Mathematical Literacy in Algebra Content: The Trajectory of Students Conceptual Cognitive Style

Authors

  • Andi Vitrah Ramadanti Program Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar
  • Abdul Rahman Jurusan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Hamzah Upu Jurusan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v5i1.2617

Keywords:

Algebra Content, Mathematical Literacy, Conceptual Cognitive Style Tempo

Abstract

This study intends to describe the process of students' mathematical literacy in algebra content with a conceptual-tempo cognitive style. We employed a descriptive qualitative research approach. We conducted this research at public high school 23 in Makassar. The MFFT (Matching Familiar Figure Test) helped us choose the people who would be in the study because it finds students with a conceptual tempo cognitive style. The data collection technique uses instruments in the form of mathematical literacy test sheets, interview guidelines, and documentation. This study employs a qualitative data analysis technique. The study's findings showed that students who learned to think quickly and correctly were able to answer level II and IV questions by completing three parts of the literacy process: formulating, using, interpreting, and evaluating. Students with an impulsive cognitive style in solving level II and IV questions were only able to fulfill 1 aspect of the literacy process, namely the aspect of formulating. Students with a reflective cognitive style are capable of addressing three aspects of the literacy process, which include formulating, using, interpreting, and evaluating information. Additionally, students with a slow, inaccurate cognitive style in completing level II and IV questions are only able to fulfill 1 aspect of the literacy process, namely the aspect of formulating.

Downloads

References

Abella, J., Kilag, O. K., Andrin, G., Tañiza, F. N., Groenewald, E., & Cordova Jr, N. (2024). Benchmarking Literacy and Numeracy: The Contributing Elements. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(1), 90-99.

Alvani, A. (2016). Profil Kreativitas Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal tentang Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 171-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.6437

Amiruddin, Baharuddin, F. R., Takbir, & Setialaksana, W. (2023). May student-centered principles affect active learning and its counterpart? An empirical study of Indonesian curriculum implementation. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231214375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231214375

Broudy, H. S. (2017). Types of knowledge and purposes of education. In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 1-17). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315271644-1

Çakıroğlu, Ü., Güler, M., Dündar, M., & Coşkun, F. (2024). Virtual reality in realistic mathematics education to develop mathematical literacy skills. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4661-4673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2219960

Chan, J. Y. C., Ottmar, E. R., & Lee, J. E. (2022). Slow down to speed up: Longer pause time before solving problems relates to higher strategy efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, 102109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102109

Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111

Daniyati, N. A. (2014). Variasi soal matematika dengan metode problem solving untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2).

Diana, R. F., & Nurmawanti, I. (2020). Gaya kognitif konseptual tempo dan hasil belajar: suatu studi pada mahasiswa teknik. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 289-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i2.6406

Edo, S. I., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2013). Investigating secondary school students' difficulties in modeling problems PISA-Model Level 5 and 6. Journal on mathematics Education, 4(1), 41-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.561.41-58

Edo, S. I., & Tasik, W. F. (2022). Investigation of Students' Algebraic Conceptual Understanding and the Ability to Solve PISA-Like Mathematics Problems in a Modeling Task. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(2), 44-60.

Fajriyah, E., Mulyono, M., & Asikin, M. (2019). Mathematical literacy ability reviewed from cognitive style of students on double loop problem solving model with RME approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 57-64.

Ferreira, S. M., & Bisognin, V. (2020). Construction of mathematical and financial concepts based on realistic mathematics education. Acta Scientiae, 22(5), 226-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5925

Festiawan, R. (2020). Belajar dan pendekatan pembelajaran. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 11.

González-Martín, A. S., Gueudet, G., Barquero, B., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2021). Mathematics and other disciplines, and the role of modelling: Advances and challenges. Research and development in university mathematics education, 169-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346859-12

Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Prospective mathematics teachers’ thinking styles and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100827

Hairani, H., Prayitno, S., Turmuzi, M., & Soepriyanto, H. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Pola Bilangan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 177-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v11i2.9885

Happy, N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematika dalam menyelesaikan masalah trigonometri ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 79-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v14i1.15314

Herliania, E. F., & Wardono, W. (2019, February). Perlunya kemampuan Literasi Matematika ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dalam pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, pp. 234-238).

Hidajat, D., Hasbi, M., & Fitri. (2024). Metacognitive Skills of College Students in Mathematics Problem Solving: Overview by Student's Field Dependent. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 3(2), 196-206.

