Negotiating Female Agency within Gendered Social and Cultural Contexts: A Feminist Reading of Selalu Ada Ruang untuk Pulang

https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5838

Authors

  • Hapsari Retno Kinasih Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa, Seni dan Budaya, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Else Liliani Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa, Seni dan Budaya, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Women’s Representation, Gender Construction, Gender Performativity, Female Agency, Indonesian Literature

Abstract

Women’s representation in literature provides a means of examining how gender norms shape identity, social expectations, and the possibilities for female agency. This study examines the representation of women and the construction of gender in Karima Ifha’s novel Selalu Ada Ruang untuk Pulang, focusing on ho​w the main character, Khansa, negotiates her agency within gendered social and cultural contexts. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the study analyzes the novel as its primary data source. Data were collected through repeated reading and documentation of relevant narrative passages, dialogues, and character actions, and then examined through close reading and thematic analysis informed by feminist perspectives and Judith Butler’s concept of gender performativity. The findings reveal four interconnected dimensions of women’s representation and gender construction: Khansa’s resilience and professional participation, expectations surrounding intimate relationships and physical appearance, the organization of gender within religious spaces, and solidarity among Muslim women. These dimensions indicate that Khansa is portrayed as capable of making decisions and responding to challenges, while her self-understanding and choices remain shaped by social recognition, gendered expectations, and interpersonal relationships. The study’s contribution lies in integrating women’s representation, gender construction, and agency within a contextual analysis of a contemporary Indonesian novel. It concludes that Khansa’s agency is neither wholly autonomous nor entirely constrained but is negotiated through the interaction of personal capacity, social norms, and relational support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banet-Weiser, S., & Miltner, K. M. (2016). MasculinitySoFragile: Culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490

Beidollahkhani, A. (2025). Visual resistance, digital counterpublics, and feminist agency in Iran’s digital protests from 2018 to 2023. Discourse & Communication, 19(5), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813251380447

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Gender-Trouble-Feminism-and-the-Subversion-ofIdentity/Butler/p/book/9780415389556

Dahya, N., & King, W. E. (2020). Politics of race, gender, and visual representation in feminist media education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1769934

Dery, I. (2026). Re-imagining gender equality discourse through an Africa(n)-centred feminist perspective. Journal of Gender Studies, 35(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2428416

Earles, J. (2017). Reading gender: A feminist, queer approach to children’s literature and children’s discursive agency. Gender and Education, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1156062

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Faux, E. (2024). Deconstructing Barbenheimer: A feminist analysis of gender and the representation of nuclear war. Feminist Theory, 25(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001241291706

Finden, A. (2018). Active women and ideal refugees: Dissecting gender, identity and discourse in the Sahrawi refugee camps. Feminist Review, 120(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0139-2

Gill, R. (2016). Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293

Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2019). The significance of symbolic representation for gender issues in politics. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 27(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2019.1660404

Melton, B. (2026). By women for women: Communicating gender discourse in r/FemaleDatingStrategy. Feminist Media Studies, 26(4), 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2453442

Nartey, M. (2024). Women’s voice, agency and resistance in Nigerian blogs: A feminist critical discourse analysis. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2246138

Netz, H., & Kuzar, R. (2020). Entanglement and feminist agency in picture books. Gender and Language, 14(4), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.40038

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight big-tent criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

Valtýsdóttir, B. S., & Halldórsdóttir, B. E. (2025). Construction of gender-based violence in prevention material in the Icelandic education system: A critical discourse analysis. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 33(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2025.2452540

Xu, J. (2026). Stigmatizing feminism in nationalist discourse: A critical discourse analysis of a Chinese anti-feminist online forum. Journal of Gender Studies, 35(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2025.2475206

Yalcinoz-Ucan, B., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2024). Disclosing gender-based violence online: Strengthening feminist collective agency or creating further vulnerabilities? Feminist Media Studies, 24(5), 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2229060

Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Pang, H. (2026). Structural-violence framing, de-gendering discourse, and muted misogyny: The official media’s representation of gender-based violence in contemporary China. Feminist Media Studies, 26(4), 1369–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2468905

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Kinasih, H. R., & Liliani, E. (2026). Negotiating Female Agency within Gendered Social and Cultural Contexts: A Feminist Reading of Selalu Ada Ruang untuk Pulang. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(3), 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v6i3.5838