Application of a Deep Learning Approach to Mathematics Learning Outcomes in the Probability Unit for Ninth-Grade Students

Fitria Andyasti Rahayu Pranata 1 Indonesia , Nani Ratnaningsih 1 Indonesia , Satya Santika 1 Indonesia
1 Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Siliwangi
Link Copied!
Published 2026-08-14
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026) PAGES 1167 - 1181
DOI 10.51574/kognitif.v6i3.5283
Views / Downloads 47 27

This study aimed to determine whether the mathematics learning outcomes of ninth-grade students on probability material after the implementation of a deep learning approach had achieved the Minimum Mastery Criterion (MMC). The study was motivated by the importance of developing students’ conceptual understanding, critical thinking skills, and active participation in mathematics learning through meaningful and student-centered instruction. The deep learning approach was expected to help students develop higher-oerder thinking skills, particularly in applying, analyzing, and evaluating probability concepts. This research employed a pre-experimental method using a One-Shot Case Study design. The population of the study consisted of all ninth-grade students at SMP Negeri 8 Tasikmalaya. The sample was selected using the cluster random sampling technique, in which one class was randomly chosen as the research sample. The instrument used in this study was a mathematics learning outcomes test on probability material developed based on cognitive indicators, namely C3 (applying), C4 (analyzing), and C5 (evaluating). The test was designed to measure students’ understanding and problem-solving abilities related to probability topics. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics techniques. Descriptive statistics were used to describe students’ mathematics learning outcomes, while inferential statistics were applied to test the research hypothesis. The hypothesis testing technique used in this study was the One-Sample t-Test to determine whether the average score of students’ learning outcomes had achieved the established MMC score of 80. The results showed that the average mathematics learning outcome score of the students was 73, which was below the established Minimum Mastery Criterion. Therefore, it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of ninth-grade students on probability material after the implementation of the deep learning approach had not yet achieved the Minimum Mastery Criterion.

