Practicality and Effectiveness of the COMESC Learning Model in Fostering Statistical Thinking Skills

1 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
2 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Link Copied!

The COMESc learning model is a specialized instructional approach developed through research and development to address university students’ weaknesses in statistical thinking. These weaknesses include challenges in problem identification, hypothesis formulation, selection of appropriate statistical methods, interpretation of statistical relationships, application of significance testing, execution of calculations, comparison of sample and critical values, decision-making, and result interpretation. This study aimed to evaluate the practicality and effectiveness of the COMESc model in improving students’ statistical thinking skills. A limited field trial was conducted with 27 participants over 10 class sessions. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questionnaires and in-depth interviews, while quantitative data were obtained from closed-ended questionnaires and tests. Results indicated that the COMESc model is highly practical (95.65%) and effective, with 100% of participants achieving a minimum average test score of 73. The model also improved learning outcomes, enhanced performance, and stimulated active learning dynamics. Its strengths lie in ease of implementation, structured problem-solving syntax, and capacity to foster deeper statistical reasoning, while its main limitation is the need for instructor patience during initial implementation.

Nio, T. H., Suyitno, H., Kartono, K., & Mariani, S. (2025). Practicality and Effectiveness of the COMESC Learning Model in Fostering Statistical Thinking Skills. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i3.1184

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Achmadi, Geri. (2010). Mahir Matematika 3. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas
  2. Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi kedua). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Astuti, Y., & Setiawan, B. (2013). Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa (LKS) berbasis pendekatan inkuiri terbimbing dalam pembelajaran kooperatif pada materi kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v2i2.894
  4. As’ari, A.R. (2000). Mengapa perlu Penelitian Tindakan?. Makalah disampaikan dalam Pelatihan Action Research Tingkat Nasional bagi Para Instruktur Inti Propinsi: Jawa Barat, Sulawesi Selatan, Sumatra Utara, Maluku, Riau, dan Bengkulu di Wisma Handayani Cipete Jakarta. Jakarta: 20 Februari – 2 Maret.
  5. Davidson, Neil & Kroll, D.L. (1991). “An Overview of Research on Cooperative Learning Related to Mathematics”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 22(5):362-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.22.5.0362
  6. Firdaus, A. M. (2016). Efektivitas pembelajaran matematika melalui penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe snowball throwing. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(1), 61-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v9i1.1
  7. Firdaus, A. M., & Herwandi, H. (2023). STUDENTS’MATHEMATICS PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY WITH KINESTHETIC LEARNING STYLE AT VOCATIONAL SCHOOL. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 26(1), 153-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2023v26n1i11
  8. Hudojo, H. (1998). Pembelajaran Matematika Menurut Pandangan Konstruktivis. Makalah disajikan pada Seminar Nasional “Upaya-upaya Meningkatkan Peran Pendidikan Matematika dalam Era Globalisasi”. Program Pasca Sarjana IKIP Malang. Malang: 4 April.
  9. Gabbet, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2010). Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(6), 578-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.007
  10. Kemp, Jerold E, Morrison. (1994). Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Mc Millan Publishing Company
  11. Priatna, N. (2003). Kemampuan Penalaran dan Pemahaman Matematika Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama Negeri di Kota Bandung. Desertasi Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung.
  12. Soedjadi, (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdikud.
  13. Slavin, S.E. (1997). Educational Psychology: Theory Into Practices. Fifth Edition. Boston: Allyn Bacon Publishers.
  14. Thiagarajan, S, semmel D S, semmmel M I. (1974). Instructional Developments For Training Teachers Of Exceptional Children. Indiana: Indiana University Breemington.
Dimensions Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Original Research Articles