The Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Resolving Student Misconceptions: Evidence from Algebra Tasks

https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4409

Authors

Keywords:

Cognitive Flexibility , Misconceptions , Radical Forms , Algebra, Case Studies

Abstract

Algebra is one of the fundamental subjects in secondary school mathematics education, but various studies show that students still often experience misconceptions, particularly in root form operations, which tend to persist even after formal instruction. One ability that is considered to have the potential to help students respond to these misconceptions is cognitive flexibility, which is the ability to use, compare, and switch between strategies adaptively. This case study aims to identify the characteristics of students' misconceptions in algebraic root operations and describe the role of cognitive flexibility in terms of variety, shifting, and justification/reflection. The study uses a qualitative approach with a contrastive case study design. Data were collected through a written test containing 12 root questions and semi-structured interviews based on stimulated recall. The analysis was conducted by combining mathematical correctness and cognitive flexibility scores with within-case and cross-case qualitative analysis. The results show that cognitive flexibility plays a role in responding to misconceptions, but its role is conditional. The novelty of this study lies in the finding that cognitive flexibility only contributes to the revision of misconceptions when supported by a strong conceptual understanding. Without this foundation, flexibility tends to produce procedural variations without meaningful conceptual change. The implication is that mathematics teachers need to design root form learning that not only encourages the use of various strategies but also emphasizes strategy comparison and conceptual reflection to help students reconstruct their understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alfiah Nurfadhilah AM Hindi, Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Patompo

Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Patompo

Usman Mulbar, Department of Mathematics, Faculty Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Department of Mathematics, Faculty Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Makassar

References

Al-rababaha, Y., Yew, W. T., Meng, C. C., & Al-rababaha, Y. (2022). Algebra Misconceptions among Tenth Graders in the United Arab Emirates Algebra Misconceptions among Tenth Graders in the United Arab Emirates. Internatinal Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development, 1(1), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i1/12197

Baybayon, G. G., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2024). EQUATIONS : TOWARDS IMPROVED. Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p83-98

Coppersmith, J. G., & Star, J. R. (2022). A Complicated Relationship: Examining the Relationship Between Flexible Strategy USe and Accuracy. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 382–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7601

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Elhilal, A. (2025). Digital conceptual mapping for enhancing mathematical concept formation and creative mathematical problem-solving through cognitive flexibility skills: a mixed methods study. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2494945

Elma, Z., Diah, N., Lestari, S., Oktavianingtyas, E., & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2025). The identification of misconceptions in visual learners based on the certainty of response index ( CRI ) in solving numeracy problems in algebra. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 14(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v14i1.20441 The

Güveli, H., Baki, A., & Güveli, E. (2022). The Impact of the Cognitive Conflict Approach on the Elimination of the Misconception in Square Root Numbers. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviewa, 5(2), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.604

Hamid, A. (2024). Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Materi Ekponen ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1539

Heinze, A., Star, Æ. J. R., & Verschaffel, Æ. L. (2009). Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0214-4

Hickendorff, M., McMullen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). Mathematical Flexibility: Theoretical, Methodological, and Educational Considerations. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.10085

Hindi, A. N. A., & HR, I. S. (2022). Profil Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa dalam Memahami Konsep Pecahan dengan menggunakan Certainty of Response Index. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v2i1.440

HR, I. S., Purwanto, Sukoriyanto, & Parta, I. N. (2023). Cognitive Conflict Based on Thinking Errors in Constructing Mathematical Concept. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.4.631

Kristie, J., & Star, J. R. (2010). Understanding the development of flexibility in struggling algebra students. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard Library, 12(4), 282–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.482150 Link

Laia, H. O., Avip, B., Martadiputra, P., Candraningsih, Y., & Marjud, F. (2025). Moderating Effects of Educational Level and Mathematical Competence on the Effectiveness of Cognitive Conflict Strategy : A Meta-Analysis. 7, 268–281.

Liljedahl, P. (2011). The theory of conceptual change as a theory for changing conceptions. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 16(1–2), 5–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v16i1-2.148290

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). NewYork: Sage Publication Inc.

Moru, E. K., & Mathunya, M. (2022). A constructivist analysis of G rade 8 learners ’ errors and misconceptions in simplifying mathematical algebraic expressions. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.16784

Munaji, Rohaeti, T., Mutadi, Sumliyah, & Kodirun. (2025). A literature review of flexibility in interactive mathematics classrooms : the role of teachers and students. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(2), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21501

Newton, K. J., Lange, K., & Booth, J. L. (2019). Mathematical Flexibility: Aspects of a Continuum and the Role of Prior Knowledgeitle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1586629

Ozkan, A., & Mehmet, E. (2012). Misconceptions and Learning Difficulties in Radical Numbers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.142

Özkan, M. (2011). Misconceptions in radicals in high school mathematics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.060

Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the Implementation of Cognitive Conflict Strategy Assisted by e-Service Learning to Reduce Students ’ Mathematical Misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(11), 102–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.11802 Ni

Posner, G. j., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception : Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change *. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

Pratiwi, V., Herman, T., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Algebraic thinking obstacles of elementary school students : A Hermeneutics-phenomenology study Algebraic thinking obstacles of elementary school students : A Hermeneutics-phenomenology study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032115

Rahaju, Murniasih, T. R., Sumaji, & Muchtadi. (2024). Hambatan Didaktis Berpikir Kritis dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i2.1672

Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Nasrun, N. (2020). Cognitive flexibility: exploring students’ problem-solving in elementary school mathematics learning. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11630

Ridho, M. H., & Juandi, D. (2023). Systematics Literature Review: Identification of Misconceptions in Mathematics Learning. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 9(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v9i1.19918

Rüede, C., Mok, S. Y., & Staub, F. C. (2023). Fostering Flexibility Using Comparing Solution Strategies and Classroom Discussion: Effects of Two Professional Development Programs. National Council of TEachers of Mathematics, 54(1), 43--63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0232

Santosa, Y. T., Antara, S., Irmanopaliza, A., Ferdianto, J., & Maftuhah, Y. (2025). Intervensi terbatas untuk mengatasi miskonsepsi korelasional pada materi peluang siswa kelas xii sma. 11(1), 147–162.

Secolsky, C., & Denison, B. (2018). HANDBOOK ON MEASUREMENT , ASSESSMENT , AND EVALUATION (Second Edi). Taylor & Francis.

Şenay, Ş. C. (2024). Analysis of Misconceptions and Errors Regarding Exponential and Radical Expressions Through the Theory of Reducing Abstraction. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 8(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1520588

Setyaningtyas, A. D., & Muksar, M. (2018). Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP Kelas IX pada Materi Bentuk Akar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 731–738. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11127

Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.018

Star, J. R., Tuomela, D., Prieto, N. J., Hästö, P., Palkki, R., Abánades, M. Á., Pejlare, J., Jiang, R. H., Li, L., & Liu, R. De. (2020). Exploring students ’ procedural flexibility in three countries. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00322-y

Vijaganita, L., & Alifiani. (2024). Students ’ Misconceptions in Simplifying Algebraic Expressions Based on Assimilation and Accommodation Frameworks. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendiidkan Matematika, 9(2), 191–206.

Winarso, W., & Udin, T. (2023). Addressing the Challenge of Mathematical Misconceptions : Development of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict Strategy. 7(3), 513–522.

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Hindi, A. N. A., & Mulbar, U. (2026). The Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Resolving Student Misconceptions: Evidence from Algebra Tasks. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v6i1.4409