Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP: Studi Membangun Diskusi Kelompok yang Efektif Melalui Strategi Student Team Heroic Leadership

Muhammad Nurhusain 1 Indonesia , Muhammad Hasby Indonesia
1 STKIP YPUP Makassar
Link Copied!
Published 2021-06-01
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021) PAGES 53 - 65
DOI 10.51574/kognitif.v1i1.15
Views / Downloads 731 754

Matematika pada umumnya identik dengan penghitungan angka dan rumus, sehingga menimbulkan anggapan bahwa keterampilan komunikasi tidak dapat dibangun dari pembelajaran matematika. Salah satu komponen kunci yang dapat mempengaruhi keberhasilan dalam matematika adalah kebutuhan untuk memperhatikan ketelitian yang secara eksplisit meminta siswa untuk memperhatikan ketepatan baik kalkulasi maupun bahasa. Berdasarkan hasil wawancara dengan guru mata pelajaran matematika SMP di salah satu sekolah negeri yang ada di Makassar, peneliti menemukan beberapa masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika  (1) metode yang digunakan guru adalah ceramah. (2) pembelajaran belum berpusat pada siswa (student centered learning). (3) Dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika siswa kurang mampu menuliskan simbol matematika dengan benar. Bagaimana meningkatkan komunikasi matematika siswa dalam membangun diskusi kelompok yang efektif melalui strategi student team heroic leadership adalah tujuan penelitian ini. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas yang akan di adakan minimal 2 siklus, setiap siklus terdiri dari empat tahapan yaitu: 1) Perencanaan, 2) Pelaksanaan, 3) Pengamatan, 4) Refleksi. Subjek Penelitian adalah siswa kelas VII salah satu SMP negeri yang ada di Makassar, yang terdiri dari 6 laki-lai dan 10 perempuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan komunikasi matematika siswa dapat ditingkatkan dengan menerapkan strategi pembelajaran Student Team Heroic Leadership, hal ini ditunjukkan dengan rata-rata nilai hasil tes komunikasi pada siklus I dari 76% menjadi 96% pada siklus II, ketuntasan hasil tes komunikasi matematika siswa secara kalsikal meningkat dari tes siklus I ke tes siklus II, dan terjadi perubahan positif aktivitas siswa pada siklus I dan siklus II. Temuan lain terungkap bahwa adanya kecenderungan siswa menyembunyikan sesuatu yang tidak diketahui selama proses pembelajaran sehingga guru kesulitan untuk menilai sejauh mana pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep dari materi matematika yang disajikan. Harapan peneliti, lebih lanjut akan dilakukan penelitian bagaimana memunculkan percaya diri siswa dalam mengungkapkan ketidaktahuan selama menyelesaikan masalah matematika yang disajikan guru selama proes pembelajaran.