Pranata, F. A. R., Ratnaningsih, N., & Santika, S. (2026). Application of a Deep Learning Approach to Mathematics Learning Outcomes in the Probability Unit for Ninth-Grade Students. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 1167–1181. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i3.5283
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  2. Anggraena, Y., Ginanto, D. E., Kesuma, A. T., & Setiyowati, D. (2025). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah (Edisi Revisi 2025). Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, Kemendikbudristek.
  3. Bambang, M., Pajria, P., Amelia, R., & Apriliah, G. (2025). Pendekatan deep learning dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan motivasi belajar siswa pada materi komposisi fungsi. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 1519–1532. https://e-journal.my.id/pedagogy/article/view/7116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7116
  4. Bayu, B. R., Arvy, B. R., & Nasrullah, A. (2026). Enhancing high school students' critical thinking through HOTS-based interactive e-modules. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4492
  5. Begolli, K. N., Dhillon, S., Devlin, B., Bagdasarov, A., & Richland, L. E. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49, 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
  7. Dewi, L. G. A. K., Hartawan, I. G. N. Y., & Astawa, I. W. P. (2019). Penerapan model eliciting activities (MEAs) berbantuan masalah open ended untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 8(2), 133–142. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPM/article/view/19986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppm.v8i2.2851
  8. Durasa, H., Mertasari, N. M. S., & Pujawan, I. G. N. (2024). Implementasi problem-based learning berdasarkan independensi belajar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan mengontrol kecemasan matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.7102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.7102
  9. Finariya, R., Susilaningtyas, T., & Mahmudah, M. (2023). Analisis kesulitan belajar matematika siswa kelas IX MTsS Nurul Islam Wuluhan pokok bahasan peluang di masa new normal tahun ajaran 2022/2023. INDOPEDIA (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan), 1(4), 1476–1486. https://indopediajurnal.my.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/216
  10. Fitriana, T., Huda, N., & Syafmen, W. (2026). Effect of conceptual, understanding, procedural, and problem-based learning models using a contextual approach on students' conceptual understanding skills. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4433
  11. García, T., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., González-Pienda, J. A., & Torrance, M. (2016). How affective-motivational variables and approaches to learning predict mathematics achievement in upper elementary levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.021
  12. Hammadi, S. S., Hamid, A. A., Jasim, R. K., & Kadhim, Q. K. (2023). Impact of deep learning strategy in mathematics achievement and practical intelligence among high school students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(6), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i06.38615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i06.38615
  13. Isyana, B. V., Baidowi, Novitasari, D., & Sridana, N. (2024). Pengaruh self confidence terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII SMP. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 6(1), 370–383. https://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/MANDALIKA/article/view/7125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v6i1.7125
  14. Juika, Dewi, S. V., & Heryani, Y. (2026). Effectiveness of problem-based learning with the teaching at the right level approach on students' mathematical concepts understanding ability. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.3379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.3379
  15. Kazak, S., & Pratt, D. (2021). Developing the role of modelling in the teaching and learning of probability. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1802328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1802328
  16. Marjiyem. (2025). Menggali makna konsep aljabar melalui deep learning: Penerapan operasi bentuk aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.17977/um068.v5.i4.2025.3
  17. Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252
  18. Öçal, M. F. (2018). The case of time axis fallacy: 11th grade students' intuitively-based misconception in probability and teachers' corresponding practices. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s4m DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s4m
  19. Oktaviani, U., Kumawati, S., Apriliyani, M. N., Nugroho, H., & Susanti, E. (2020). Identifikasi faktor penyebab rendahnya hasil belajar matematika peserta didik di SMK Negeri 1 Tonjong. MATH LOCUS, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31002/mathlocus.v1i1.892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/mathlocus.v1i1.892
  20. Peng, M. Y.-P., & Chen, C. C. (2019). The effect of instructor's learning modes on deep approach to student learning and learning outcomes. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 19(3), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.3.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.3.005
  21. Pujawati, F., Rahayu, D. V., & Sritresna, T. (2025). Exploration of the implementation of deep learning approach in teaching mathematics in secondary schools. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v14i2.27374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v14i2.27374
  22. Rahmawati, S., Muzdalipah, I., & Muslim, S. R. (2026). Improving students' mathematical reasoning ability through the joyful learning model assisted by GeoGebra. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.1755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.1755
  23. Riana, & Fitrianna, A. Y. (2021). Analisis kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal peluang pada siswa SMP kelas IX ditinjau dari taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(4), 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.1019-1032
  24. Rinaldi, A., Novalia, & Syazali, M. (2020). Statistika inferensial untuk ilmu sosial dan pendidikan. IPB Press.
  25. Silalahi, S. A., Zainal, A., & Sagala, G. H. (2022). The importance of deep learning on constructivism approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Strategic Issues on Economics, Business and Education (ICoSIEBE 2021) (pp. 243–246). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220104.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220104.036
  26. Siregar, M. L., Winarni, S., & Marlina. (2024). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika model discovery learning pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 175–186. https://ejournal.tsb.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/1503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i1.1503
  27. Subiyantoro, S. (2025). Problem and project-based learning. Penerbit Lakeisha.
  28. Sugiharni, G. A. D., & Setiasih, N. W. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi blended learning matakuliah matematika diskrit di STIKOM Bali berbasis model Alkin. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v1i2.2626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v1i2.2626
  29. Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  30. Vebrian, R., Putra, Y. Y., Saraswati, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika kontekstual. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2602–2614. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4369
  31. Wahyudi, D. A. (2025). Pengaruh pembelajaran deep learning terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMA Dharma Pancasila Medan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan PEDAGOGI, 1(1), 9–17. https://sfa-alfatih-press.com/JIPP/article/view/26
  32. Wijayanto, N. (2025). Metode & strategi pembelajaran deep learning (pembelajaran mendalam). Mandita.

Copyright (c) 2026 This is an open-access under the CC-BY-SA license  

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@gmail.com, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com

Creative Commons License
Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif  berlisensi  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

p-ISSN 2776-9984, e-ISSN 2776-9704 

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Deep Learning Approach Higher-Order Thinking Mathematics Learning Outcomes Minimum Mastery Criterion Probability