Project-Based Authentic Assessment untuk Mengembangkan Assessment Literacy dalam Pembelajaran Evaluasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i1.5864Keywords:
Project-Based Authentic Assessment, Assessment Literacy, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Calon GuruAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis project-based authentic assessment dalam mengembangkan assessment literacy mahasiswa pada pembelajaran Evaluasi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis studi kasus deskriptif. Data diperoleh melalui respons tertulis mahasiswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran Evaluasi dan terlibat dalam proyek penyusunan asesmen autentik. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik coding tematik berbantuan ATLAS.ti melalui tahapan pembacaan data, open coding, pengelompokan kode ke dalam tema, selective coding, dan interpretasi temuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa project-based authentic assessment membantu mahasiswa memahami evaluasi pembelajaran secara lebih konkret dan reflektif. Pertama, mahasiswa mulai memahami bahwa penyusunan evaluasi harus diawali dengan penentuan tujuan pembelajaran melalui analisis capaian pembelajaran, materi, dan kemampuan siswa. Kedua, mahasiswa belajar menyusun instrumen evaluasi secara lebih sistematis melalui kisi-kisi, soal, rubrik, dan kriteria penilaian. Ketiga, mahasiswa masih menghadapi tantangan dalam merumuskan indikator, memilih Kata Kerja Operasional, menentukan level kognitif, dan menyelaraskan indikator dengan soal. Keempat, pengalaman uji coba dan revisi instrumen membantu mahasiswa menemukan kelemahan soal serta memperbaiki bahasa, tingkat kesulitan, bobot, dan rubrik penilaian. Kelima, project ini mengubah pemahaman mahasiswa bahwa evaluasi bukan sekadar memberi nilai, melainkan sarana untuk memahami perkembangan peserta didik, merefleksikan pembelajaran, dan memperbaiki strategi mengajar. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa project-based authentic assessment dapat menjadi strategi pembelajaran yang relevan untuk memperkuat assessment literacy calon guru secara aplikatif, autentik, dan reflektif.
References
Alonzo, D., Leverett, J., & Obsioma, E. (2021). Leading an assessment reform: Ensuring a whole-school approach for decision-making. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 631857. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631857
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
DeLuca, C., Chavez, T., Bellara, A., & Cao, C. (2013). Pedagogies for preservice assessment education: Supporting teacher candidates’ assessment literacy development. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.760024
Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H.-T. (2023). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284
Doyle, A. (2024). Re-envisioning pre-service teachers’ beliefs and feelings about assessment: The important space of authentic assignments. European Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2338854
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Oo, C. Z., Alonzo, D., & Asih, R. A. (2022). Acquisition of teacher assessment literacy by pre-service teachers: A review of practices and program designs. Issues in Educational Research, 32(1), 352–373.
Oo, C. Z., Alonzo, D., & Davison, C. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ decision-making and classroom assessment practices. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 628100. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.628100
Oo, C. Z., Alonzo, D., & Davison, C. (2023). Using a needs-based professional development program to enhance pre-service teacher assessment for learning literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 781–800. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16144a
Papanastasiou, E. C., Giallousi, M., & Pitri, E. (2025). Re-introducing authentic assessment in classroom assessment courses: Finding its place in the 21st century. Education Sciences, 15(11), Article 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111564
Pastore, S. (2022). Assessment literacy in the higher education context: A systematic review. Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning, 4(1), Article 2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1386045.pdf
Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003
Smit, B., & Scherman, V. (2021). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software for scoping reviews: A case of ATLAS.ti. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019140
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022). Are teachers literate in formative assessment? The development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, Article 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101183
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Durotul Qoyimah, Dwi Ratnasari, Taufan Jannatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article manuscript, the author agrees to all policies set forth by the journal and publisher.
The author declares that:
- They have been authorized by their co-authors to enter into this agreement.
- The work described has not been officially published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a lecture, review, thesis, or preprint journal.
- The work is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- Its publication has been approved by all authors and by the responsible authorities—either implicitly or explicitly—of the institution where the work was conducted.
- They have obtained the right to reproduce any material that has been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors publishing in Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0) License, which allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive contractual agreements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citation of the published work.
3.png)