Nurhusain, M., & Hasby, M. . (2021). Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP: Studi Membangun Diskusi Kelompok yang Efektif Melalui Strategi Student Team Heroic Leadership. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v1i1.15
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. (2016). Heroic leadership: An influence taxonomy of 100 exceptional individuals (Issue 2011). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
  2. Amigues, R. (1988). Peer interaction in solving physics problems: Sociocognitive confrontation and metacognitive aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(88)90054-9
  3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203
  4. Brenner, M. E. (1998). Development of mathematical communication in problem solving groups by language minority students. Bilingual Research Journal, 22(2–4), 149–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1998.10162720
  5. Chronaki, A., & Planas, N. (2018). Language diversity in mathematics education research: a move from language as representation to politics of representation. ZDM, 50(6), 1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0942-4
  6. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0101
  7. Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 387-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672059
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Darkasyi, M., Johar, R., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Motivasi Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Pendekatan Quantum Learning pada Siswa SMP Negeri 5 Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.24815/dm.v1i1.1336
  10. Ferguson, K. (2015). Inquiry Based Mathematics Instruction Versus Traditional Mathematics Instruction : The Effect on Student Understanding and Comprehension in an Eighth Grade Pre-Algebra Classroom. Computer Science, 15(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15385/TMED.2010.5
  11. Gokkurt, B., Dundar, S., Soylu, Y., & Akgun, L. (2012). The effects of learning together technique which is based on cooperative learning on students’ achieevement in mathematics class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3431–3434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.079
  12. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 469–485). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5
  13. Istiyani, R. (2013). Implementasi Strategi Student Team Heroic Leadership Dengan Media Lks Untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika (PTK Di Kelas VII C SMP Negeri 3 Ceper Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013). Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  14. Izsák, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2003). Exploring the Use of New Representations as a Resource for Teacher Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18110.x
  15. Jackson, M., & Shenton, A. K. (2015). Independent learning areas and student learning. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000610380821
  16. Johar, R., Junita, E., & Saminan, S. (2018). Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability and Self-Efficacy using Team Quiz Learning Model. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.8702
  17. Jones, K. (1997). Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21–32.
  18. Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Frederick, C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028
  19. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
  20. Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/749653
  21. Manouchehri, A., & John, D. S. (2006). From classroom discussions to group discourse. The Mathematics Teacher, 99(8), 544–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.99.8.0544
  22. Martin, L. C., & Towers, J. (2009). Growing mathematical understanding through collective image making, collective image having, and collective property noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9552-4
  23. Mccrone, S. S. (2005). The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0702_2
  24. Meyer, M., & Schnell, S. (2020). What counts as a “good” argument in school?—how teachers grade students’ mathematical arguments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09974-z
  25. NCTM. (2000). Priciples and Standards for School Mathematics. RestonVA: NCTM.
  26. Nilsson, P., & Ryve, A. (2010). Focal event , contextualization , and effective communication in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9236-7
  27. Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2009). Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: examples from students’, teachers’ and teacher–students’ communication about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9100-9
  28. Pourdavood, B. R. G., & Wachira, P. (2015). Importance of mathematical communication and discourse in secondary classrooms. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 15(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/1699
  29. Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2012). From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9335-0
  30. Radford, L. (2011). Book review: classroom interaction: why is it good, really? Baruch Schwarz, Tommy Dreyfus and Rina Hershkowitz (Eds.)(2009) Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.2307/41486155
  31. Rifdah, & Priatna, N. (2020). The relationship between mathematics resilience and mathematics communication skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032037). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032037
  32. Ryve, A. (2006). Making explicit the analysis of students’ mathematical discourses–Revisiting a newly developed methodological framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-4834-0
  33. Sari, D. S., Kusnandi, K., & Suhendra, S. (2017). A cognitive analysis of students’ mathematical communication ability on geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012083. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012083/meta
  34. Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1), 13–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014097416157
  35. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of educational research. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315
  36. Staples, M., & Colonis, M. M. (2007). Making the Most of Mathematical Discussions. The Mathematics Teacher, 101(4), 257–261. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.5951/MT.101.4.0257
  37. Straehler-pohl, H. (2017). Welcome to the jungle. An orientation guide to the disorder of mathematics education. The Disorder of Mathematics Education, 1-15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7
  38. Stylianou, D. A. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9143-y
  39. Toumasis, C. (2004). Cooperative study teams in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(5), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739042000232529
  40. Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A. B., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions : Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
  41. Wood, L. N. (2012). Practice and conceptions : communicating mathematics in the workplace. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9340-3

Education and Talent Development Center of Indonesia (ETDC Indonesia)
e-mail: kognitif@etdc.org, website : https://etdc-indonesia.com

Creative Commons License
Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika dengan Situs: https://etdci.org/journal/kognitif  berlisensi  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

p-ISSN 2776-9984, e-ISSN 2776-9704 

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Original Research Articles
Keywords
Komunikasi matematika Diskusi kelompok Strategi Student Team Heroic Leadership