Children’S Voices in Primary Classroom Decision-Making: Navigating Majority Rule, Inclusion, and Teacher Authority

Authors

  • Venna Puspita Sari Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Nur Fitri Handayani Pancasila and Civic Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Mulawarman
  • Apit Dulyapit Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Kwartanti Fajriatin Pancasila and Civic Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Samudra
  • Dessy Norma Juita Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i4.5983

Keywords:

Children’s Voices, Democratic Agency, Classroom Decision-Making, Inclusion, Civic Education in Elementary School

Abstract

Student participation in classroom decision-making raises questions about whose views count when majority preferences limit some children’s involvement and opportunities to disagree depend on relationships with peers and teachers. This study explored children’s perspectives, reasoning, and imagined actions when majority decisions intersect with inclusion and teacher authority. An exploratory qualitative design using a vignette was employed in one fourth-grade class at an urban public primary school in Bogor, Indonesia. Participants included 34 students aged 9–10 who completed an open-ended questionnaire, four students purposively selected for semi-structured interviews based on variation in their responses, and one classroom teacher. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, distinguishing hypothetical responses from students’ reported experiences and the teacher’s accounts of practice. Three themes were developed: changing activities or helping children adapt to enable participation; expressing disagreement amid anticipated rejection and concerns about relationships; and considering students’ proposals within the teacher’s decision-making authority. Students proposed different ways to include peers, but articulating alternatives did not necessarily entail willingness to pursue them. Their accounts incorporated anticipated peer responses, concern for others’ feelings, and perceived limits on action. The teacher reported instances of student influence while retaining final authority. These findings show how reasoning attentive to inclusion can coexist with acceptance of collective decisions and reluctance to express disagreement. Classroom decision-making should provide opportunities to elicit affected students’ perspectives and discuss the reasons underlying decisions. Further observational research is needed to examine how children’s expressed reasoning relates to participation in practice.

References

Andriana, E., & Evans, D. (2020). Listening to the voices of students on inclusive education: Responses from principals and teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Artikel 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101644

Baytaş, M. O., & Schroeder, S. (2021). Cultivating civic engagement in the early grades with culturally appropriate children’s literature. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 33(4), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.66392/105603021832922240

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196

Cardiff, G., Beni, S., Fletcher, T., Bowles, R., & Chróinín, D. N. (2024). Learning to facilitate student voice in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 30(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231209687

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091

Geurts, E. M. A., Reijs, R. P., Leenders, H. H. M., Jansen, M. W. J., & Hoebe, C. J. P. A. (2024). Co-creation and decision-making with students about teaching and learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change, 25(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09481-x

Gillett-Swan, J., & Baroutsis, A. (2024). Student voice and teacher voice in educational research: A systematic review of 25 years of literature from 1995–2020. Oxford Review of Education, 50(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2257132

Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education (edisi revisi). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7sdfv

Holquist, S. E., Mitra, D. L., Conner, J., & Wright, N. L. (2023). What is student voice anyway? The intersection of student voice practices and shared leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(4), 703–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x231178023

Karlsen, A. M. F., & Ohna, S. E. (2021). Pupils’ voices in teachers’ collaborative professional learning in Lesson Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 110, Artikel 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101877

Long, K. A., & Grant, C. (2024). Child participation in South African primary schools: How useful is the Lundy model? South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1), Artikel 1354. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1354

Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033

Lundy, L., Murray, C., Smith, K., & Ward, C. (2024). Young children’s right to be heard on the quality of their education: Addressing potential misunderstandings in the context of early childhood education. British Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 1825–1842. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3968

Männistö, P. M., & Moate, J. (2024). A phenomenological research of democracy education in a Finnish primary-school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(5), 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2196525

Manyukhina, Y. (2025). Children’s agency in England’s primary schools: A case for structured freedom. British Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 2491–2510. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4182

Mascadri, J., Brownlee, J. L., Johansson, E., Scholes, L., Walker, S., & Berthelsen, D. (2021). Children’s perspectives on why and when teachers listen to their ideas: Exploring opportunities for participation in the early years of school. International Journal of Educational Research, 107, Artikel 101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101747

Mayes, E., Black, R., & Finneran, R. (2021). The possibilities and problematics of student voice for teacher professional learning: Lessons from an evaluation study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2020.1806988

Messiou, K., de los Reyes, E. J., Potnis, C., Dong, P., & Rwang, V. K. (2025). Student voice: Bringing about change in primary schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 38(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2025.2455982

Messiou, K. K., & Szelei, N. (2024). Promoting inclusive pedagogies in schools through student voice and dialogues. Dalam The SAGE handbook of inclusive education (hlm. 712–725). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036204679.n56

Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–774. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212443079

Murphy, A., Roberts, L., Williams, J., Chicken, S., Clement, J., Waters-Davies, J., & Tyrie, J. (2025). Participative rights in Welsh primary schools: Unpicking the policy rhetoric. Policy Futures in Education, 23(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241257281

Perry-Hazan, L., & Somech, A. (2023). Conceptualising student participation in school decision making: An integrative model. Educational Review, 75(6), 1202–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1976113

Santos, I. M., Amatullah, T., Agbenyega, J., & de Souza, D. N. (2024). The influence of student voice on teacher professional learning: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 12(3), Artikel e70014. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70014

Schroeder, S. (2017). Democratic teacher education: From theory to praxis. Professing Education, 16(1), 10–24.

Sinaga, I. C., Wirantho, S. A., Gazali, H., Dewi, R. K., Sumartini, A. T., & Indra, A. D. (2025). Panduan mata pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia.

Susandi, A., Zamzani, Z., Prabowo, M., & Yulianto, B. (2024). Portrait of students’ language politeness in elementary school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.24872

Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., Prastowo, A., Nuryana, Z., Firdausi, D. K. A., & Samaalee, A. (2022). The great teacher: The Indonesian adolescent student voice. Frontiers in Education, 6, Artikel 764179. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.764179

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Sari, V. P., Handayani, N. F., Dulyapit, A., Fajriatin, K., & Juita, D. N. (2026). Children’S Voices in Primary Classroom Decision-Making: Navigating Majority Rule, Inclusion, and Teacher Authority. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(4), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v5i4.5983