Morphological Analysis of Shortened Forms on Instagram as a Source for Learning Indonesian

Sri Verlin 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam As’adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2025-09-27
Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025) PAGES 1729-1741
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.4062
Views / Downloads 230 2382

Social media platforms like Instagram encourage word shortening and other non-standard vocabulary developments. This phenomenon is typically overlooked in Indonesian language morphology instructional materials, which emphasize normative principles. Therefore, an in-depth morphological analysis of these shortening forms and an exploration of their potential as authentic learning resources are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and classify the dominant types of word shortening on Instagram, (2) analyze the morphological process of forming these shortening forms, and (3) formulate didactic implications for utilizing these findings as a source for learning Indonesian language morphology. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a content analysis method. Data in the form of text (captions, comments, and stories) containing shortened forms were collected from Indonesian-language Instagram accounts and analyzed based on morphological rules. The results show that abbreviations and contractions are the most dominant types of shortening on Instagram. The most active morphological processes are syllable fragmentation (apocope) and vowel deletion (syncope). The analysis shows that although many shortened forms are nonstandard, their formation patterns still follow principles of lexical efficiency that can be explained morphologically. This study makes a significant contribution by offering a contextualized morphology teaching model based on contemporary language practices. Utilizing Instagram data can increase student learning interest and bridge the gap between language theory in the classroom and the reality of everyday digital communication.

Verlin, S. (2025). Morphological Analysis of Shortened Forms on Instagram as a Source for Learning Indonesian. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 4(4), 1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.4062
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Amaro, R., & Reis, M. L. (2023). Abbreviations in social media communication. Lexicography, 10(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1558/lexi.263
  2. Aulia, H. R., Nurmalisa, D., Setyarum, A., Pramitasari, A., Dewi, D. P., Arifianti, I., ... & Dewanto, A. C. (2025). Integrating digital society trends into teaching materials: Enhancing Indonesian language learning for foreign speakers at Universitas Pekalongan. BIS Education, 1, V125019-V125019. https://unimma.press/conference/index.php/bised/article/view/167
  3. Azka, S. S., & Karo-Karo, S. T. H. (2023). Penggunaan bahasa gaul dikalangan remaja dalam menggunakan Twitter. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 2(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v2i1.1148
  4. Bangun, M. A., Nasution, M. F. A., Sinaga, N. R., Sastra, S. F. D., & Khairani, W. (2024). Analisis pengaruh media sosial terhadap perkembangan bahasa Indonesia di era globalisasi. Jurnal Bahasa Daerah Indonesia, 1(3), 9-9. https://doi.org/10.47134/jbdi.v1i3.2646
  5. Dilla, F. (2021). Use of Abbreviations in Social Media Accounts of Public Officials and Their Impact on Communication Effectiveness. In 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE-4 2021) (pp. 11-17). Atlantis Press.
  6. Domogen, J. C. (2023). Authenticity in language learning: a study of language materials in public high schools. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v17i2.8577
  7. e Rana, G., Ullah, S., & Shoaib, M. (2025). Instagram Stories as Literature: Narrative, Audience, and Form in Social Media Storytelling. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 3(4), 1-19. https://llrjournal.com/index.php/11/article/view/283
  8. Gabig, C. S., & Zaretsky, E. (2013). Promoting morphological awareness in children with language needs: Do the common core state standards pave the way?. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f592
  9. Grace, R. S. M. U., & Heryono, H. (2022). Abbreviations Used By Millennials on Instagram: A Morphosemantic Study. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 9(1), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.413
  10. Green, L., & Wolter, J. (2025). Morphological Awareness: Connecting Language Foundations and Academic Literacy Success for Students With Language and Literacy Deficits. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00119
  11. Halfian, W. O., Ramadani, S. R., & Masri, F. A. (2023). Abbreviation in Social Media Account Status on Instagram-@ Dasadlatif1212: A Morphological Approach. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 13(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v13i2.156-168
  12. Kaharuddin, A. (2020). Principles behind semantic relation between common abbreviations and their expansions on instagram.
  13. Kelly-Holmes, H. (2019). Multilingualism and technology: A review of developments in digital communication from monolingualism to idiolingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000102
  14. Khanetnok, P., Srihamongkhon, K., Daengsaewram, S., & Thabkhoontod, R. (2023). Morphology: Word Formation in Linguistics. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(1), 83-92.
  15. Makulilo, P. B. (2025). Morphological Productivity and Lexical Innovation in Swahili: Digital Communication and Language Transformation in Social Media Spaces. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 3(2), 231-249. https://journal.wiseedu.co.id/index.php/ltsmjournal/article/view/176
  16. Mamba, M. A. (2024). Authentic materials: fostering collaborative language learning. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i2.5419
  17. Mirsarraf, M., Shairi, H., & Ahmadpanah, A. (2017). Social semiotic aspects of Instagram social network. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Innovations in intelligent systems and applications (INISTA) (pp. 460-465). IEEE.
  18. Nani, N. (2024). The Influence of Language on Interaction and Communication Within Social Media Platforms. Focus Journal: Language Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62795/fjlg.v2i2.295
  19. Pantelidou, N., Leivada, E., & Morosi, P. (2025). Resource-sensitive but language-blind: Community size and not grammatical complexity better predicts the accuracy of Large Language Models in a novel Wug Test. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12463.
  20. Qian, X. (2025). Textual and visual narratives of travel experiences on Instagram in a social performance context. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(2), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480231179130
  21. Rohi, M. P., & Nurhayati, L. (2024). Multimodal learning strategies in secondary EFL education: Insights from teachers. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2).
  22. Schreiber, M. (2024). Text on Instagram as emerging genre: A framework for analyzing discursive communication on a visual platform. Studies in communication sciences, 24(1), 141-157. https://www.hope.uzh.ch/scoms/article/view/3882
  23. Sulistyawati, E., Nugroho, A., & Bram, B. (2021). Morphological teaching strategies to enhance students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 7(2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i2.2472
  24. Supriadi, I., & Sari, Y. (2024). Indonesian Cultural Identity In Social Media Networks: A Critical Discourse Analysis On Instagram Of Gen Z Users. MSJ: Majority Science Journal, 2(1), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i1.76
  25. Sutama, I. M., Yasa, I. N., Dewantara, I. P. M., & Saddhono, K. (2022). ICT utilization in Indonesian language learning at the junior high school level in Buleleng Regency, Bali, Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), 947-955.
  26. Verlin, S. (2018). Embodiment Of Arbitrary Abbreviations And Acronyms In Instagram Social Media. Journal of Islam and Science, 5(2), 42-45.
  27. Verlin, S. (2022). Abreviation Establishment in Instagram Social Media. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(4), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.753
  28. Wahyuni, S., Zaki, R. M., & Mulyaningsih, I. (2025). Abreviasi Respon Netizen Terhadap Postingan Akun Instagram@ sandyk_sk. Bahasa: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.26499/bahasa.v7i1.1175
  29. Yatri, I., Latifah, N., & Ninawati, M. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Multimodal Text-Based Whole-Language Learning Materials for Children. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5040-5052. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5908
  30. Zerkina, N., Kostina, N., & Pitina, S. A. E. (2015). Abbreviation semantics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.497

Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Verlin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Content Analysis Indonesian Language Learning Instagram Morphology Word Shortening