Analyzing the Impact of Google Earth on the Learning Motivation of Elementary School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v3i2.1418Keywords:
Elementary School, Google Earth, Learning Motivation, RADECAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of Google Earth on the learning motivation of elementary school students in Jakarta using the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) model. The sample consists of 40 fifth-grade students from a Jakarta elementary school. This is qualitative and quantitative research. The study's average results indicate that using Google Earth motivates 45.5% of students to learn. Before and after using Google Earth, based on the presentation, there was an increase of 23% in the learning motivation of Jakarta elementary school students. Before using Google Earth, student learning motivation was at 34%. Meanwhile, after using Google Earth, students' learning motivation increased by 57%. This study uses the RADEC model (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) in teaching and learning activities. Then, we discovered that Google Earth had an influence on indicators of students' learning motivation, such as their desire to learn, their needs, their ability to reach goals, their encouragement, and the creation of a pleasant learning atmosphere. Earth. The RADEC model with Google Earth technology further increases elementary school students' learning motivation compared to the RADEC model without Google Earth technology.
References
Akrim, M. (2018). Media Learning in Digital Era. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Community Development (AMCA 2018), 231(Amca), 458–460. https://doi.org/10.2991/amca-18.2018.127
Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
Alderman, M. K. (2013). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Routledge.
Alfatikh, E. R., Winanti, E. T., Prasetya, S. P., & Budiyanto, E. (2020). Implementing Google Earth to Enhance Student’s Engagement and Learning Outcome in Geography Learning. Geosfera Indonesia, 5(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v5i1.11987
Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society: The educational transformation of global culture. Stanford University Press.
Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14(April), 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Berends, H., & Deken, F. (2021). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018824838
Code, J. (2020). Agency for Learning: Intention, Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5(February), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019
Crittenden, W. F., Biel, I. K., & Lovely, W. A. (2019). Embracing Digitalization: Student Learning and New Technologies. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318820895
Dahama, O. P. (2019). Education and communication for development. Oxford and IBH Publishing.
Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Olden, D., & Dresel, M. (2021). Academics’ motivations in professional training courses: effects on learning engagement and learning gains. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1768396
Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers and Education, 137, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004
Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Sternad Zabukovšek, S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2018-0559
Englund, T. (2016). On moral education through deliberative communication. Journal of curriculum studies, 48(1), 58-76.
Erdiwansyah, Mahidin, Mamat, R., Sani, M. S. M., Khoerunnisa, F., & Kadarohman, A. (2019). Target and demand for renewable energy across 10 ASEAN countries by 2040. Electricity Journal, 32(10), 106670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2019.106670
Fuadi, F. N., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2021). The mastery of grade 4 of elementary school students’ concepts on energy through the implementation of the RADEC learning model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012140
Ghani, A. R. A., Fatayan, A., Azhar, N. C., & Ayu, S. (2022). Evaluation of technology-based learning in an Islamic school. 20(3), 190–195.
Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2019). Intrinsic Motivation as the Foundation for Culturally Responsive Social-Emotional and Academic Learning in Teacher Education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(4), 53–66.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Hadi, B. S., Mukminan, Muhsinatun Siasah, M., & Sariyono, K. E. (2021). The Effect of Google Earth-Assisted Remote Sensing Learning on Students ’Spatial Thinking Ability in Solving Disaster Mitigation Problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 884(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/884/1/012013
Hamdanah, H., D, R., & I, S. (2020). Google Earth Utilization in Increasing Spatial Literacy of High School Students. International Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1).
Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2020). Motivation and learning strategies: Student motivation affects student learning strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.39
Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Motivation and action, third edition. Springer, 1–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4
Imbar, V. R., Supangkat, H. S., Langi, A., & Arman, A. A. (2022). Digital transformation readiness in Indonesian institutions of higher education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 20(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.445
Jiang, L. (2021). A fast and accurate circle detection algorithm based on random sampling. Future Generation Computer Systems, 123, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.05.010
Junaidin, Sugiyono, Suryono, Y., & Komalasari. (2022). Teacher s achievement in curriculum 2013 training: A hierarchical linear model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15151a
Karlina, D., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2020). Critical Thinking Skills of Fourth Grade in Light Properties Materials through the Radec Model. The 2nd International Conference on Elementary Education, 2, 1743–1753.
Kartowagiran, B., Suyanta, Hamdi, S., Jaedun, A., Ahman, Rusijono, & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2020). Development of web-based application for teacher candidate competence instruments: Preparing professional teachers in the IR 4.0 era. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1749–1763. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1749
Liang, J., Gong, J., & Li, W. (2018). Applications and impacts of Google Earth: A decadal review (2006–2016). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 146(20), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.08.019
Ma’ruf, A. S., Wahyu, W., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Colloidal learning design using radec model with stem. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 758–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.4.p.758-765
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 106(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement With Scientific Argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059
Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Prameswari, N. S., Saud, M., Amboro, J. L., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2020). The motivation of learning art & culture among students in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1809770
Pratama, Y. A., Sopandi, W., Hidayah, Y., & Trihatusti, M. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah dasar. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 191-203.
Pudjastawa, W. A. (2022). Google earth virtual journey to improve writing skills of high school students in malang. ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 6(2), 207–225.
Puspitarini, D. Y., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Ramalingam, K. (2022). Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Learning Among Primary School Students. Management …, 23(1), 1889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37178/ca-c.23.1.186
Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451
Rondon, S., Sassi, F. C., & Furquim de Andrade, C. R. (2013). Computer game-based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students’ knowledge retention. BMC medical education, 13, 1-8.
Ross, B., Chase, A. M., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to increase motivation, engagement and learning outcomes in a first year accounting unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0113-2
Sabirli, E. Z., & Çoklar, N. A. (2020). World Journal on Educational Technology : Current Issues and attitudes of elementary school students against course access. World Journal on Educational Technology, 12(4), 326–338.
Safaruddin, S., Ibrahim, N., Juhaeni, J., Harmilawati, H., & Qadrianti, L. (2020). The Effect of Project-Based Learning Assisted by Electronic Media on Learning Motivation and Science Process Skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.5
Satria, E., & Sopandi, W. (2019). Applying RADEC model in science learning to promoting students’ critical thinking in elementary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1321, No. 3, p. 032102). IOP Publishing.
Scheerens, J. (2016). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. A critical review of the knowledge base, 389.
Scheerens, J., Glas, C. A., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring: A systemic approach (Vol. 13). Taylor & Francis.
Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person-in-context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21409
Siregar, L. S., Wahyu, W., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Polymer learning design using Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain and Create (RADEC) model based on Google Classroom to develop student’s mastery of concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012078
Sprague, J. (2002). Communication education: The spiral continues. Communication Education, 51(4), 337-354.
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
Sukmawati, D., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2020). The Application of Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-and Create ( Radec ) Models to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Class V Elementary School on Human Respiratory System. The 2nd International Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1), 1734–1742.
Sukowati, & Sartono, E. K. E. (2020). The Implementation of Kahoot!: (A Game-Based Student Response System): A Tool Used in Improving Learning Motivation of Elementary School Students. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377571.3377620
Tamiminia, H., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Quackenbush, L., Adeli, S., & Brisco, B. (2020). Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 164(January), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.001
Tisza, G. (2021). The role of fun in learning. Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 18(21), 391–393.
Trajkovik, V., Malinovski, T., Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., & Vasileva, M. (2018). Traditional games in elementary school: Relationships of student’s personality traits, motivation and experience with learning outcomes. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202172
Wei, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, H. H., & Liu, J. (2017). Blended learning versus traditional learning: a study on students’ learning achievements and academic press. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 219-223). IEEE.
Williamson, B. (2019). New power networks in educational technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1672724
Winstone, N. E., Mathlin, G., & Nash, R. A. (2019). Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement With Feedback Toolkit. Frontiers in Education, 4(May), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00039
Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121570.
Zhonggen, Y., & Xiaozhi, Y. (2019). An extended technology acceptance model of a mobile learning technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22111
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 1-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831076-1
Zmuda, A., & Kuklis, R. (2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. ASCD.
Zulherman, Zain, M. F., Napitupulu, D., Sailin, N. S., & Roza, L. (2021). Analyzing Indonesian Students’ Google Classroom Acceptance During COVID-19 Outbreak: Applying an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1697–1710.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
1.png)
