Focus-Explore-Reflect-Apply (FERA) Learning Model: Aqidah Akhlaq Learning Outcomes at Islamic Lower Secondary School

1 Department of Islamic Religious Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Link Copied!

Learning outcomes in Aqidah Akhlaq (Islamic creed and ethics) across Indonesian madrasahs are often constrained by traditional lecture-dominated instruction, leaving students struggling to master application-level cognitive skills (Cognitive Level C3). This study evaluated the efficacy of the Focus-Explore-Reflect-Apply (FERA) learning model—a constructivist framework adapted from science education—in enhancing student learning outcomes in Aqidah Akhlaq. A quantitative quasi-experimental design was conducted at an Islamic Lower Secondary School in East Lampung. Two intact seventh-grade classes with homogeneous baseline academic abilities were assigned to an experimental group taught via FERA (n=24) and a control group taught via conventional instruction (n=25). Data were collected using a validated 15-item objective test (Cronbach’s α=.650). Due to a non-normal score distribution in the experimental group (Shapiro-Wilk, p=.011), hypothesis testing was performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-6.169, p<.001), demonstrating that the FERA model yields significantly superior learning outcomes, particularly at the application level (C3). These findings suggest that adapting constructivist science-based models like FERA into Islamic education offers a promising pedagogical strategy to bridge cognitive application gaps in madrasah curricula.

Jannah, S. W., Makbuloh, D., & Saputra, M. I. (2026). Focus-Explore-Reflect-Apply (FERA) Learning Model: Aqidah Akhlaq Learning Outcomes at Islamic Lower Secondary School . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(4), 2624–2634. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.5567
  1. Adhikari, Y. (2024). A Review of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Education Review Journal, 1, 115-126. https://nepjol.info/index.php/erj/article/view/82852
  2. Akbar, M. D., Arbeni, W., Balqis, U., Hetiara, R., & Ramadhan, T. I. (2026). Taxonomy of educational objectives. EDUCTUM: Journal Research, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.56495/ejr.v5i1.1433
  3. AlAfnan, M. A. (2025). Enhancing educational outcomes using AlAfnan taxonomy: integrating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3), 2419-2437. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.33147
  4. Anggraini, F. D. P., Aprianti, A., Setyawati, V. A. V., & Hartanto, A. A. (2022). Pembelajaran statistika menggunakan software SPSS untuk uji validitas dan reliabilitas. Jurnal basicedu, 6(4), 6491-6504. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3206
  5. Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. https://doi.org/ 10.9790/7388-05616670
  6. Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 315-342). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_15
  7. Budiman, D. M., Gumilar, S., & Rizal, R. (2018). Focus, Explore, Reflect and Apply (FERA) Learning Model: Developing Science Process Skills for Pre-Service Science Teachers. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.2920
  8. Budiman, D. M., Gumilar, S., & Rizal, R. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA SD Melalui Model Pembelajaran FERA. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i1.15769
  9. Darwazeh, A. N. (2018). A new revision of the [revised] Bloom’s taxonomy. Distance Learning, 14(3), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/DL-03-2018-0002
  10. Diani, R., Latifah, S., Jamaluddin, W., Pramesti, A., Susilowati, N. E., & Diansah, I. (2020). Improving students’ science process skills and critical thinking skills in physics learning through fera learning model with savir approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1467, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012045
  11. Gozum, I. E. A., & Mendoza, J. K. T. (2026). Analyzing the UST-IR signature pedagogy (DoT-ED framework) vis-à-vis the constructivist and thomistic philosophies of education. International Studies in Catholic Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19422539.2026.2618117
  12. Katel, K. P. (2023). Teachers’ motivational factors and student learning achievements. Solukhumbu Multiple Campus Research Journal, 5(1), 1-14. https://nepjol.info/index.php/smcrj/article/view/64887
  13. Komarudin, K., Rahmawati, N. D., Anggoro, B. S., Suherman, S., & Arfina, S. (2022). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognitif dan Penalaran Adaptif Matematis: Dampak Model FERA Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 1419-1432. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1268
  14. Layali, H. N., & Sohiah, S. (2020). Teori hasil belajar pada siswa SDIT Cendikia. As-Sabiqun, 2(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v2i1.605
  15. Mawaddah, N. (2023). The Role of the Teacher as a Facilitator in the Islamic Religious Education Learning Process. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 2(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i2.998
  16. Norlianti, N., Aliyah, S. R., & Zainuri, H. (2024). Principles of Islamic religious education curriculum development. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies, 2(3), 206-214.
  17. Noushad, P. P. (2024). Taxonomies of educational objectives. In Designing and Implementing the Outcome-Based Education Framework: Theory and Practice (pp. 43-82). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0440-1_2
  18. Nurhalimah, S., & Rizal, R. (2024). Implementation Of Focus Explore Reflect Apply (FERA) Learning Model Assisted Crocodile Physics In Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 9(2), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i2.4771
  19. Oktama, P. A., Ruswanto, R., & Isti’ana, A. (2026). Transforming Islamic and Character Education: Enhancing Active Participation via Independent Curriculum in the Digital Era. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(3), 1725-1738. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i3.4994
  20. Ranialini, N., Azizah, N., & Anwar, S. (2024). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran FERA dan ICI terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Intizar, 30(2), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v30i2.25547
  21. Ranialini, N., Putra, E. D. D., Amelia, E., Istiqomah, I., Sadiyah, H., & Azizah, N. (2025). Learning Outcomes: How is the FERA Learning Model Experimentation in Islamic Religious Education Learning?. Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), 7(3), 1386-1402. https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v7i3.413
  22. RimahDani, D. E., Shaleh, S., & Nurlaeli, N. (2023). Variasi metode dan media pembelajaran dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 372-379. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i1.1829
  23. Rizal, R. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran FERA (Focus, Explore, Reflect, and Apply) dengan Pendekatan Scientific terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v9i2.349
  24. Sajidan, S., Adi, F. P., Ardiansyah, R., Atmojo, I. R. W., Saputri, D. Y., & Mahendrati, G. (2022). An Analysis of Psychomotor Assessment Levels Based on Anderson and Krathwohl's Taxonomy in Integrated Thematic Books. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 2945-2962. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2168
  25. Zul, Z., Najihul Huda, M., Fuad, Z., & Abdullah, M. (2026). Integration of Islamic ethics in modern education curriculum: challenges and opportunities-a systematic literature review. British Journal of Religious Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2026.2621177

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles