Peran psikomotorik dalam pembelajaran matematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/hybrid.v4i3.4545Keywords:
psikomotorik, pembelajaran matematika, aktivitas konkret, motivasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggiAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan peran ranah psikomotorik dalam pembelajaran matematika serta bagaimana penerapannya berkontribusi terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa. Pembelajaran matematika yang bersifat abstrak membutuhkan dukungan aktivitas konkret agar siswa mampu menghubungkan simbol dengan pengalaman nyata. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi pada guru dan siswa yang terlibat dalam pembelajaran berbasis aktivitas fisik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kegiatan psikomotorik, seperti penggunaan alat peraga, pengukuran langsung, pembuatan model, dan manipulasi objek matematika, mampu meningkatkan pemahaman konsep, motivasi belajar, serta kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Aktivitas tersebut juga memperkuat keterampilan sosial siswa melalui kerja kelompok dan diskusi. Meskipun demikian, implementasinya masih menghadapi kendala, terutama pada keterbatasan sarana, waktu pembelajaran, dan kesulitan dalam penilaian keterampilan psikomotorik. Secara keseluruhan, integrasi psikomotorik terbukti efektif dalam menciptakan pembelajaran matematika yang lebih bermakna, sehingga perlu dikembangkan melalui pelatihan guru, penyediaan fasilitas memadai, dan perencanaan pembelajaran yang lebih terstruktur.
References
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012a). Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012b). Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
Bertrand, M. G., Sezer, H. B., & Namukasa, I. K. (2024). Exploring AR and VR Tools in Mathematics Education Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 462–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00152-x
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of educational psychology, 105(2), 380.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006a). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007a). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007b). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hoque, M. E. (2016a). The effect of the teacher-students interaction: An evaluation of an EFL classroom. The journal of EFL education and research, 1(1), 23–27.
Hoque, M. E. (2016b). Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45–52.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999a). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999b). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
Kaharuddin, A., Syam, N., & Gupta, V. (2026). Teacher Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Skills (TPCK-S) and Student Cognitive Agency: Determinants of Deep Learning Outcomes in Immersive Geometry Instruction. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 12(1).
Maisyaroh, M., Sitompul, P., & Asmin, A. (2025a). Development of GeoGebra-Assisted Learning Media Using Contextual Learning to Enhance Mathematical Critical Thinking and Independent Learning. Jurnal Perspektif, 9(2), 258–270.
Maisyaroh, M., Sitompul, P., & Asmin, A. (2025b). Development of GeoGebra-Assisted Learning Media Using Contextual Learning to Enhance Mathematical Critical Thinking and Independent Learning. Jurnal Perspektif, 9(2), 258–270.
Nasrudin, E., Anwar, S., & Rahman, R. A. (2025). Analysis of Psychomotor Domain Objectives from the Perspective of Educational Theorists. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 13–25.
Prince, B., Keshav, R., & Joshi, V. (2024). Designing Transdisciplinary Curriculum: A Dialogue between Engineering and Humanities. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 601–606.
Prince, M. (2004a). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Prince, M. (2004b). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Putri, H. O., & Muchyidin, A. (2022). The Comparison of Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes Between Using Performance Assessment and Self-assessment. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 1(2), 73–82.
Rohmah, A., Rosita, M. D., Fatimah, E. R., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas vii smp dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita materi segitiga. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(2), 175–184.
Rohmah, N. S., Suryaningtyas, W., & Holisin, I. (2023). Implementation of the STEM-GeoGebra Integrated PjBL Model to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 123–134.
Santa Veronika Sitepu, O. P. S., Naibaho, T., & Simanjuntak, R. M. (2022). Evaluasi psikomotorik dalam pembelajaran matematika berbasis hybrid learning. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation, 2(2). https://www.academia.edu/download/110916439/202.pdf
Sari, T. T., & Cahyono, A. H. (2022a). Pembelajaran ranah psikomotor berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 41–56.
Sari, T. T., & Cahyono, A. H. (2022b). Pembelajaran ranah psikomotor berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 41–56.
Shoval, E. (2011a). Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instructional Science, 39(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2
Shoval, E. (2011b). Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instructional Science, 39(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2
Subagis, J., & Setiawan, A. (2022a). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian psikomotor pada penggunaan lego dalam mata pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 39(1), 11–23.
Subagis, J., & Setiawan, A. (2022b). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian psikomotor pada penggunaan lego dalam mata pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 39(1), 11–23.
Tulak, T., Kaharuddin, A., & Tulak, H. (2026). The Representational Divide: A Qualitative Usability Analysis of an Adaptive AI for Atypical Learners. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 16(3).
Walkington, C., Gravell, J., & Huang, W. (2021). Using virtual reality during remote learning to change the way teachers think about geometry, collaboration, and technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 21(4), 713–743.
3.png)
