Preferensi Media Pembelajaran dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Generasi Z dalam Pendidikan Pemasaran Layanan Kesehatan: Peran Modul, PowerPoint, dan Media Kombinasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/msej.v3i2.5199Keywords:
learning media preference, healthcare marketing education, module, powerpoint, instructional designAbstract
Learning media selection is an important pedagogical issue in higher education. This study examined the association between students’ learning media preferences and answer scores in a healthcare marketing course. A quantitative observational design was used involving 304 students. Learning media preference was categorized into module, PowerPoint, combined module and PowerPoint, and other media. The primary outcome was answer score, while course rating and perceived interest were analyzed as descriptive indicators of learning experience. Descriptive statistics, group-based score comparison, multicollinearity assessment using variance inflation factor, and linear regression were applied. The combined-media group was used as the reference category in the regression model. Module-based learning was the most frequently preferred medium (38.5%), followed by combined module and PowerPoint use (30.6%) and PowerPoint-only preference (25.0%). Students achieved a high mean answer score of 83.22, while course rating was also high at 4.68 out of 5, and perceived interest was reported by nearly all respondents. PowerPoint-preferring students showed the highest descriptive mean score (84.55), followed by module-preferring students (82.99) and combined-media students (82.36). Regression analysis indicated that module preference was not significantly associated with answer score, while PowerPoint preference showed a positive but non-significant trend. Learning media preference alone did not significantly explain differences in student answer scores. The findings suggest that media format may be less important than pedagogical alignment, learner engagement, self-regulated learning, and instructional design quality. Future research should examine how media preference interacts with learning strategy, engagement, cognitive load, and course design in healthcare management education.
References
Barteit, S., Guzek, D., Jahn, A., Bärnighausen, T., Jorge, M. M., & Neuhann, F. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 145, 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
Bland, T., Guo, M., & Dousay, T. A. (2024). Multimedia design for learner interest and achievement: A visual guide to pharmacology. BMC Medical Education, 24, 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05077-y
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Dunleavy, G., Nikolaou, C. K., Nifakos, S., Atun, R., Law, G. C. Y., & Car, L. T. (2019). Mobile digital education for health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e12937. https://doi.org/10.2196/12937
Edisherashvili, N., Saks, K., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2022). Supporting self-regulated learning in distance learning contexts at higher education level: Systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 792422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792422
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
León, S. P., & García-Martínez, I. (2021). Impact of the provision of PowerPoint slides on learning. Computers & Education, 173, 104283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104283
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 57–72). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008
O’Doherty, D., Dromey, M., Lougheed, J., Hannigan, A., Last, J., & McGrath, D. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: An integrative review. BMC Medical Education, 18, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors—enablers and barriers—affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20, 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Tang, Q., Zhang, T., & Jiang, L. (2023). Influence of blended instruction on students’ learning effectiveness: The role of flow. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1891–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11224-z
Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504
Yin, B., & Yuan, C.-H. (2021). Precision teaching and learning performance in a blended learning environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631125
