Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The manuscript is the author’s original work and is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.
- The manuscript has been prepared in accordance with the author guidelines and article template of Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika
- The submitted article is in Microsoft Office format (.doc/.docx)
- At least 80% of the references are sourced from journal articles or reputable journals
- All citations and references have been managed using a reference manager (Mendeley)
- The author must not submit this article to another journal unless it has been formally declared ‘rejected’ by Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika
- The author is willing to conduct correspondence in a proper, responsive, and ethical manner
- The author(s) agree to provide a Turnitin similarity check report for the submitted article as a supplementary file (with a similarity index of less than 20%).
-
The author(s) agree to provide an Ethical Statement letter as a supplementary file
Original Research Articles
Original Research Articles report previously unpublished findings from empirical, experimental, observational, computational, or other systematic investigations. Manuscripts should present a clearly defined research problem, an appropriate research design, transparent methods, and findings supported by evidence. The discussion should explain the contribution of the study, its relationship to previous research, and its limitations.
The recommended structure includes a Title, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion, followed by relevant declarations and References. Results and Discussion may be combined when appropriate to the study.
Review Articles
eview Articles provide a critical synthesis of existing knowledge on a clearly defined topic within the journal’s scope. A review should go beyond summarizing individual publications by evaluating the evidence, identifying areas of agreement and disagreement, clarifying research gaps, and proposing directions for further investigation.
- Narrative Reviews should explain the purpose, scope, and basis for selecting the literature and provide a coherent, critical analysis of the topic.
- Systematic Reviews should state a focused review question and report transparent procedures for searching, selecting, appraising, and synthesizing relevant studies.
- Scoping Reviews should define the scope of inquiry and describe how the available literature is identified, selected, and mapped.
- Meta-Analyses should explain study eligibility, data extraction, effect-size calculation, statistical synthesis, and the assessment of heterogeneity and potential bias, as applicable.
The recommended structure includes a Title, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Review Methods or Approach, Findings or Thematic Synthesis, Discussion, Conclusion, and References.
Copyright Notice
Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@gmail.com, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com

Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.






.png)
