THE ROLE OF METACOGNITION STRATEGY TO ENHANCE READING COMPREHENSION

Fitrani Dinda Fadilah; Natashah Mohd Ridwan; Nurma Dianti Putri; Suhendri Prayoga; Muhammad Taufik Ihsan

doi:10.51574/jrip.v1i3.231

Authors

Fitrani Dinda Fadilah State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Natashah Mohd Ridwan State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Nurma Dianti Putri State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Suhendri Prayoga student of State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Muhammad Taufik Ihsan State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i3.231

Keywords:

Metacognitive Strategy, Reading, Students

Abstract

Metacognitive strategy is a learning approach based on John Flavell's Metacognitive notion, which describes Metacognition as an individual's ability to freely govern cognitive processes. Students are taught to organize, manage, and evaluate their learning processes via the use of Metacognitive methods, and their critical and creative thinking abilities are strengthened as a result. This capacity must be mastered in order for pupils to feel responsible for their own learning. Teachers who include processes before, during, and after reading into the process when teaching students’ efficient comprehension skills should be conversant with this Metacognitive reading paradigm. In reading, Metacognitive tactics assist pupils in keeping track of their thoughts while they read. Students can use Metacognitive skills to help them become more autonomous learners. Teachers utilize Metacognitive reading skills with their students on a regular basis and expect them to apply them independently as well. Teachers who include the processes before, during, and after reading into the process when teaching students efficient comprehension skills should be conversant with this Metacognitive reading paradigm. In reading, Metacognitive tactics assist pupils in keeping track of their thoughts while they read. Students can use Metacognitive skills to help them become more independent learners. Teachers use Metacognitive reading skills with their students on a regular basis and expect them to apply them independently as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aebersold, J. & Field M. (1997). From Reader to Reading Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC.

Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-479). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Davis, Frederick B. (September 1944). "Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading". Psychometrika. 9 (3): 185–197.

Duffy, Gerald G. (2009). Explaining Reading: A Resource Four Teaching Concepts, Skills, and Strategies. New York: The Guildford Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A new are of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906- 911.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching Fourth Edition. Pearson Longman: Harlow.

Israel, S. E. (2007). Using metacognitive assessments to create individualized reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology,

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Pajarwati, D., Mardiah, H., Harahap, R. P., Siagian, R. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). Curriculum Reform In Indonesia: English Education Toward The Global Competitiveness. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 28-36.

Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. &Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.

Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A. & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.

Pressley, M. &Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. II1, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York: Guilford Press.

Pressley, M. (2006). Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York: Guilford.

Ridhwan, M., & Ihsan, M. T. (2018). THE EFFECT OF COMIC STRIPS ON SECONDARY EFL STUDENTS’READING COMPREHENSION AND WRITING ABILITY. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 2(2), 43-57.

Snow, Catherine. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Los Angeles: RAND

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.