STAD Learning Model and Learning Styles: Learning Outcomes of Fifth-Grade Students at Primary School

Jela A. Rahawarin 1 Indonesia , Samuel P. Ritiauw 1 Indonesia , Leonid Ritiauw 1 Indonesia
1 Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pattimura
Link Copied!
Published 2026-03-28
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026) PAGES 1342-1355
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4595
Views / Downloads 139 111

Use of less diverse learning models and neglect of students' learning styles can lead to inferior social studies learning outcomes in elementary school children and a lack of classroom participation. This study examines how the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) learning model and learning styles affect fifth-grade social studies learning results in Primary School 2 Latihan Ambon. This experiment used a 2x3 factorial analysis and a posttest-only control group. All Primary School 2 Latihan Ambon pupils were studied, with 42 students divided into an experimental class (22 students) using the STAD model and a control class (20 students) using the TGT model, which stands for Teams Games Tournament, another cooperative learning model. A validated learning style questionnaire and learning outcome test were employed. Data was evaluated with a two-way ANOVA. The research findings showed that: (1) The STAD learning model had a significant effect on student learning outcomes (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05), with the average score of the experimental class (81.667) higher than the control class (63.267). (2) Learning styles have a significant influence on learning outcomes (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05), where students with visual learning styles achieved the highest score (84.400), followed by kinesthetic (69.800) and auditory (63.200). (3) There is a significant interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning outcomes (Sig. 0.002 < 0.05). This study helps educators map student learning styles before choosing a model. These findings also support the STAD cooperative model's ability to boost primary school social studies material achievement.

Rahawarin, J. A., Ritiauw, S. P., & Ritiauw, L. (2026). STAD Learning Model and Learning Styles: Learning Outcomes of Fifth-Grade Students at Primary School. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(2), 1342–1355. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i2.4595
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ali, Z. R., Idawati, I., & Suardi, S. (2025). Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model: Elementary School Students' Social Studies Learning Outcomes. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 4(4), 1456-1465. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3904
  2. Aningsih, Sugiharti, R. E., & Uhrifah, A. (2023). Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasa. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i6.6342
  3. Anisensia, T., Bito, G. S., & Wali, M. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Abstrak informasi yang diperoleh dari kegiatan gambaran tentang suatu keadaan atau masalah , sehari-hari maupun dalam kemajuan IPTEK set. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v1i1.351
  4. Arifin, K. (2022). Cooperative learning on the academic achievement of middle-school students based on learning style. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.175
  5. Asmedy. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian Dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.54371/ainj.v2i2.41
  6. Aswanto, F., Yusri, F., & Kurniawan, H. (2024). Analisis Gaya Belajar VAK ( Visual , Auditorial , Kinestetik ) Siswa di MTsN 4 Pasaman Barat Fitri Aswanto Fadhilla Yusri Haji Kurniawan. Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2104
  7. Azis, F. R. N., Pamujo, & Yuwono, P. H. (2020). Analisis Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik Siswa Berprestasi di SD Negeri Ajibarang Wetan. Jurnal Mahasiswa BK An-Nur : Berbeda, Bermakna, Mulia, 6(1), 26–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.31602/jmbkan.v6i1.2658
  8. Dewi, D. A. P., Arnyana, I. B. P., & Gading, I. K. (2025). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Berbantuan Media Konkret Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPAS Ditinjau dari Motivasi Berprestasi. Journal of Education Action Research, 9(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v9i2.91900
  9. Ervilia, S., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Implementasi Pendekatan Kooperatif dan Kolaboratif Berbasis Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(01), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i01.3837
  10. Evianti, T. H., T, A. Y., & Halidjah, S. (2023). Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbantuan Media Audiovisual terhadap Hasil Belajar Tematik Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. As-Sabiqun, 5(5), 1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v5i5.3919
  11. Ghufron, S., Nafiah, Syahruddin, Kaswadi, & Mustofa. (2023). The Effect of STAD-Type Cooperative Learning Based on a Learning Tool on Critical Thinking Ability in Writing Materials. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1614a
  12. Hazmiwati. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas II Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Primary Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 7(1), 57. https://primary.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JPFKIP/article/view/1038
  13. Hidayat, B. (2020). Tinjauan Historis Pendidikan Ips Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia, 4(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.23887/pips.v4i2.3493
  14. Jesmita. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad ( Student Teams Achievement Divisions ). Jurnal Basicedu, 3(4), 2137–2143. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v3i4.291
  15. Kusumawardani, N., Siswanto, J., & Purnamasari, V. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbantuan Media Poster Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i2.15487
  16. Lisnawati, T., Suroyo, & Pribadi, B. B. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kelompok dan Problem Based Learning pada Studi Sosial terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3(2), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2521
  17. Lisnawati, T., Suroyo, & Pribadi, B. A. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kelompok dan Problem Based Learning pada Studi Sosial terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2912–2921. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2521
  18. Mandopa, A. S., Alwendi, Budiarti, L., & Puspita, N. R. (2025). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Lingkungan. TechLINK: Jurnal Ilmiah Lingkungan, 9(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.59134/jtnk.v9i1.679
  19. Marheni, N. K., Jampel, i N., & Suwatra, I. I. W. (2020). Model STAD Berpengaruh terhadap Sikap Sosial dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 4, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v4i3.27414
  20. Mujazi. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 1(05), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v1i05.76
  21. Muslim, F., Ekawarna, E., Ramalia, A., Wirayuda, R. P., & Chen, D. (2022). Learning intensity and visual learning style on learning outcomes. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i2.40312
  22. Novianti, A., Bentri, A., & Zikri, A. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3(2), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.323
  23. Okpomoh, A. P., Peter, D. O., & Clifford, O. E. (2025). Correlation among Mother Tongue, Socio-Economic Status and Academic Performance of Social Studies Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 4(3), 900-911. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i3.3066
  24. Parwati, S. (2024). Analisi Gaya Belajar Visual, Ouditori dan Kinestetik Dalam Pengembangan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Al-Qur’an Hadist Kelas VII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Ikhwan Sesait, Kecamatan Kayangan Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 2098–2103. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2655
  25. Rambe, M. S., & Yarni, N. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sma Dian Andalas Padang. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v2i2.486
  26. Riny, M., & Safrul. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran STAD Menggunakan Powerpoint Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8666–8674. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3885
  27. Setiawan, A. S., & Alimah, S. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Visual Auditory Kinesthetic (Vak) Terhadap Keaktifan Siswa. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.7284
  28. Sudana, I. P. A., & Wesnawa, I. G. A. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i1.10128
  29. Supit, D., Melianti, M., Lasut, E. M. M., & Tumbel, N. J. (2023). Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, Kinestetik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6994–7003. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1487
  30. Upa, A. T., Sahabuddin, S., Mappaompo, M. A., Suwardi, S., & Hudain, M. A. (2025). Learning Outcomes in Dribbling the Ball Through the STAD Learning Model: Elementary School Students' Football Game Material. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 4(4), 1415-1425. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3604
  31. Yurisma, I. O., Lian, B., & Kurniawan, C. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1981
  32. Zahran, M. (2019). Q Uantum Learning : Spesifikasi , Prinsip , Dan Faktor. JRTIE: Journal of Research and Thought of Islamic Education, 2(2), 141–157.
  33. Zahro, F., Degeng, I. N. S., & Mudiono, A. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran student team achievement devision (STAD) dan mind mapping terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v8i2.3021

Copyright (c) 2026 Jela A. Rahawarin, Samuel P. Ritiauw, Leonid Ritiauw

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Elementary School Learning Style Learning Outcomes Social Studies STAD