Effectiveness of Implementing Demonstration Methods in the Learning Process of Fiqh Subjects

Kartini Kartini 1 Indonesia
1 Institut Agama Islam As'Adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2023-09-27
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023) PAGES 26-35
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v2i4.947
Views / Downloads 221 261

Study on the effectiveness of implementing demonstration methods in the learning process of jurisprudence subjects. The problems discussed include the effectiveness of implementing the demonstration method at Madrasah Aliyah DDI Pattojo, Soppeng Regency. The aim of the author in choosing this discussion is because the theoretical learning process is widespread without being accompanied by practical ones, while the aim of learning, especially in the subject of jurisprudence, is to understand and practice. To examine this problem, this research is descriptive-qualitative research. The data collection procedure is through library research, namely by quoting available books related to the author's thesis, which are then quoted directly and indirectly, and field research. The author's data collection technique is conducting observations, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires with deductive, inductive, and comparative data analysis techniques. From the research process, it was found that the effectiveness of implementing the demonstration method in the learning process for Islamic jurisprudence subjects at the Madrasah Aliyah DDI Pattojo, Soppeng Regency was quite effective at the age of students who had already entered the phase of wanting to learn in a different atmosphere, not only in the classroom, but were constrained by the madrasa facilities, which is inadequate. However, basically, the effectiveness of implementing the demonstration method in the learning process for Islamic jurisprudence subjects at Madrasah Aliyah DDI Pattojo, Soppeng Regency, is quite good, but it is not evenly distributed due to the various obstacles above.

Kartini, K. (2023). Effectiveness of Implementing Demonstration Methods in the Learning Process of Fiqh Subjects. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 2(4), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v2i4.947
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Agustini, K., Santyasa, I. W., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2019). Analysis of competence on “TPACK”: 21st century teacher professional development. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1387, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012035
  2. Akgun, B., Cakmak, M., Jiang, K., & Thomaz, A. L. (2012). Keyframe-based learning from demonstration: Method and evaluation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0160-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0160-0
  3. Bando, U. D. M. A., & Elihami, E. (2021). Pengaruh Metode Demonstrasi Terhadap Pembelajaran Fiqh Di Pesantren Melalui Konsep Pendidikan Nonformal. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 2(1), 81-90.
  4. Basuki, B. (2022). Analysis of the Systematic Subject Matter for Fiqh in Islamic Religious Education Lessons at Schools in the 2022 Prototype Curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3019-3028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2207
  5. Brys, T., Harutyunyan, A., Suay, H. B., Chernova, S., Taylor, M. E., & Nowé, A. (2015). Reinforcement learning from demonstration through shaping. In Twenty-fourth international joint conference on artificial intelligence.
  6. Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: new empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  8. Daluba, N. E. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students' Achievement in Agricultural Science. World journal of Education, 3(6), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n6p1
  9. Gómez, L. F., & Valdés, M. G. (2019). The Evaluation of Teacher Performance in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 7(2), 499-515.
  10. Habibi, F., & Zabardast, M. A. (2020). Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technology in Society, 63, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101370
  11. Hadi, N. (2019). Concept of educational values for Tauhid nation education system perspective. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 2(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v2i1.652
  12. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). Education, knowledge capital, and economic growth. The economics of education, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00014-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00014-8
  13. Helda, H., & Syahrani, S. (2022). National standards of education in contents standards and education process standards in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 2(3), 257-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32
  14. Hidayah, S. N. I., & Az-zafi, A. (2021). The Role Of The Religious Laboratory In Improving Students' Understanding Of Fiqh Lessons. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 157-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v2i2.53
  15. Iqbal, M. H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, M. A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100172
  16. Jorgenson, S. N., Stephens, J. C., & White, B. (2019). Environmental education in transition: A critical review of recent research on climate change and energy education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604478
  17. Latief, S., Sari, Y. A., Yusuf, M., Armila, A., & Hidayat, R. E. (2021). The Development of Islamic Education and Strengthening of National Education System of Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 4(2), 86-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v4i2.105
  18. Levi, T., & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020). Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy: Learning from the teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 168-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1692347
  19. Mahalik, M. K., Mallick, H., & Padhan, H. (2021). Do educational levels influence the environmental quality? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in selected BRICS countries with a new policy perspective. Renewable Energy, 164, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.090
  20. Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
  21. Nargiza, Y. (2022). Social and moral education of students and development of values. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 300-305.
  22. Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2021). Professional learning networks: From teacher learning to school improvement?. Journal of educational change, 22, 13-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09383-2
  23. Ratliff, N. D., Silver, D., & Bagnell, J. A. (2009). Learning to search: Functional gradient techniques for imitation learning. Autonomous Robots, 27, 25-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-009-9121-3
  24. Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and higher education, 12(1), 7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
  25. Santoso, G. (2021). The Philosophical Power of Civic Education 21st Century in Indonesia. IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 4(1), 72-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v4i1.1220
  26. Stanley, M. (2014). Qualitative descriptive: A very good place to start. In Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy (pp. 21-36). Routledge.
  27. Tohara, A. J. T. (2021). Exploring digital literacy strategies for students with special educational needs in the digital age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(9), 3345-3358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i9.5741
  28. Žalėnienė, I., & Pereira, P. (2021). Higher education for sustainability: A global perspective. Geography and Sustainability, 2(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001

Copyright (c) 2023 ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Effectiveness Demonstration Learning Process Fiqh