STEM Integration as a Catalyst for Learning Revolution in Madrasah Education: The Context of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0

Satriani Satriani 1 Indonesia , Besse Mutmainnah 1 Indonesia , Baso Syafaruddin 1 Indonesia , Syamsuddin Semmang 2 Indonesia
1 Universitas Islam As’adiyah Sengkang
2 Universitas Islam As'adiyah Sengkang
Link Copied!
Published 2026-06-29
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026) PAGES 2092-2105
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.4865
Views / Downloads 18 19

The rapid progression of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 demands a fundamental paradigm shift in educational practices within Islamic junior high schools (MTsS), which traditionally rely on passive, teacher-centered pedagogies. This study examines the urgency and empirical effectiveness of implementing the STEM approach as an instrument of learning revolution at MTsS As’adiyah Kajuara, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Employing a descriptive qualitative case study design, data were gathered via participant observation, semi-structured interviews with science and mathematics educators and students, and documentation analysis of STEM-based lesson plans, student project portfolios, and prototype products. Data credibility was established through triangulation and member-checking, while analysis followed Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model. The findings demonstrate that STEM integration generated a 25% average improvement in students’ critical thinking skills, specifically enhancing analysis (+22%), creative problem-solving (+30%), and collaboration (+23%). Students successfully engineered context-specific technological prototypes, including a gravity-fed automatic irrigation system and a computational zakat calculator synthesizing Islamic jurisprudence with algorithmic logic. Despite physical laboratory constraints, the strategic utilization of virtual laboratories (PhET simulations) and digital collaboration platforms (Google Classroom) served as primary enablers. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that STEM-based pedagogy constitutes an empirically validated catalyst for educational reform. Fusing Islamic values with technical frameworks establishes a distinctive "Humanistic STEM" model aligned with Society 5.0 imperatives, supporting broader curricular adoption across resource-constrained religious institutions.

