Analysis of Students' Numeracy Literacy Ability in Analyzing Graph and Table Information

1 Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah Metro University
Link Copied!

The ability to analyze information presented in graphs and tables is an important aspect of numeracy, as it is one of the indicators used to measure numeracy literacy internationally. This particular ability remains a challenge for students because it requires a high level of cognitive ability. However, it has not been extensively explored in depth. This study aimed to describe the difficulties encountered by tenth-grade senior high school students in analyzing information presented in the form of stacked bar charts and weekly expenditure tables. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Initial data were collected through a numeracy literacy test consisting of one context-based problem involving a system of linear equations in three variables (SPLTV), which had been validated by an expert in mathematics education and used as an instrument for selecting the research subjects. The subjects were selected using purposive sampling. The selected subjects were then explored in greater depth through semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that, when analyzing information presented in graphs and tables, the participants experienced varying degrees of mathematical misunderstanding, ranging from a failure to coordinate the two representations, which resulted in strategic errors, to a gap between their understanding and their ability to solve mathematical problems. This study provides an empirical description of specific areas in which students experience difficulties with data-representation-based numeracy. The implication is that greater emphasis should be placed on instructional design that explicitly trains students to establish conceptual connections when solving problems

Nurhamida, A., Linuhung, N., & Agustina, R. (2026). Analysis of Students’ Numeracy Literacy Ability in Analyzing Graph and Table Information . Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i3.5314

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abidin, Z., & Mauliza, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa melalui penerapan strategi scaffolding. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 5(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v5i1.2912
  2. Anggraini, K. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan numerasi siswa sma dalam menyelesaikan soal asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 837-849. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p837-849
  3. Anwar, M. K., Laasiliyah, M. L., Ayun, N., & Romdhoni, V. A. (2021, December). Kajian teoritis integrasi literasi numerasi dalam modul IPA SMP. In PISCES: Proceeding of Integrative Science Education Seminar (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 333-339). https://prosiding.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/pisces
  4. Fazzilah, E., Effendi, K. N. S., & Marlina, R. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konten uncertainty dan data. Jurnal Cendekia, 4(2), 1034-1043. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.306
  5. Gafelina., Hastuti, D., Fauziah, S., Nisa, V. Z., Nurakbar, T., Jabar, A., & Edde, G. P. (2026). Analisis Pelaksanaan ANBK Terhadap Literasi dan Numerasi Kesiapan Siswa dan Pemanfaatan TIK di SMP Satu Atap 1 Maliku Kalimantan Tengah. PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs, 9(1), 120-136.. https://ejournal-fia.unkris.ac.id/index.php/pandita/article/view/433/318
  6. Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view of a neglected field. Zdm, 52(3), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9
  7. Han, W., Susanto, D., Dewayani, S., Pandora, P., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, M., & Akbari, Q. S. (2017). Materi Pendukung untuk Literasi Numerasi. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta. http://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/id/eprint/11628
  8. Harahap, D. G. S., Nasution, F., N. S., E. S., & Sormin, S. A. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2089-2098. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2400
  9. Hariyani, S., & Aldita, V. C. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 8(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v8i1.805
  10. Hasanah, U., Putrawangsa, S., Setiawati, F. A., & Purwanta, E. (2024). Statistical literacy in primary education: An analysis of Indonesian fifth-graders’ data interpretation and analysis skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1335-1356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1335-1356
  11. Jazilah, F. V. (2024). Analisis kemampuan literasi numerasi peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal statistika. Postulat (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 96-111.
  12. http://eprints.umg.ac.id/id/eprint/9396
  13. Khomariah, N., Zawawi, I., & Suryanti, S. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi numerasi peserta didik smp ditinjau dari pola pikir matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v13i3.13632
  14. Mutmainnah., Prayitno, S., Kertiyani, N. M. I., & Subarinah, S. (2024). The Effect Of Numeracy Literacy On Students'critical Thinking Skills. Mandalika Mathematics And Educations Journal, 6(2), 895-906. Https://Doi.Org/10.29303/Jm.V6i2.8156
  15. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): LearningDuring – and From – Disruption, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
  16. Ozmen, Z. M., Guven, B., & Kurak, Y. (2020). Determining the graphical literacy levels of the 8th grade students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 269–292. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1079986
  17. Pallauta, J. D., Arteaga, P., & Garzón-Guerrero, J. A. (2021). Secondary school students' construction and interpretation of statistical tables. Mathematics, 9(24), 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243197
  18. Pratiwi, U. M., Novaliyosi, N., & Pujiastuti, H. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Students' critical thinking skills are reviewed from the solution of numeracy literacy problems. Sigma: Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(2), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.26618/sigma.v16i2.15353
  19. Ridha, M. & Khairunnisa. (2025). Studi kasus kesulitan siswa dalam mengonstruksi model matematika pada materi SPLDV.Primatika. J. Pend. Matt, 14(2), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v15i1.5458
  20. Ritmayanti, I. R., Turmudi, T., & Dasari, D. (2025). Kemampuan Literasi Statistik Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21: Systematic Literature Review dan Bibliometric Analysis. Juring (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 8(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v8i2.37382
  21. Rohim, D. C. (2021). Konsep asesmen kompetensi minimum untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Varidika, 33(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993
  22. Rosdiana, D., Rosita, N. T., & Yuliawati, L. (2025). Analisis kemampuan literasi numerasi peserta didik kelas V SDN Darangdan Tingkat. Uninus Journal of Mathematics Education and Science (UJMES), 10(2), 092-104. https://ojs.uninus.ac.id/UJMES/article/view/3723
  23. Rufiana, I. S., Arifin, S., Randy, M. Y., & Amaliya, F. N. (2024). Analysis of student errors in solving numeracy literacy problems of graph representation model in elementary school. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 11(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v11i2.18720
  24. Sari, N. S., Farida, N., & Rahmawati, D. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Discovery Learning Untuk Melatih Literasi Matematika. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v1i1.377
  25. Sumarni, S., Adiastuty, N., Riyadi, M., Nisa, D. K., Restu, A. M., & Lestari, I. T. (2023). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP dalam mengerjakan soal PISA uncertainty and data content. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 725-738. https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/6426
  26. Wahyuni, I., & Himmah, A. F. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa SMA Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Statistika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Malikussaleh, 4(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.29103/jpmm.v4i1.14476
  27. Wardani, R. T., Nuraeni, E., & Diana, S. (2025). Rasch model analysis of essay questions to measure literacy and numeracy skills in plant and animal bioprocess topics based on AKM. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 11(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v11i1.85614
  28. Warman, A. (2023). Assesmen Kompetensi Minimum Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Peserta Didik Pada Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 1(1), 22-29. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jirs/article/view/20
  29. Yustitia, V., Kusmaharti, D., & Irawan, E. P. (2024). Kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa kelas III SD pada materi operasi hitung bilangan cacah. INVENTA: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.8.2.a9586
Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles