A Descriptive Analysis of Sentence Construction Across English Exposure Profiles Among Elementary EFL Learners

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5911

Authors

  • Rahma Amalia Insyra Magister of English Education, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

Keywords:

EFL learners, English exposure, Sentence Construction, Writing Accuracy

Abstract

Research on out-of-school English among young learners has concentrated largely on vocabulary and broad proficiency, leaving limited evidence on how reported exposure profiles appear in micro-level sentence production among Indonesian elementary EFL learners. This study describes sentence construction across three reported exposure profiles and identifies recurrent grammatical difficulties. A descriptive qualitative design with frequency tabulation was used with 15 sixth-grade students at SDN 22 Mesuji Timur. Exposure labels were retained from the original classroom tabulation and treated as descriptive profiles because validated cut-off scores could not be reconstructed from the available dataset. Four English sentence-production prompts were coded as complete and accurate, complete with grammatical error, fragment or lexical response, irrelevant or non-target response, or missing. One translation prompt was analyzed separately. Each learner had four production opportunities. The high-profile group had 12 observed responses, while the moderate and limited groups had 11 of 12 and 35 of 36 observed responses because one response was missing in each group. Complete responses accounted for 7/12, 2/11, and 1/35 observed responses, respectively. Recurrent difficulties involved verb form after modal will, subject-verb agreement, unnecessary copula insertion, and article omission. Translation yielded seven accurate, five partial, and three inaccurate or irrelevant responses. Within this small, uneven sample, the archived profiles displayed different proportions of complete sentence production, but no causal or correlational inference is made. The study contributes a micro-level coding approach for distinguishing lexical knowledge, structural completeness, and grammatical accuracy in elementary EFL writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

De Wilde, V., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Game on! Young learners' incidental language learning of English prior to instruction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 673-694. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.6

De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020a). Learning English through out-of-school exposure: How do word-related variables and proficiency influence receptive vocabulary learning? Language Learning, 70(2), 349-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12380

De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020b). Learning English through out-of-school exposure: Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001062

Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024

Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Guzmán-Alcón, I. (2026). The impact of intensity of CLIL programmes and extramural English on primary school students' communicative appropriateness in writing. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24028.guz

Harmaini, F. (2026). Incidental English learning through social media and English proficiency among Indonesian Gen Z: A cross-sectional survey. Computers and Education Open, 10, 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100358

Kuppens, A. H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903561876

Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.422

Leona, N. L., van Koert, M. J. H., van der Molen, M. W., Rispens, J. E., Tijms, J., & Snellings, P. (2021). Explaining individual differences in young English language learners' vocabulary knowledge: The role of extramural English exposure and motivation. System, 96, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102402

Lestari, L. K. P., & Baidawi, A. (2026). Elementary EFL students' cognitive and affective responses to visual illustrations in English sentence construction. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(2), 1020-1033. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i2.2309

Oei, B. B., Mustofa, A., & Anam, S. U. (2024). The role of extramural English exposure as revealed in the language accuracy of secondary school EFL writers. Issues in Language Studies, 13(1), 391-412. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.6098.2024

Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003

Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019). Learners' English vocabulary knowledge prior to formal instruction: The role of learner-related and word-related variables. Language Learning, 69(4), 943-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12364

Royani, S., & Sadiah, S. (2019). An analysis of grammatical errors in students' writing descriptive text. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(6), 764-770. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i6.p764-770

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Setiasih, L. (2014). The role of out-of-school English literacy activities in promoting students' English literacy. TEFLIN Journal, 25(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i1/62-79

Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Traga Philippakos, Z. A. (2019). Sentence construction: Supporting elementary students' editing skills. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 29(1), Article 3.

Tran, L., & Miralpeix, I. (2024). Out-of-school exposure to English in EFL teenage learners: Is it related to academic performance? Education Sciences, 14(4), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040393

Winarta, I. B. G. N., & Rahmanu, I. W. E. D. (2020). Students' syntax error in making English conversation: An error analysis study. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.25078/yb.v3i2.529

Published

2026-10-10

How to Cite

Amalia Insyra, R. (2026). A Descriptive Analysis of Sentence Construction Across English Exposure Profiles Among Elementary EFL Learners. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(3), 1523 – 1533. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5911