanding was not developed as a theoretically based pedagogical framework. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(2), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1359526
  11. Heidorn, B. (2024). Teaching a Successful Badminton Unit: Skills and Strategies for Secondary Physical Education. Strategies, 37(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2023.2277107
  12. Irvan, I. (2024). Performance-Based Assessment for Learning in Middle Schools: Physical Education, Sports and Health. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 3(4), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v3i4.2353
  13. Juniarisca, D. L., Wijaya, A., Bimantoro, A. P., Putera, S. H. P., Yudhistira, D., Virama, L. O. A., & Saputra, Y. D. (2026). Article RETRACTED due to malpractice Exploring the long-term retention of badminton skills: a comparison between command and reciprocal teaching styles. Retos, 74, 891-900. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v74.117922
  14. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R., & MacTaggart, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (Vol. 200). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
  15. Li, Q. Z., Fang, Q., Zhao, X. T., & Peng, W. (2024). Motor ability development by integrating small-sided games into physical education class. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1259924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1259924
  16. Iino, Y., Wilkie, J. C., Fukashiro, S., Yoshioka, S., & Vial, S. (2025). Two strategies to improve stability in a precision-based task: Insights from the badminton short serve. Journal of biomechanics, 113059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.113059
  17. Mahedero, M. P., Calderón, A., Hastie, P., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2021). Grouping students by skill level in mini-volleyball: Effect on game performance and knowledge in sport education. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1851-1871. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211021812
  18. Maksum, A., Mutohir, T. C., & Pawiro, S. (2026). Sport Development Index: A New Measure and Strategic Policy in Sport and Its Relation to Human Capital Investment in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/27690148.2025.2605956
  19. Manninen, M., Magrum, E., Campbell, S., & Belton, S. (2025). The effect of game-based approaches on decision-making, knowledge, and motor skill: A systematic review and a multilevel meta-analysis. European Physical Education Review, 31(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241245305
  20. Meilanisa, M., Makmur, M., & Amin, M. A. (2026). Educandy Educational Game-Based TGT Learning Model: Students' Interests and Learning Achievement. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(2), 1145-1160. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4534
  21. Perdima, F. E., Sofyan, D., & Sulastio, A. (2026). A research and development study of a game-based learning model: Effects on basketball skills and engagement in physical education. Journal Sport Area, 11(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2026.vol11(1).21684
  22. Pratama, S. A., Susila, L., & Mc Clintock, E. (2026). Game-based learning approach to enhance tactical understanding and motivation in school football physical education. INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review, 7(01), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v7i01.163
  23. Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in human behavior, 63, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
  24. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  25. Setyawan, P. B., Kamadi, L., & Haeruddin, S. (2022). Efforts to Improve the Quality of Movement Activities of Physical Education, Sports and Health, During the Covid-19 Pandemic. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i1.315
  26. Skrzeba, C., & Vogt, T. (2018). A cross-educational approach on skill-related movement technique performance: Central neuronal motor behaviour preceding the short badminton backhand serve. Neuroscience letters, 686, 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.005
  27. Sutikno, J., Suharjana, S., & Nasrulloh, A. (2025). The impact of three-level differentiated instruction on junior high school students' badminton performance. Sport TK: revista euroamericana de ciencias del deporte, (14), 159. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10578942
  28. Syah, H. (2025). Mapping the research landscape of game-centred approaches in physical education: a bibliometric analysis. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education, 6(2), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.25299/esijope.2025.vol6(2).19445
  29. Wang, Y., Zhou, D., Liu, C., Long, L., & Cheng, G. (2025). Physical-intellectual badminton teaching intervention for children with intellectual disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1445620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445620
  30. Zhou, S. (2024). Gamifying language education: The impact of digital game-based learning on Chinese EFL learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1518. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04073-3

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles