Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Pemrosesan Informasi Auditori Siswa

Authors

  • Danial Danial Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Asrafiani Arafah Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51574/hybrid.v4i2.4129

Keywords:

Mathematical Problem Solving, Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables, Auditory Information Processing

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ mathematical problem-solving processes in the topic of linear equations in two variables (SPLDV) based on auditory information processing. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, with data collected through problem-solving tests and in-depth interviews. The research subjects were selected based on their dominant auditory learning style. The findings reveal that students with auditory tendencies undergo a systematic information-processing sequence, beginning with understanding the problem through reading aloud, organizing information, planning strategies, and evaluating the results. Verbal activities such as self-talk and verbal repetition help maintain focus, strengthen memory, and enhance conceptual understanding of SPLDV procedures. Furthermore, students demonstrate cognitive flexibility by applying various solution methods, reflecting their reflective and metacognitive abilities. Overall, the study confirms that auditory information processing plays an essential role in improving mathematical problem-solving skills. Therefore, teachers are encouraged to integrate auditory based learning strategies, such as verbal explanations, discussions, and reflective speaking to support students’ comprehension and strengthen their metacognitive and numerical literacy skills in mathematics learning.

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Danial, D., & Azmy, N. (2022). Efektivitas Penerapan Media Alat Peraga Papan Statistika terhadap Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 1, 15–19.

Danial, Upu, H., & Ihsan, H. (2023). Unraveling The Information Processing in Mathematics Learning Based on Learning Style Preferences. Himalayan Journal of Education and Literature, 4(6), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.47310/Hjel.2023.v04i06.004

Domu, I. (2023). Student Learning Styles in Solving Math Story Problems on the Material of Two-Variable Linear Equation Systems. JOE (Journal on Education), 6(1). https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/3200

Faidah, F., Windasari, R. A., Umasyitoh, W., Kusumaningrum, E., & Syah, A. F. (2021). The Application of Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic Learning Styles to Improve Numeracy Literacy of Elementary School Students. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(2). https://journalarsvot.com/index.php/anp-jssh/article/view/590

Firmaningtyas, L. A., Handayani, A. D., Katminingsih, Y., & Widodo, S. (2024). Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Math Problems in Terms of Learning Style. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(5). https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.11_Issue.5_May2024/IJRR-Abstract27.html

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. N.D. Fleming.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Visual, auditory, kinaesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 104–113.

Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract, and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.

Hartati, S., Gufron, D., & Melinda, R. (2022). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability: The Impact of Auditory, Intellectually and Repetition Learning Models and Problem-Based Learning on Trigonometry Materials. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2). https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/desimal/article/view/6739

Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). Mathematical connection middle-school students 8th in realistic mathematics education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 12047.

Hudojo, H. (2005). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran matematika. Malang: UM Press.

Irmayanti, I., & Danial, D. (2019). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Permainan Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Sinjai Selatan. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 6(1), 90–104.

Ismunandar, D., Rosyadi, R., Nurafifah, L., & Jofre, A. (2021). Improving Students’ Problem Solving Abilities through the Application of Auditory Intellectually Repetition Model. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 3(2). https://jurnal.stkipkusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/jim/article/view/1385

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Kaharuddin, A., & Hajeniati, N. (2020). An identification of students’ responses based on SOLO taxonomy in mathematics learning toward learning activities and learning outcomes. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 191-200.

Makiyah, Y. S., Mahmudah, I. R., Sulistyaningsih, D., & Susanti, E. (2021). Hubungan Keterampilan Komunikasi Abad 21 Dan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.9412

Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2004). Abstraction in Mathematics and Mathematics Learning. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

NCTM. (2000). Standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Noviani, D., Lutfiyah, F., Murtinasari, F., & Sukma, L. (2021). Differences of Visual, Auditorial, Kinesthetic Students in Understanding Mathematics Problems. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2). https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/index.php/mjml/article/view/1385

Nurul Hidayah, Danial, T. (2021). Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Program Studi Tadris Matematika IAIM Sinjai. JTMT : Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 2(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.47435/jtmt.v2i2.728

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

Pratiwi, D., & Kaharuddin, A. (2025). Analysis of Students’ Learning Interest in Mathematics on Integer Numbers Material Using the Quizizz Application. EduTransform: Multidisciplinary International Journal, 1(1), 1-12.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Second Princeton paperback printing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pradestya, R., Balkist, P., & Imswatama, A. (2019). Langkah-Langkah Pemecahan Masalah Dan Kemampuan Kognitif. Jurnal Peka, 2(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.37150/jp.v2i2.1113

Syahfitri, P., Siswadi, S., Pitaloka, A., & Maharani, I. (2022). The Effectiveness of Somatic, Auditory, Visualization, and Intellectually Learning Models Against Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2). https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/desimal/article/view/6716

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-22

How to Cite

Danial, D., & Arafah, A. A. (2025). Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Pemrosesan Informasi Auditori Siswa . Hybrid: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 4(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.51574/hybrid.v4i2.4129

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.