Satriani, S., Mutmainnah, B., Syafaruddin, B., & Semmang, S. (2026). STEM Integration as a Catalyst for Learning Revolution in Madrasah Education: The Context of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 5(4), 2092–2105. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.4865
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adel, A. (2024). The convergence of intelligent tutoring, robotics, and IoT in smart education for the transition from industry 4.0 to 5.0. Smart Cities, 7(1), 325-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7010014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7010014
  2. Adiyono, A., Fitri, A. Z., & Al Matari, A. S. (2024). Uniting science and faith: A Re-STEAM interdisciplinary approach in Islamic education learning. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 4(3), 332-355. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=74099534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v4i3.281
  3. Akgunduz, D., & Mesutoglu, C. (2021). STEM education for Industry 4.0 in technical and vocational high schools: Investigation of teacher professional development. Science Education International, 32(2), 172-181. https://icaseonline.net/journal/index.php/sei/article/view/315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.11
  4. Aksan, S. M., Zein, M., & Saumur, A. S. (2023). Islamic educational thought on STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics): Perspectives and implementation. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 6(4), 378-386. https://ijtmer.saintispub.com/ijtmer/article/view/325
  5. Akturk, C., Talan, T., & Cerasi, C. C. (2022). Education 4.0 and University 4.0 from Society 5.0 Perspective. In 2022 12th International conference on advanced computer information technologies (ACIT) (pp. 577-582). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT54803.2022.9913099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT54803.2022.9913099
  6. Azhari, R. A., Hidayah, N., Diani, R., & Kalifah, D. R. N. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Problem-Based Learning Model with STEM Approach: Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4069
  7. Cahyanti, N. A., Suyanto, S., Wantara, N., Begimbetova, G. A., Uanayah, H., & Khilafah, M. R. N. (2024). A Systematic Review of STEM Education Implementation in Indonesian High Schools: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Recommendations. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1528-1443. https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmipa/article/view/127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1428-1443
  8. Cakmakci, G., Aydeniz, M., Brown, A., & Makokha, J. M. (2025). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship learning. Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 293-311). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_17
  9. Dubek, M., Rickey, N., & DeLuca, C. (2024). Balancing disciplinary and integrated learning: How exemplary STEM teachers negotiate tensions of practice. School Science and Mathematics, 124(4), 249-265. . https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12645
  10. Fitri, F., & Hasbi, M. (2025). Bio-Math Synergy: Creating Relevant Cross-Disciplinary Learning in the Digital Age. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 5(1), 838-847. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4701
  11. Gatete, O. (2026). Revisiting TPACK: A critical review and contextual extension for the digital age. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 54(3), 561-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395251382942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395251382942
  12. Hamman-Fisher, D., & McGhie, V. (2023). Towards decoloniality of the education training and development third-year curriculum: Employing situated learning characteristics to facilitate authentic learning. Cogent education, 10(2), 2237301. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2237301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2237301
  13. Herlita, F., Yamtinah, S., & Wati, I. K. (2023). The Effect of the PjBL-STEM Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Science Learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i2.57963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i2.57963
  14. Holroyd, C. (2022). Technological innovation and building a ‘super smart’society: Japan’s vision of society 5.0. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1749340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1749340
  15. Idris, R., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring STEM education trends in Malaysia: Building a talent pool for Industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 381-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16825
  16. Irawan, M. A., & Wekke, I. S. (2024). Madrasah on the Move: Integrating STEM for the Knowledge Advancement. Internasional Conference Islamic Education, Law and Civilization (ICIELC), Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darul Dakwah Wal Irsyad Maros, Turikale 27-28 January 2024. PubPub. https://dewanpendidikanmaros.pubpub.org/pub/e7tjnagv/release/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/f77823fb.6a5089ac
  17. Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
  18. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
  19. Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.656041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
  20. Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9
  21. Megawati, R., Subchan, W., Wahyuni, D., & Tanta, T. (2025). STEM as a Catalyst for Education 5.0 to Improve 21st Century Skills in College Students: A Literature Review. Open Education Studies, 7(1), 20250117. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2025-0117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2025-0117
  22. Nafukho, F., Mansour, W., & Van, H. (2024). The fourth and fifth industrial revolutions: HRD’s role in preparing graduates for future work. The fourth and fifth industrial revolutions: HRD’s role in preparing graduates for future work, 248-263. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5909121#page=295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529674088.n21
  23. Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
  24. Onu, P., Ikumapayi, O. M., Omole, E. O., Amoyedo, F. E., Ajewole, K. P., Jacob, A. S., ... & Mbohwa, C. (2024). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and the influence of Industry 4.0. In 2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable Development Goals (SEB4SDG) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEB4SDG60871.2024.10630198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SEB4SDG60871.2024.10630198
  25. Rachman, T. A., Latipah, E., Supiana, S., & Zaqiah, Q. Y. (2022). Education Development in Utilizing Indonesian Demographic Dividend: The Road to Become a Developed Country. 4th International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2021) (pp. 334-342). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220303.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220303.060
  26. Rahmadani, E., Syafri, B. R., Panggabean, E. M., & Harahap, T. H. (2026). Analysis of Piaget's and Vygotsky's Cognitive Theories and Their Implications for the Sequence of Mathematics Learning Materials. OMEGA: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 308-316. https://www.ejurnal.univamedan.ac.id/index.php/jkpm/article/view/1280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47662/jkpm.v5i2.1280
  27. Riady, S. (2025). Advancing STEM education in Indonesia: multistakeholder partnership collaboration to achieve SDG 4. Development in Practice, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2025.2539151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2025.2539151
  28. Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
  29. Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2019). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0549. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885
  30. Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., & Marques, R. P. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society—a literature review. Societies, 12(6), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149
  31. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., ... & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/82341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
  32. Torres-Rivera, A. D., Rendón Peña, A. A., Díaz-Torres, S. T., & Díaz-Torres, L. A. (2025). Ethical integration of AI and STEAM pedagogies in higher education: A sustainable learning model for society 5.0. Sustainability, 17(19), 8525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198525
  33. Turner, P. (2021). The fourth industrial revolution. In The Making of the Modern Manager: Mapping Management Competencies from the First to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 131-161). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81062-7_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81062-7_5
  34. Tóth, G. N., & Drégelyi-Kiss, Á. (2026). Bridging Skill Gaps through STEM: HR Risk Management in Higher Education for Industry 4.0 and 5.0. In 2026 IEEE 24th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) (pp. 000485-000490). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI68106.2026.11420348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI68106.2026.11420348
  35. Umar, A., Kadarisman, Y. P., & Rahman, M. R. (2025). Transformational Leadership and STEM Achievement in Indonesian Madrasahs: Insights from National Science Competitions. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2608044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2608044
  36. Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1
  37. Wijayati, A. Y., Widodo, W., & Istianah, F. (2025). The effectiveness of STEM-Based E-Modules in enhancing critical thinking skills of elementary school students. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 8(3), 679-694. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v8i3.1053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v8i3.1053
  38. Yamashita, T., Narine, D., Chidebe, R. C., Kramer, J. W., Karam, R., Cummins, P. A., & Smith, T. J. (2024). Digital skills, STEM occupation, and job automation risks among the older workers in the United States. The Gerontologist, 64(8), gnae069. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae069

Copyright (c) 2026 Satriani Satriani, Besse Mutmainnah, Baso Syafaruddin, Syamsuddin Semmang

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Critical Thinking Industry 4.0 Learning Revolution Society 5.0 STEM Education