Peran Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda dalam Analisis Butir Tes
Kajian Literatur untuk Pendidikan Menengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/jrep.v1i4.2250Keywords:
Teori Tes Klasik, Teori Respons Butir, Analisis Butir, Pendidikan DasarAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran teori tes klasik (CTT) dan teori respons butir (IRT) dalam evaluasi butir soal di pendidikan dasar. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dengan pendekatan kualitatif, yang mencakup perbandingan karakteristik analisis butir soal antara kedua teori ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa IRT memiliki keunggulan dalam menganalisis kemampuan individual siswa dengan lebih akurat, seperti melalui daya pembeda dan tingkat kesulitan butir soal. Sementara itu, CTT lebih mudah diterapkan namun terbatas pada skor total dan kurang mampu memberikan analisis mendalam tentang karakteristik butir soal. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penerapan IRT dalam pendidikan dasar dapat meningkatkan akurasi penilaian dan mendukung pembelajaran yang dipersonalisasi.
References
Adler, Mats, Jerker Hetta, Göran Isacsson, and Ulf Brodin. 2012. “An Item Response Theory Evaluation of Three Depression Assessment Instruments in a Clinical Sample.” BMC Medical Research Methodology. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-84.
Cappelleri, Joseph C., J. Jason Lundy, and Ron D. Hays. 2014. “Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures.” Clinical Therapeutics. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006.
Carlton, Jill, Donna Rowen, and Jackie Elliott. 2020. “Assessment of the Psychometric Properties and Refinement of the Health and Self-Management in Diabetes Questionnaire (HASMID).” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01305-3.
Cella, David, William T. Riley, Arthur A. Stone, Nan Rothrock, Bryce B. Reeve, Susan Yount, Dagmar Amtmann, Rita Bode, Daniel J. Buysse, Seung W. Choi, Karon F. Cook, Robert F. DeVellis, Darren A. DeWalt, James F. Fries, Richard Gershon, Elizabeth A. Hahn, Jin Shei Lai, Paul A. Pilkonis, Dennis A. Revicki, Matthias Rose, Kevin P. Weinfurt, and Ron D. Hays. 2010. “The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Developed and Tested Its First Wave of Adult Self-Reported Health Outcome Item Banks: 2005–2008.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.
Chen, Hao, and Yiduo Ye. 2021. “Validation of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale for Mainland Chinese Children and Adolescents.” Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594949.
Hamann, Antonieta. 2023. “Validation of a Scale for the Evaluation of the Dimensions of Short Break Tourist Destination.” Journal of Business. doi: 10.21678/jb.2023.1887.
Hambleton, R. K., and H. Swaminathan. 2013. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. books.google.com.
Hays, Ron D., Leo S. Morales, and Steve P. Reise. 2000. “Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century.” Medical Care. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007.
Hilmiyati, F. 2024. “Integration of Cognitive Technology in Learning Assessment and Evaluation.” Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World.
Jafari, Peyman, Zahra Bagheri, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi, and Zahra Soltani. 2012. “Using Rasch Rating Scale Model to Reassess the Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the PedsQLTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales in School Children.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-27.
Lamprianou, I., and J. A. Athanasou. 2009. A Teacher’s Guide to Educational Assessment: Revised Edition. books.google.com.
Maciel Mattos, Grazielle Christine, Juliana Vaz de Mambrini, Jennifer E. Gallagher, Saul Martins Paiva, and Mauro Henrique Nogueira Abreu. 2017. “Evaluating Psychometric Properties of an Instrument Addressing Comprehensiveness of Care Among Dentists.” Brazilian Dental Journal. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201701334.
Michael, Thomas. 2010. “The Value of Item Response Theory in Clinical Assessment: A Review.” Assessment. doi: 10.1177/1073191110374797.
Petrillo, Jennifer, Stefan Cano, Lori McLeod, and Cheryl D. Coon. 2015. “Using Classical Test Theory, Item Response Theory, and Rasch Measurement Theory to Evaluate Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Comparison of Worked Examples.” Value in Health. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005.
Samuel, Douglas B., Leonard J. Simms, Lee Anna Clark, W. John Livesley, and Thomas A. Widiger. 2010. “An Item Response Theory Integration of Normal and Abnormal Personality Scales.” Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
Schmidt, Christopher D., and Nathan C. Gelhert. 2016. “Couples Therapy and Empathy.” The Family Journal. doi: 10.1177/1066480716678621.
Silva, Rajitha, Yuping Guan, and Tim B. Swartz. 2017. “Bayesian Diagnostics for Test Design and Analysis.” Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science. doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2017.100202.
Sukardi, H. M. 2008. “Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip Dan Operasionalnya.” Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Twiss, James, David Meads, E. Preston, S. R. Crawford, and Stephen P. McKenna. 2012. “Can We Rely on the Dermatology Life Quality Index as a Measure of the Impact of Psoriasis or Atopic Dermatitis?” Journal of Investigative Dermatology. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.238.
Zhang, Chao. 2023. “Validation of a Chinese Version of the Digital Stress Scale and Development of a Short Form Based on Item Response Theory Among Chinese College Students.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management. doi: 10.2147/prbm.s413162.
