Using The Picture Comment Method in Senior High School Students: Descriptive Text Writing Skills

Deno Rahmatul  Ikhlas; Amra  Ariyani; Neni  Iryani

doi:10.51574/ijrer.v4i1.358

Using The Picture Comment Method in Senior High School Students: Descriptive Text Writing Skills

Deno Rahmatul Ikhlas ¹

, Amra Ariyani ²

, Neni Iryani ³

¹ Senior High School 2 Palembayan, Sumatera Barat

² State University of Makassar

³ Middle-School 36 Makassar

Link Copied!

Published 2024-12-27

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024) PAGES 11-27

DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v4i1.358

Views / Downloads 241 362

Abstract

The issue of English learning at public senior high school 2 Palembayan, where students' limited ability to write descriptive texts negatively impacted their overall learning outcomes, sparked this research. Therefore, this research aimed to improve students' ability to write descriptive texts using the picture comment method in senior high school. This research is a classroom action study that employs a qualitative approach. A total of 29 students from class X. IPS2 at public senior high school 2 Palembayan participated in this research. The instruments used to collect data were observation sheets, documentation, and tests. The study analyzed the obtained data using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The research findings from each implemented learning cycle demonstrated a significant increase in students' ability to write descriptive texts in English learning using the picture comment method. In cycle I, the learning outcomes of writing descriptive text obtained by students only reached 62% completion with an average score of 68, while in cycle II, it showed a fairly high increase with an average score of 80 and completion of 86%. Therefore, we can conclude that the picture comment method enhances students' descriptive text writing skills in class X.IPS2 of public senior high school 2 Palembayan.

How to Cite

Ikhlas, D. R. ., Ariyani, A. ., & Iryani, N. . (2024). Using The Picture Comment Method in Senior High School Students: Descriptive Text Writing Skills. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 4(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i1.358

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amon, L., & Bustami, M. R. (2021). Implementation of School-Based Management in Curriculum and Learning Processes: a Literatur Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah (Dikdasmen), 1-11.
Chen, M., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chao, G. C. N. (2021). Modeling learners’ self-concept in Chinese descriptive writing based on the affordances of a virtual reality-supported environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6013-6032.
Coenders, F., & Verhoef, N. (2019). Lesson Study: professional development (PD) for beginning and experienced teachers. Professional development in education, 45(2), 217-230.
Fujii, T. (2019). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of lesson study. Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics: An International Perspective, 681-704.
Hatch, L., & Clark, S. K. (2021). A study of the instructional decisions and lesson planning strategies of highly effective rural elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103505.
Karaer, G., Hand, B., & French, B. F. (2024). Examining the impact of science writing heuristic (SWH) approach on development of critical thinking, science and language skills of students with and without disabilities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101443.
Kohnke, L., Jarvis, A., & Ting, A. (2021). Digital multimodal composing as authentic assessment in discipline‐specific English courses: Insights from ESP learners. Tesol Journal, 12(3), e600.
Koroliova, V., Grechenko, V., Kovalchuk, M., Samoilenko, V., Shevchenko, T., & Zaitseva, V. (2021). Information and communication activity of students when writing a course work on linguistics. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 115-128.
Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2024). Development of argumentative writing ability in EFL middle school students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(1), 36-53.
Li, L., Farias Herrera, L., Liang, L., & Law, N. (2022). An outcome-oriented pattern-based model to support teaching as a design science. Instructional Science, 1-32.
Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C., Charney-Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., ... & Goldman, S. R. (2017). Text-based argumentation with multiple sources: A descriptive study of opportunity to learn in secondary English language arts, history, and science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 79-130.
Magnifico, A. M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer's audience. Educational psychologist, 45(3), 167-184.
Magyar, A., Habók, A., & Molnár, G. (2022). Exploring the role of English as foreign language receptive skills and learning strategy usage in the ability to acquire and apply knowledge at the beginning of higher education. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 808546.
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.
Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.
McBride, C., Pan, D. J., & Mohseni, F. (2022). Reading and writing words: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 125-138.
McTaggart, R., Nixon, R., & Kemmis, S. (2017). Critical participatory action research. The Palgrave international handbook of action research, 21-35.
Mulyasa, H. E. (2021). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 revisi: dalam era industri 4.0. Bumi Aksara.
Nystrand, M. (Ed.). (2023). What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. BRILL.
Purpura, J. E. (2024). Learning-oriented language assessment. The concise companion to language assessment, 1, 22-39.
Smith, H. (2020). The writing experiment: strategies for innovative creative writing. Routledge.
Wei, R., & Zhao, X. (2024). Effects of task-based language teaching on functional adequacy in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, 100838.
Yanti, F. A., Sukarelawan, M. I., Thohir, M. A., & Perdana, R. (2022). The Development of Scientific Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom of" Piil Pesenggiri" to Improve Process Skills and Character Values of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 499-506.
Zhai, C., & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100134.
Zhao, D. (2024). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: an analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32.
Zhussupova, R., & Shadiev, R. (2023). Digital storytelling to facilitate academic public speaking skills: case study in culturally diverse multilingual classroom. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(3), 499-526.