English Language Learning Achievement in Public Middle-School 1 Kertanegara: The Effects of "Jigsaw" Method

Yulfah Masruroh 1 Indonesia , Iskandar Iskandar 2 Indonesia , Elly Fatmasari 3 Indonesia
1 SMP Negeri 1 Kertanegara, Purbalingga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
2 Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
3 SMK Negeri 10 Makassar, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2022-09-27
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022) PAGES 571-580
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.371
Views / Downloads 297 802

The purpose of this action research is to learn about the improvement of English learning achievement for descriptive text using the Jigsaw method in the seventh grade at Public Middle-School 1 Kertanegara. This type of research uses classroom action research. The researcher's subjects are 32 students from Class F of Public Middle-School 1 Kertanegara. The study design consists of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data collection methods used are observation, test, non-test, and interview. The result of the study conducted by researchers proved that the Jigsaw method was able to improve learning achievement for descriptive texts. During the observation, there was a significant increase in mastery learning at 75% in the first cycle and 84% in the second cycle. At the beginning of the action, there were 17 students who completed it; in the first cycle, that number increased to 24 students, and in the second cycle, it increased to 27 students. Based on the comparison of the number of students’ learning achievements, there is an increase in learning achievement through the Jigsaw method. From this description, it can be concluded that students’ learning achievement for descriptive text can be improved through the Jigsaw method.

Masruroh, Y., Iskandar, I., & Fatmasari, E. (2022). English Language Learning Achievement in Public Middle-School 1 Kertanegara: The Effects of "Jigsaw" Method. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(4), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.371
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Arifin, K. (2022). Cooperative Learning on The Academic Achievement of Public Middle-School Students Based on Learning Style. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.175
  2. Aronson, E., & Thibodeau, R. (2006). The jigsaw classroom: A cooperative strategy for reducing prejudice. In Cultural diversity and the schools (pp. 231-255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973776-21
  3. Aswir, A., Hadi, M. S., & Dewi, F. R. (2021). Google meet application as an online learning media for descriptive text material. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.3.2020.533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.3.2020.533
  4. Clark, K. R. (2018). Learning theories: cognitivism. Radiologic Technology, 90(2), 176-179. http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/90/2/176.extract
  5. Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Action research in education: A practical guide. Guilford Publications.
  6. Fekri, N. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Cooperative Learning and Competitive Learning Strategies on the English Vocabulary Development of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 6-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p6
  7. Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual research journal, 27(3), 451-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162603
  8. Harmenita, R. Y., & Tiarina, Y. (2013). Teaching writing a descriptive text by using environmental observation strategy. Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 29-38.
  9. Hasbi, M., Munawir, A., Satriani., Ahmad, G., & Khair, U. (2022). Teaching Vocabulary Using Games: Empowering Students' Interest in ELT Classrooms. PATIKALA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(3), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.51574/patikala.v1i3.290
  10. Husna, L. (2017). An analysis of students’ writing skill in descriptive text at grade X1 IPA 1 of MAN 2 Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 1(1), 16-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v1i1.281
  11. Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. Sage.
  12. Kaharuddin, A. (2018). The communicative grammar translation method: a practical method to teach communication skills of English. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 4(2), 232-254. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A8
  13. Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Belanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
  14. Mendale, B. P., Komariah, E., & Fitriani, S. S. (2019). Analyzing Students’ Ability in Using the Language Features in Writing Descriptive text. Research in English and Education Journal, 4(4), 183-189.
  15. Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010). Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative Learning Technique: Focusing on the Language Learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(4).
  16. Muamaroh, M., Mukti, V. C., & Haryanti, D. (2020). The process and problems of EFL learners in English writing. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 7(2), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.215
  17. Muthoharoh, N. R., & Anita, A. (2018). Using Feedback in Teaching Writing Descriptive Text. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 11(2), 42-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v11i02.1035
  18. Namaziandost, E., Homayouni, M., & Rahmani, P. (2020). The impact of cooperative learning approach on the development of EFL learners’ speaking fluency. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1780811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1780811
  19. Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Exploring children's learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 415-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.008
  20. Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 358-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089-26
  21. Siregar, S. R., & Dongoran, N. (2020). Students’ Ability in Writing Descriptive Text. English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 8(01), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/ee.v7i01.1655
  22. Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2011). Evidence‐based interventions for reading and language difficulties: Creating a virtuous circle. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x
  23. Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2006). Embracing history through transforming it: Contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory & psychology, 16(1), 81-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306060108
  24. Widiastuti, N. L. G. K., & Purnawijaya, I. P. E. (2021). Improving Science Learning achievement Through the SETS (Science Environment Technology And Society) Approach. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(2), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.38388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.38388
  25. Zainuddin, S. Z. B., Pillai, S., Dumanig, F. P., & Phillip, A. (2019). English language and graduate employability. Education+ Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2017-0089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2017-0089
  26. Zulaikah, Z., Agustina, E., & Muklas, M. (2018). An Analysis Student’s Ability in Writing Descriptive Text of Second Semester of English Educational Program at STKIP Nurul Huda Oku Timur. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 10(1), 12-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v10i1.264

Copyright (c) 2022 ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Descriptive text Jigsaw method Learning achievement