Analisis Gaya Berpikir Sekuensial-Acak Konkret dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Fisika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51574/msej.v2i2.3259Keywords:
Thinking Style, Concrete Sequential, Concrete Random, Physics, Problem SolvingAbstract
This study aims to describe the Concrete Sequential and Concrete Random thinking styles in solving physics problems of students. The subjects of this study were selected based on purposive sampling technique and two students of MAN 2 Makassar were selected, each of which represents the thinking style. The subjects were classified based on the thinking style questionnaire adapted from John Parks' instrument. This research used a qualitative descriptive approach. The data in this study were collected through problem solving tests and interviews as a form of clarification of the test results obtained. The results showed that students with Concrete Sequential thinking style relied more on memorized notes and equations to solve problems. Meanwhile, students with a Concrete Random thinking style do not fully understand the basic concepts and tend to use a trial and error approach.
References
Alfika, Z. A., & Mayasari, T. 2018. Profil Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Pelajaran Fisika Siswa. Seminar Nasional Quantum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. 2016. Quantum learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.
Djadir, Upu, H., & Sulfianti, A. 2018. The profile of students’ mathematical problem solving on the topic of two-variable linear equation systems based on thinking styles. 2nd International Conference on Statistics, Mathematics, Teaching, and Research, 1-6.
Kurniawan, B. R., Handayanto, S. K., & Parno. 2016. Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang. Seminar Nasional Fisika Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang. R
Lestanti, M. M., Isnarto, & Supriyono. 2015. Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Siswa dalam Model Problem Based Learning. Journal of Mahematics Education, 5(1), 16-23.
Muliana, E., Saminan, & Wahyuni, A. 2017. Gaya Berpikir Siswa dalam Menganalisis Konsep Fisika melalui Grafik Kinematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika, 264-271.
Patimah, D., & Murni. 2017. Analisis Kualitatif Gaya Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Pada Matri Gerak Parabola. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(2), 106-118.
Rahayu, R., Saminan, & Mursal. 2018. The analysis of thinking style and confident in solving physics problems. Unnes Science Education Jurnal (USEJ), 7(2), 156-162.
Sanusi, D. K., Arafah, K., Amin, B. 2020. Analisis Gaya Berpikir Sekuensial-Acak Abstrak Peserta Didik dalam memevchakan masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 8(1), 60-67.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wijaya, P. A., Jasruddin, & Arafah, K. 2019. Kemampuan Peserta Didik Kelas X dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-soal Kognitif Tipe Menganalisis dan Mengevaluasi pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 75-86.
Wismath, S. L., & Orr, D. 2015. Collaborative learning in problem solving: a case study in metacognitive learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 1-17.
