Effect of Differences in Learning Treatments on the Mathematical Representation Ability of Elementary School Students

1 Elementary School Teacher Education Program, Sumedang Regional Campus, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Link Copied!

Selecting an appropriate learning approach is important for developing students’ mathematical representation ability. This study aimed to examine and compare the effectiveness of three instructional treatments, namely the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach integrated with the DASAFA (Dadu Sarapan Favorit) media, the RME approach without additional media, and the use of DASAFA media without the RME approach, in improving the mathematical representation ability of third-grade elementary school students on data presentation material. This study employed a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent pretest-posttest comparison-group design. The research subjects consisted of 115 students from four public elementary schools in North Sumedang District, divided into three experimental groups. The instruments used included a test measuring mathematical representation ability with a reliability of 0.923, as well as a learning interest questionnaire using a four-point Likert scale. Data analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Walli’s test, N-Gain, and the coefficient of determination. The results showed significant differences in improvement among the three groups. The RME approach integrated with DASAFA media produced the greatest improvement, contributing 48.3% to students’ mathematical representation ability. The RME group contributed 38%, while the DASAFA media group contributed 15.4%. However, the DASAFA group achieved the highest visual representation score and the highest learning interest score of 87.03%. The findings suggest that integrating RME with contextual concrete media can support more meaningful mathematics learning, although students’ symbolic and verbal representation abilities still require further development.

Septiani, V. S. N., Maulana, M., & Isrok'atun, I. (2026). Effect of Differences in Learning Treatments on the Mathematical Representation Ability of Elementary School Students. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 1009–1034. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i3.5313

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Anjly, M. (2026). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Student Center Learning (SCL) Berbantuan Video Youtube terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik. In UIN RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG (Vol. 13, Issue 1). https://www.preventionweb.net/news/preliminary-report-february-6-2023-earthquakes-turkiye
  2. Anjly, M., Anggoro, B. S., & Dewi, N. R. (2025). Pengaruh Student Center Learning Berbantuan Video Youtube terhadap Berpikir Kritis Dan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 156–165. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/37137/21210
  3. Apriyanti, E., Asrin, A., & Fauzi, A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1978–1986. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5940
  4. Atikasuri, & Al-Kusaeri. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berbasis Etnomatematika Kain Tenun Lombok. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 353–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1486
  5. Dwirahayu, G., Sandri, M., & KusniawatiDedek. (2020). Inquiry Based RME terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematik Siswa. FIBONACCI : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 6, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.6.1.45-58
  6. Husaini, M., Pasandaran, R. F., Karmila, & Sukmawati. (2024). Deskripsi Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP/MTS ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v9i1.3811
  7. Kusumaningrum, R. S., & Nuriadin, I. (2022). Pengaruh Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Berbantu Media Konkret terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6613–6619. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3322
  8. Laia, W., Telaumbanua, Y. N., Mendrofa, N. K., & Mendrofa, R. N. (2025). Pengaruh Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i1.2237
  9. Misykah, Z., & Panggabean, D. S. (2022). Pengaruh Media Konkret terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika Kelas II SD Nurul Fathimiyah Bandar Klippa Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022. Jurnal Guru Kita, 6(4), 419–429.
  10. Natonis, S. F. M., Daniel, F., & Gella, N. J. M. (2022). Analisis Representasi Matematis Siswa ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3025–3033. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2592
  11. Nur Aliffia, I., Setyowidodo, I., & Tanthowi, Y. (2025). Efektivitas Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) Berbasis Media Konkret untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas V. PANDU : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 3(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v3i2.1717
  12. Nurul Laily, D., Untari, M. F., & Purnamasari, I. (2023). Analisis Minat Belajar Materi Pecahan dengan Media Konkret di Kelas II SDN Karanganyar Gunung 02. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(04), 1929–1934. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i04.1777
  13. Pohan, D., Saragih, S., & Khairani, N. (2023). Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Eliciting Activities (MEA) dengan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 3350–3363. . https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2752
  14. Ramadani, U. P., Muthmainnah, R., Ulhilma, N., Wazabirah, A., Hidayatullah, R., & Harmonedi, H. (2025). Strategi Penentuan Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian Pendidikan: Antara Validitas dan Representativitas. Jurnal QOSIM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 3(2), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i2.1021
  15. Ramadhani, A., Wulandari, N., & Kusumastuti, F. A. (2025). Penerapan Pendekatan Realistik Matematika Edukasi (RME) terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 8(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107227
  16. Ridha, F., Suharti, S., Halimah, A., & Nur, F. (2021). Efektivitas Penerapan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i2.8378
  17. Rizqiyati, I., Wardani, A., & Fadholi, Z. R. (2023). Penelitian Teori Perkembangan Piaget Tahap Operasional Konkret pada Usia 11-12 Tahun terhadap Hukum Kekekalan Volume. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 6(2), 634–638. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/
  18. Sari, M. C. P., Mahmudi, M., Kristinawati, K., & Mampouw, H. L. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis melalui Model Problem Based Learning. PTK: Classroom Action Research Journal, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v4i1.242
  19. Septiati, D. D., Makmuri, & Wiraningsih, E. D. (2022). Literatur Review: Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dengan menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Matematika. J-PiMat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v4i2.2023
  20. Sugiyono. (2016). Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods. In Alfabeta.
  21. Ulfa, N., & Liesdiani, M. (2025). Efektifitas Pendeketan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) dalam Meningkatkan Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 930–937. hhttps://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v9i2.4043
  22. Yuda, E. K., & Rosmilawati, I. (2024). Literasi Numerasi di Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Indikator PISA 2023; Systematic Literatur Review. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 4(3), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.53621/jider.v4i3.326

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Dimensions Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Original Research Articles