Mathematics Learning Experience: Students' Perspectives on Teachers' Teaching Approaches in the Classroom

Khoerul Umam 1 Indonesia
1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
Link Copied!
Published 2025-06-27
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025) PAGES 732-740
DOI 10.51574/ijrer.v4i3.3338
Views / Downloads 745 269

This study explores students’ perspectives on the mathematics learning process in the classroom, highlighting the importance of effective teaching methods. The purpose of this study is to understand students’ preferences and needs regarding the teaching styles of mathematics teachers that can improve their interest and understanding. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenological design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with high school students. Thematic analysis identified three main themes constructed from interview transcripts. The results showed that students desired a more student-centred mathematics learning process with a focus on practical experience and personal support. This study concluded that students desired a more intense and actual integration of the mathematics learning process with technology. Constructive feedback from teachers to students is essential for identifying errors and correcting students’ work. A teacher’s enjoyable learning style will leave a positive impression of mathematics for them in the future.

Umam, K. (2025). Mathematics Learning Experience: Students’ Perspectives on Teachers’ Teaching Approaches in the Classroom . ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review , 4(3), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i3.3338
More Citation Formats
Download Citation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aga, K. (2024). Comfort in active learning spaces–students’ perceptions and preferences. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(4), 785-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2341756
  2. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Engineering, 10(2), 2283282. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
  3. Alasmari, N. J., & Althaqafi, A. S. A. (2024). Teachers’ practices of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and the relationship to their self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2158-2189. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211046351
  4. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
  5. Bourne, M. J., Smeltzer, S. C., & Kelly, M. M. (2021). Clinical teacher self-efficacy: A concept analysis. Nurse education in practice, 52, 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103029
  6. Cho, H. J., Melloch, M. R., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2021). Enhanced student perceptions of learning and performance using concept-point-recovery teaching sessions: a mixed-method approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00276-1
  7. Corte, E. D. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied psychology, 53(2), 279-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00172.x
  8. Frenzel, A. C., Daniels, L., & Burić, I. (2021). Teacher emotions in the classroom and their implications for students. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1985501
  9. Frommelt, M. C., Schiefele, U., & Lazarides, R. (2023). The contributions of teachers’ educational interest and relational goals to instructional quality and student interest in mathematics classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102184
  10. Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2020). The effects of prior informal science and math experiences on undergraduate STEM identity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1627307
  11. Grecu, A. L., Hadjar, A., & Simoes Loureiro, K. (2022). The role of teaching styles in the development of school alienation and behavioral consequences: A mixed methods study of Luxembourgish primary schools. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221105477. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221105477
  12. Hendrickson, P. (2021). Effect of active learning techniques on student excitement, interest, and self-efficacy. Journal of Political Science Education, 17(2), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2019.1629946
  13. Hurst, M., & Cordes, S. (2017). When being good at math is not enough: How students’ beliefs about the nature of mathematics impact decisions to pursue optional math education. In Understanding emotions in mathematical thinking and learning (pp. 221-241). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802218-4.00008-X
  14. Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the relationships between prospective mathematics teachers’ classroom management anxiety, academic self-efficacy beliefs, academic amotivation and attitudes toward the teaching profession using structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449
  15. Kim, M. H., Han, J., Buford, K. N., Osterhage, J. L., & Usher, E. L. (2024). Undergraduate student perceptions of instructor mindset and academic performance: A motivational climate theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 102280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102280
  16. Koparan, T., Dinar, H., Koparan, E. T., & Haldan, Z. S. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into mathematics teaching and learning and examining its effectiveness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101245
  17. Lauermann, F., & ten Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ perceived teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? A closer look at student-reported classroom processes and outcomes. Educational psychologist, 56(4), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355
  18. Lim, B. Y., Lake, V. E., Beisly, A. H., & Ross-Lightfoot, R. K. (2024). Preservice teachers’ TPACK growth after technology integration courses in early childhood education. Early Education and Development, 35(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2224219
  19. Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 53(2), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555
  20. Poçan, S., Altay, B., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2023). The effects of mobile technology on learning performance and motivation in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 683-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6
  21. Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., ... & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: TPACK and effective teaching practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133
  22. Reinholz, D., Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Stone-Johnstone, A., Smith, J., Mullins, B., ... & Shah, N. (2022). When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204-226. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0143
  23. Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P. O. (2021). Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
  24. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2022). Why are learning and teaching mathematics so difficult?. In Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 1-35). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_10-1
  25. Spaho, E., Çiço, B., & Shabani, I. (2025). IoT Integration Approaches into Personalized Online Learning: Systematic Review. Computers, 14(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020063
  26. Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
  27. Täht, K., Mikkor, K., Aaviste, G., & Rozgonjuk, D. (2024). What motivates and demotivates Estonian mathematics teachers to continue teaching? The roles of self-efficacy, work satisfaction, and work experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 961-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09587-2
  28. Wu, L., Hsieh, P. J., & Wu, S. M. (2022). Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100871
  29. Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). The impact of mathematics teachers’ professional competence on instructional quality and students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101225
  30. Zhu, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students’ mathematics learning interest, mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics test achievements: a secondary analysis of Shanghai data from the international video study Global Teaching InSights. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(3), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01343-9

Copyright (c) 2025 Khoerul Umam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Dimension Badge

Downloads

Downloads
Crossmark Badge
Crossmark Badge
Section
Articles
Keywords
High School Learning Experience Mathematics Teaching Approaches Teachers' Classroom