Holenstein, M., Bruckmaier, G., & Grob, A. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: an integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 799-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00491-4

Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between Mathematical Literacy and Opportunity to Learn with Different Types of Mathematical Tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13625.199-222

Ho, S. K., & Gan, Z. (2023). Instructional practices and students’ reading performance: a comparative study of 10 top performing regions in PISA 2018. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00261-1

Jurdak, M. (2016). Learning and teaching real world problem solving in school mathematics. Learning and Teaching Real World Problem Solving in School Mathematics. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-08204-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08204-2

Juvonen, J., Lessard, L. M., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H. L., & Smith, D. S. (2019). Promoting social inclusion in educational settings: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645

Mamoh, O., Taus, D. L., & Fitriani, F. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Matematika Siswa Smk Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel Tipe HOT. SIGMA, 6(2), 130-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v6i2.958

Manfreda Kolar, V., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical Literacy from the Perspective of Solving Contextual Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467

Maskur, R., Nofrizal, N., & Syazali, M. (2017). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika dengan Macromedia Flash. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 177-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v8i2.2014

Muzaini, M., Hasbi, M., & Nasrun, N. (2021). The Role of Students’ Quantitative Reasoning in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Cognitive Style. Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 3(2), 87-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v3i2.380

Ningsih, F., Sudia, M., & Jafar, J. (2020). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika (Journal of Mathematics Thinking Learning), 5(1), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33772/jpbm.v5i1.12878

Patta, R., Muin, A., Mujahidah, M., & Pasinggi, Y. (2021). Kemampuan literasi numerasi ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif-impulsif. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 5(2), 212-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v5i2.20130

Osei, W., & Agyei, D. D. (2024). Transition from knowledge of algebra for teaching (KAT) to technological knowledge of algebra for teaching (T-KAT). Cogent Education, 11(1), 2369000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2369000

Ozkale, A., & Ozdemir Erdogan, E. (2022). An analysis of the interaction between mathematical literacy and financial literacy in PISA. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 53(8), 1983-2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526

Rachmawati, Y. I., Sugandi, E., & Prayitno, L. L. (2019). Senior High School Students' Ability in Posing System of Linear Equations in Two Variables Problems. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 57-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i1.6954

Ramadanti, A. V., Syahri, A. A., & Kristiawati, K. (2022). Deskripsi Keterampilan Metakognitif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo. Paradikma, 15(1), 32-42.

Safadi, R., & Hawa, N. (2024). Learning from erroneous examples in the mathematics classroom: do students with different naïve ideas benefit equally?. Instructional Science, 52(2), 277-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09648-2

Saracho, O. N. (Ed.). (2017). Cognitive style in early education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315209968

Sari, P. O., & Wulan, E. R. (2024). Level of Students' Mathematical Literacy Based on Cognitive Conceptual Tempo (Reflective-Impulsive). JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 9(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2024.9.1.1-19

Setiawati, S. M. (2018). Telaah Teoritis: Apa Itu Belajar? HELPER: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 35 (1), 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36456/helper.vol35.no1.a1458

Sheninger, E. C., & Murray, T. C. (2017). Learning transformed: 8 keys to designing tomorrow’s schools, today. ASCD.

Siregar, E., Sutiarso, S., & Yusuf, Z. (2021). Analysis of students' mathematical literacy ability in algebraic concepts based on trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) problems. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 21, 381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v21i1.3904

Ulutas Keskinkılıc, A., Emre, O., & Cosanay, B. (2022). The predictive effect of problematic behaviours on cognitive tempo and attention level in 60–66 months old children. Early Child Development and Care, 192(14), 2246-2255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1999236

Uralovich, K. S., Toshmamatovich, T. U., Kubayevich, K. F., Sapaev, I. B., Saylaubaevna, S. S., Beknazarova, Z. F., & Khurramov, A. (2023). A primary factor in sustainable development and environmental sustainability is environmental education. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(4), 965-975.

Vásquez, C., Piñeiro, J. L., & García-Alonso, I. (2022). What challenges does the 21st century impose on the knowledge of primary school teachers who teach mathematics? An analysis from a Latin American perspective. Mathematics, 10(3), 391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030391

Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. Zdm, 52, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4

Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Talib, C. A. (2024). Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 139-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139-156

Published

2025-03-04

How to Cite

Ramadanti, A. V., Rahman, A., & Upu, H. (2025). Mathematical Literacy in Algebra Content: The Trajectory of Students Conceptual Cognitive Style. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v5i1.2617