Using Digital Pythagorean Tangram to Enhance Mathematical Justification Skills of Prospective Mathematics Teachers

1 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Link Copied!

Mathematical justification is a crucial skill for mathematics teachers because it emphasizes proof and reasoning. This study examines how using the media “Digital Pythagorean Tangrams,” a manipulable, multimedia tool on Polypad, can improve prospective teachers' justification skills when proving the Pythagorean theorem. This research used a one-group pretest-posttest design where students were given a pre-test, then received an intervention using the media, and subsequently completed a post-test. The participants included 44 mathematics education students at a university in Bandung. Instruments comprised a mathematical justification test (pretest and posttest) and Digital Pythagorean Tangram media. Pretest and posttest data were analysed to obtain the N-gain score to estimate the effect size. The N-gain data were analysed using a one-sample t-test to check whether the improvement was statistically significant.  The results revealed an average N-gain score of 0.42, which falls into the medium category, demonstrating a notable improvement in students' mathematical justification skills before and after using the digital tangram media. The One-Sample t-test also indicated a significance level below 0.05, confirming that the increase in students' mathematical justification ability is significant. Integrating digital manipulatives into proof-oriented instruction can meaningfully enhance prospective teachers’ justification skills and may serve as a practical pedagogical approach in mathematics teacher education.

Adhitya, Y., Putri, N. S., & Bustaren, B. C. R. (2025). Using Digital Pythagorean Tangram to Enhance Mathematical Justification Skills of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(4), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i4.4020

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Anwar, L., Sa’dijah, C., Muzam Roudloh, Y. F., Yerizon, Y., & Maiyastri, M. (2025). Enhancing Students’ Reasoning Skills with GeoGebra-based Digital Worksheets. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología, 5, 2137. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252137
  2. Cahyanita, E., Sunardi, S., Yudianto, E., Aini, N. R., & Wijaya, H. T. (2021). The development of tangram-based geometry test to measure the creative thinking ability of junior high school students in solving two-dimentional figure problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012051
  3. Diaz Renavitasari, I. R., & Afif Supianto, A. (2018). Educational Game for Training Spatial Ability Using Tangram Puzzle. 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, SIET 2018 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIET.2018.8693164
  4. Dündar, S., & Gündüz, N. (2017). Justification for the subject of congruence and similarity in the context of daily life and conceptual knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3256.35-54
  5. Eloy, A., Cruz, D., Thennakoon, K., & Grant, W. (2020). Buildagram: A constructionist environment for spatial reasoning. Extended Abstracts - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397617.3402037
  6. Flegas, K., & Charalampos, L. (2013). Exploring Logical Reasoning and Mathematical Proof in Grade 6 Elementary School Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.758326
  7. Francisco, J. M. (2025). Teacher support of collective argumentation in mathematics classrooms: insights from an afterschool program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 28(1), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09651-5
  8. Hakim, L. L., Alghadari, F., & Widodo, S. A. (2019). Virtual manipulatives media in mathematical abstraction. Journal of Physics …. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012017
  9. Hamidah, D., Susiswo, Susanto, H., Hakim, Z. A., & Osman, S. (2025). Exploring the Mathematical Reasoning Skills Across Different Levels of Prospective Mathematics Teachers: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Mathematics Education Journal, 19(2), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.22342/mej.v19i2.pp389-412
  10. Hamidah, D., Susiswo, Susanto, H., & Osman, S. (2025). PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ MATHEMATIZATION COMPETENCIES IN SOLVING WORD PROBLEMS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 894–908. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.33211
  11. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/007/07
  12. Isran, D., Susanta, A., Rahimah, D., & Syafri, F. S. (2025). Exploring Mathematical Proofs and Solutions in Higher Education: A Case Study on Real Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 19(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i1.pp163-180
  13. Lai, Y., Strayer, J. F., Ross, A., Adamoah, K., Anhalt, C. O., Bonnesen, C., Casey, S., Kohler, B., & Lischka, A. E. (2023). Enhancing prospective secondary teachers’ potential competence for enacting core teaching practices—through experiences in university mathematics and statistics courses. Zdm Mathematics Education, 55(4), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01485-4
  14. Mata-Pereira, J., & da Ponte, J. P. (2018). Teacher’s actions to promote students’ justifications. Acta Scientiae, 20(3), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v20iss3id3910
  15. Mega Faniya, V., Karuniawati, A., Nugroho, D., Nova Sutrianny, D., Sofia, & Ikashaum, F. (2023). STUDI LITERATUR : PENGGUNAAN TANGRAM SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. Asimtot : Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30822/asimtot.v4i2.2336
  16. Mufti, N. N., Pranata, O. H., & M, M. R. W. (2020). Studi Literatur: Tangram Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Geometri. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2).
  17. Mukuka, A., & Tatira, B. (2025). Analysis of pre-service mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension through Toulmin’s argumentation model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp111-130
  18. Mutmainah, F., & Nuha, M. ’Azmi. (2023). Implementation of Discovery Learning Assisted by Pythagorean Puzzle to Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24090/ijrme.v1i2.8676
  19. Ramadhani, N., Andriansah, M., Erfansyah, M., & Zuliana, E. (2024). PERAN PERMAINAN EDUKATIF TANGRAM DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK INDONESIA (PMRI) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN BANGUN DATAR SISWA. Al-Irsyad Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v3i1.100
  20. Ridwan, I. R., Rizaldi, V. P., Susilawati, S., & Hanif, M. (2023). Pengaruh Media Tangram Berbasis Articulate Storyline 3 terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Materi Bangun Datar. PYTHAGORAS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v18i1.57692
  21. Sasmita, D., Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2019). Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa dengan Model Pembelajaran Generatif Berbantuan Alat Peraga Puzzle Pythagoras. Variabel, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26737/var.v2i2.1816
  22. Staples, M. E., Bartlo, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2012). Justification as a teaching and learning practice: Its (potential) multifacted role in middle grades mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.07.001
  23. Utaminingsih, S., Amalia, I., & Sumaji, S. (2024). Management of Mathematics Learning Based on Interactive Digital Worksheets to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p159
  24. Wardani, A. K., & Putra, H. D. (2024). Penggunaan Media Tangram pada Materi Geometri Bidang Datar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SD. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i2.15336
  25. Weingarden, M., & Buchbinder, O. (2023). Teacher learning to teach mathematics via reasoning and proving: a discursive analysis of lesson plans modifications. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1154531
  26. Zeybek Simsek, Z. (2025). Investigating prospective teachers’ skills of predicting and identifying significant student reasoning instances and deciding how to respond to those instances. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 17(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2024.2391716
Dimensions Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Original Research Articles