Constructing the Formative Test for Diagnosing Misconceptions of First-Semester High School Biology

Ikhsanudin Ikhsanudin 1 Indonesia , Bambang Subali 2 Indonesia
1 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
2 Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Link Copied!
Published 2022-09-27
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022) PAGES 562-570
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.629
Views / Downloads 340 559

A misconception is one of the learning obstacles that often occurs in biology class. This study aims to construct a diagnostic instrument to detect misconceptions of biological concepts during the first semester of senior high school and test the quality of the developed instrument. The instrument development model used was a modification of the Oriondo, Dallo-Antonio, and Azwar models. The construction begins with planning the measuring domain and preparing the blueprint for the test instrument. The processes were followed by an instrument seminar, peer review, expert judgment validation, and trying out the test on 885 students. In addition, an unstructured interview with the teachers determines the feasibility of the test instrument. The test content validity according to the Aiken formula is 0.85; the items have different levels of difficulty and good discriminating power; the number of 62 items fits the partial credit model. The reliability of the test is shown by a Kappa coefficient of 0.47. Thus, the test instrument proved to be valid and reliable. Thirteen teachers from eleven schools stated that the test is worthy of use in learning. For the school level, the instrument meets the criteria of a good test instrument.

Ikhsanudin, I., & Subali, B. (2022). Constructing the Formative Test for Diagnosing Misconceptions of First-Semester High School Biology. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 1(4), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i4.629
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aristiawan, A., Retnawati, H., & Istiyono, E. (2019). Analysis of Model fit and Item Parameter of Mathematics National Examination Using Item Response Theory. JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran), 25(2), 40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um047v25i12018p040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um047v25i12018p040
  2. Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.
  3. Azwar, S. (2016). Construction of cognitive ability tests (first edition). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  4. Boo, H.K. (2007). Primary science assessment item setters’ misconceptions concerning biological science concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-13.
  5. Campbell, N.A., & Reece, J. B. (2010). Biology Volume 1 (eighth ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga (The original edition was published in 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc.).
  6. Carin, A.A., & Sund, R. B. (1989). Teaching science through discovery. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
  7. Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
  8. Cullinane, A., & Liston, M. (2016). Review of the Leaving Certificate biology examination papers (1999–2008) using Bloom’s taxonomy–an investigation of the cognitive demands of the examination. Irish Educational Studies, 35(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1192480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1192480
  9. Dettmer, P. (2005). New blooms in established fields: Four domains of learning and doing. Roeper review, 28(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554341
  10. Dietz, R., Letcher, R. J., Desforges, J. P., Eulaers, I., Sonne, C., Wilson, S., ... & Vikingsson, G. (2019). Current state of knowledge on biological effects from contaminants on arctic wildlife and fish. Science of the Total Environment, 696, 133792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133792
  11. El Islami, R. A. Z., Sari, I. J., Sjaifuddin, S., Nurtanto, M., Ramli, M., & Siregar, A. (2019, February). An assessment of pre-service biology teachers on student worksheets based on scientific literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1155, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012068/meta DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012068
  12. Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
  13. Hidayat, S., & Fadillah, E. N. (2019). Development of assessment instruments in measuring critical thinking skills of senior high school participants of biology subject. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1241, No. 1, p. 012040). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012040
  14. Ikhsanudin & Subali, B. (2018). Content validity analysis of first semester formative test on biology subject for senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1097 (2018) 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012039/meta DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012039
  15. Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293.
  16. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  17. Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom's taxonomy. Educational psychologist, 45(1), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433562
  18. Kumandaş, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2019). Misconceptions in biology: a meta-synthesis study of research, 2000–2014. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798
  19. Maley, C., & Bond, T. G. (2011). Measuring cognitive development in early childhood learning environments. In Applications of Rasch Measurement in Learning Environments Research (pp. 301-324). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-493-5_14
  20. Mardapi, D. (2017). Educational measurement, assessment, and evaluation (second edition). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
  21. Nawani, J., von Kotzebue, L., Spangler, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018). Engaging students in constructing scientific explanations in biology classrooms: a lesson-design model. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472131
  22. Näsström, G. (2009). Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: A comparison of teachers and assessment experts. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902749262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902749262
  23. Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
  24. Oriondo, L.L. & Dallo-Antonio. (1998). Evaluating educational outcomes (test, measurement, and evaluation) (5th ed.). Quezon City: REX Printing Company.
  25. Reydon, T. A. (2021). Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00363-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00363-8
  26. Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link‐making: a fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
  27. Stevens, L., Kopnina, H., Mulder, K., & De Vries, M. (2021). Biomimicry design thinking education: A base-line exercise in preconceptions of biological analogies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(4), 797-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09574-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09574-1
  28. Subali, B. (2016). Test development: along with empirical validity and reliability investigations. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
  29. Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Rasch modeling application on educational assessment. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata
  30. Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Ankara: Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi.

Similar Articles

<< < 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
Biology learning Educational assessment High school Misconception Test construction